The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Pattern Analysis in Bone around Implant-supported Abutment with Different Angulations under Axial and Oblique Load

Vinutna Uppalapati, Sandeep Kumar, Rajnish Aggarwal, Ijaz Bhat, Jagruthi Munaganti, Saiba Khan

Keywords : Angulated abutments, Bone-loss, Dental implants, Finite element analysis, Stress pattern

Citation Information : Uppalapati V, Kumar S, Aggarwal R, Bhat I, Munaganti J, Khan S. Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Pattern Analysis in Bone around Implant-supported Abutment with Different Angulations under Axial and Oblique Load. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (1):16-20.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3464

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-05-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Aim: The goal of this research was to compare the stress distribution in the bone adjacent to the implant where three different angled abutments were loaded in both the axial and oblique directions. Materials and methods: The premaxilla region was digitally recreated in 3-dimension (3D) using a finite element model, with a solid 4.2 mm by 13 mm implant and abutments at 0°, 15°, and 25° of rotation. Axial load (100 N) and oblique load were also applied to the abutments (178 N). Six models were made and used with a fixed bases. The coefficient of friction was set at a constant value of 0.02. The CITIA program was used for the stress analysis. In this investigation, we employed linear static analysis. Each abutment and crown in the model has subjected to an arbitrary vertical load as well as the oblique load. Results: The cortical bone around the implant with a 25° angled abutment experienced a maximum von Mises stress of 187.692 Mpa under oblique load. This stress was increased with the degree of abutment angulation. Conclusion: As abutment angulation was increased, axial and oblique burdens were also increased. In both cases, we were able to identify the source of the observed growth. When we looked at the effect of stress on angulation, we found that the peaks were seen in the area of abutment and cortical bone. Since it was difficult to predict the stress distribution around implants with varying abutment angles in a clinical setting, finite element analysis (FEA) was chosen for this investigation as a more cutting-edge approach. Clinical significance: It is a herculean task calculating the prompted forces clinically, FEA has opted for this study as it's a progressively wielded tool to prognosticate the stress allocation in the region of the implants with different angled abutments.

PDF Share
  1. Bruggenkate CMT, Sutter F, Oosterbeek HS, et al. Indications for angled implants. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(1):85–93. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90056-g.
  2. Eger DE, Gunsolley JC, Feldman S. Comparison of angled and standard abutments and their effect on clinical outcomes: A preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(6):819–823. PMID: 11151580.
  3. Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P. The use of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: Five-year clinical results of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(6):801–810. PMID: 11151578.
  4. Oderich E, Boff LL, Simon R, et al. Optimized placement of angled abutments for external-hex implant platforms: A pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24(3):238–240. PMID: 21519570.
  5. J Cavallaro and G Greenstein. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142(2):150–158. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0057.
  6. Tallgren A. The reduction in face height of edentulous & partially edentulous subjects during long term denture wear: A longitudinal roentgeno-graphic cephalometric study. Acta Odontol Scand 1966;24(2):195–239. DOI: 10.3109/00016356609026127.
  7. Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, et al. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant supported prosthesis & supporting bone: A three dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91(2):144–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.018.
  8. Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, et al. The influence of bone mechanical properties & implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9(6):407–418. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090606.x.
  9. Papavasiliou G, Tripodakis AP, Kamposiora P, et al. Finite element analysis of ceramic abutment restoration combinations for osseo-integrated implants. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9(6):254–260. PMID: 8957860.
  10. Cochran DL. The scientific basis for & clinical experiences with Straumann implants including the ITI dental implant system: A consensus report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(Suppl 1):33–58. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1033.x.
  11. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design & overload influence marginal bone loss & fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3(3):104–111. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x.
  12. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry, 2nd edition. Missouri: St. Louis, Mosby; 1998. pp. 109–134, 207–217, 329–343, 595–608.
  13. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. Implant prosthodontic treatment options for the edentulous patient. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22(8):661–671. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb01064.x.
  14. Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H, et al. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillo Implants 1998;13(1):82–90. PMID: 9509784.
  15. Albrektsson T. A multicenter report on osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60(1):75–84. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90355-1.
  16. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants: A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 1988;59(5):287–292. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287.
  17. Gomez-Roman G, Schulte W, d'Hoedt B, et al. The Frialit-2 implant system: Five-year clinical experience in single-tooth & immediately postextraction applications. Int J Oral Max Impl 1997;12(3):299–309. PMID: 9197094.
  18. Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Anand SC, et al. Stress analysis of porous rooted dental implants. J Dent Res 1976;55(5):772–777. DOI: 10.1177/00220345760550051001.
  19. Bahuguna R, Anand B. Evaluation of stress patterns in bone around dental implant for different abutment angulations under axial & oblique loading: A finite element analysis. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2013;4(1):46–51. DOI: 10.4103/0975-5950.117882.
  20. Hellsing G. On the regulation of inter incisor bite force in man. J Oral Rehabil 1980;7(5):403–411. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1980.tb00459.x.
  21. Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Bite force & state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand 1977;35(6):297–303. DOI: 10.3109/00016357709064128.
  22. Schaeffer A, Baltimore. Behavior of the axis of human incisor teeth during growth. Angle Orthod 1949;19(4):254–275.
  23. Koosha S, Jalalian E, Safari S, et al. Effect of abutment angulation & material on stress & strain distributions in premaxillary bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci 2017;2(4):1–8. DOI: 10.29252/jrdms.2.4.1.
  24. Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci, A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(1):15–46. PMID: 10697938.
  25. B. Rangert, Torsten J. Forces & moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4(3):241–242. PMID: 2700747.
  26. NL Clelland, JK Lee, Olivier C Bimbenet, et al. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthodont 1995;4(2):95–100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1995.tb00323.x.
  27. Lin CL, Wang JC, Ramp LC, et al. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density & loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23(1):57–64. PMID: 18416413.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.