The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Saudi Children's and Their Parents Perception of a Digitally Modified Photograph Model of Different Smiles with Different Anterior Teeth Alignments and Dental Appearances

Mujahid Abdullah Alnasser, Thiyezen Abdullah AlDhelai

Keywords : Dentofacial esthetic, Digitally modified photograph, Perception, Saudi children, Smiling face

Citation Information : Alnasser MA, AlDhelai TA. Saudi Children's and Their Parents Perception of a Digitally Modified Photograph Model of Different Smiles with Different Anterior Teeth Alignments and Dental Appearances. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (1):48-55.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3463

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-05-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Aim: Since there is a lack of data on dentofacial esthetic perception in Saudi Arabia, the present research was conducted to study children's and their parent's perceptions of smiles with different dental alignments and dental appearances. In addition, we aimed to determine whether facial attractiveness or dental esthetic dominates the overall esthetic perception. Finally, we aimed to investigate the influence of gender on the judgment of a dental smile. Materials and methods: Six digitally altered photographs and two dynamic videos of smiling faces of boys and girls with different dental alignments and appearances were shown to 183 children and their parents in malls in Saudi Arabia's Qassim Province. Following the parent's acceptance of the interview, the child was interviewed first, followed by the parent. Their responses were measured using a smile perception questionnaire (SPQ) for children aged 8–10 years. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The results demonstrated that whole-face smiles of both boys and girls with different poor dentofacial esthetics had a significantly lower rating score than lower third-face smiles scores among children and their parents (p ≤ 0.05). Except for a few views, there were no significant differences between children's and their parents’ dentofacial esthetic judgments. Moreover, the answers to the smile perception questionnaire 8–10 for the smiling face dynamic videos of boys and girls were not significantly different. Conclusion: Children agreed with their parents in judging the smiles of different dentofacial esthetic perceptions. Overall, esthetics was more influenced by facial esthetics than dental esthetics. Background attractiveness and sexual characteristics do not affect smile perception. Clinical significance: The smile is considered one of the major determinants of how the overall esthetic of children will appear. Thus, the comprehensive diagnosis involving the analysis of malocclusion and poor dental appearance psychological effect can be used for patient care improvement. Consequently, dental treatment to improve the dental smile will enhance the children's quality of life and social interaction.

PDF Share
  1. Miller AG. Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonomic Science 1970;19(4):241–243. DOI: 10.3758/BF03328797.
  2. Zebrowitz LA, Montepare JM. Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Soc personal psychol compass 2008;2(3)1497. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00109.
  3. Albino JE, Lawrence SD, Tedesco LA. Psychological and social effects of orthodontic treatment. J Behav Med 1994;17(1):81–98. DOI: 10.1007/BF01856884.
  4. Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, et al. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod 1995;17(6):505–512. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/17.6.505.
  5. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, et al. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod 1985;87(1):21–26. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90170-8.
  6. Papio MA, Fields HW Jr, Beck FM, et al. The effect of dental and background facial attractiveness on facial attractiveness and perceived integrity and social and intellectual qualities. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;156(4):464e1–474e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.10.021.
  7. Petricević N, Stipetić J, Antonić R, et al. Relations between anterior permanent teeth, dental arches and hard palate. Coll Antropol 2008;32(4):1099–1104. PMID: 19149214.
  8. Anderson KM, Behrents RG, McKinney T, et al. Tooth shape preferences in an esthetic smile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128(4):458–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.045.
  9. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, et al. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(6):748–753. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.039.
  10. Oreški NP, Čelebić A, Petričević N. Assessment of esthetic characteristics of the teeth and surrounding anatomical structures. Acta Stomatol Croat 2017;51(1):22–32. DOI: 10.15644/asc51/1/3.
  11. Gupta T, Sadana G, Rai HK. Effect of esthetic defects in anterior teeth on the emotional and social well-being of children: A survey. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(3):229–232. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1628.
  12. Pithon MM, Andrade D, Fernandes I, et al. Influence of malocclusion on social perceptions of adolescents at public and private schools. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2014;15(1):37–43. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-013-0050-7.
  13. Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, et al. Children's perceptions of smile esthetics and their influence on social judgment. Angle Orthod 2016;86(6):1050–1055. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-013-0050-7.
  14. Henson ST, Lindauer SJ, Gardner WG, et al. Influence of dental esthetics on social perceptions of adolescents judged by peers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140(3):389–395. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.026.
  15. Batwa W. The Influence of the smile on the perceived facial type esthetics. Biomed Res Int 2018;9;2018:3562916. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3562916.
  16. Verdecchia F, Bee M, Lombardo L, et al. Influence of anterior tooth alignment on peer perception in 8- to 10-year-old children. Eur J Orthod 2011;33(2):155–160. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq049.
  17. Lombardo L, Berveglieri C, Guarneri MP, et al. Anterior dental alignment and smile: Perception and sensations in a sample of 8- to 10-year-old children and their parents. Orthodontics (Chic.) 2011;12(4):366–377. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq049.
  18. de Sousa ET, da Silva BF, Maia FB, et al. Perception of children and mothers regarding dental aesthetics and orthodontic treatment need: A cross-sectional study. Prog Orthod 2016;17(1):37. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-016-0149-6.
  19. Dave B, Shah V, Bargale S, et al. Evaluation of parental perception regarding smile of children according to visual analog scale. J Integr Health Sci 2018;6(2):41–44. DOI: 10.4103/JIHS.JIHS_16_18.
  20. Tiro A, Nakas E, Arslanagic A, et al. Perception of dentofacial aesthetics in school children and their parents. European journal of dentistry. Eur J Dent 2021;15(1):13–19. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714040.
  21. Gavric A, Mirceta D, Jakobovic M, et al. Craniodentofacial characteristics, dental esthetics-related quality of life, and self-esteem. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147(6):711–718. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.027.
  22. Lombardo L, Berveglieri C, Guarneri A, et al. Dynamic evaluation of anterior dental alignment in a sample of 8- to 11-year-old children. Int Orthod 2012;10(2):177–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2012.03.013.
  23. Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Orthodontics about face: The re-emergence of the esthetic paradigm. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117(5):575–576. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70204-6.
  24. Ma F, Xu F, Luo X. Children's and adults’ judgments of facial trustworthiness: The relationship to facial attractiveness. Percept Mot Skills 2015;121(1):179–198. DOI: 10.2466/27.22.PMS.121c10x1.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.