Effect of Ridge Splitting of Mandibular Knife Edge Ridges with Two-implant Retained Overdenture with Locator Attachments on Peri-implant Bone Level and Posterior Ridge Resorption: A One-year Preliminary Study
Marwa A Helmy, Noha H El-Shaheed, Fatma A El Waseef, Wael S Ahmed, Salah A Hegazy
Citation Information :
Helmy MA, El-Shaheed NH, El Waseef FA, Ahmed WS, Hegazy SA. Effect of Ridge Splitting of Mandibular Knife Edge Ridges with Two-implant Retained Overdenture with Locator Attachments on Peri-implant Bone Level and Posterior Ridge Resorption: A One-year Preliminary Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (11):834-839.
Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate peri-implant bone height changes and posterior ridge resorption by using two-implant retained polyetheretherketone (PEEK) overdentures with locator attachments following expansion of mandibular knife edge ridges by ridge splitting.
Materials and methods: Eighteen patients were selected for ridge splitting followed by expansion, implant placement, and bone graft application. Six months later, the fabrication of PEEK overdentures retained by locator attachments was accomplished. Friedman test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Spearman correlation were used to evaluate the changes over time.
Results: Peri-implant bone height loss increased significantly with the advance of time between 6 and 12 months following denture insertion. Posterior area index changes were significant over time when measured at the time of denture insertion and twelve months following denture insertion.
Conclusion: The effect of using PEEK as overdenture base material retained with two locator attachments allowed sharing the load between the peri-implant bone anteriorly and residual ridge posteriorly in cases with ridge splitting technique.
Clinical significance: Using PEEK as an overdenture base material is a successful means of bone preservation.
Minocha T, Mattoo K, Rathi N. An 2 by 2 Implant Overdenture. J Clin Res Dent 2020;3(1):1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33309/2639-8281. 030102.
Patel J, Gray D. Implant-supported overdentures: Part 2. Br Dent J 2021;231(3):169–175. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-3278-3.
Bilal AM, Bioumy MM, Al-Awady AA, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of crestal ridge splitting versus osseodensifcation techniques for dental implant placement into narrow alveolar ridge. J Int Dent Med Res 2011;15(1):205–211. ISSN 1309-100X.
Manekar V, Shenoi R, Manekar S, et al. The effect of modern devices of alveolar ridge split and expansion in the management of horizontally deficient alveolar ridge for dental Implant: A systematic review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2022;14(3):1–14. DOI:10.4103/njms.njms_423_21.
Rathod V, Mehta N, Bomdyal R, et al. Lateral ridge expansion to augment narrow alveolar ridges for immediate implant. World J Pharm Res 2015;10(7):1003–1013. DOI: 10.20959/wjpr20217-20802.
Abu Tair JA. Modification of mandibular ridge splitting technique for horizontal augmentation of atrophic ridges. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2014;4(1):19–23. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.133066.
Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, et al. Bone regenerative medicine: Classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. J Orthop Surg Res 2014;9(1):18. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-18.
Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: An update. Injury 2005;36(3):20–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029.
Starch-Jensen T, Becktor JP. Maxillary alveolar ridge expansion with split-crest technique compared with lateral ridge augmentation with autogenous bone block graft: A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2019;10(4):e2. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2019.10402.
Fu R, Feng Y, Liu Y, Yet al. Mechanical regulation of bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis. Med Nov Technol Devices 2021;11: 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medntd.2021.100077.
Li Y, Pan Q, Xu J, et al. Overview of methods for enhancing bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis: Potential roles of biometals. J Orthop Translat 2021;27:110–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.11.008.
Sato R, Matsuura T, Akizuki T, et al. Influence of the bone graft materials used for guided bone regeneration on subsequent peri-implant inflammation: An experimental ligature-induced peri-implantitis model in Beagle dogs. Int J Implant Dent 2022;8(1):3. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-022-00403-9.
Eid AM, ElSheikh SA, Noureldin MG. Evaluation of bone width change using a two-stage ridge splitting approach in narrow posterior mandibular ridge (an observational case-series study). ADJ 2022;47(2):1–7. DOI: 10.21608/ADJALEXU.2020.45441.1112.
Dellavia C, Canciani E, Pellegrini G, et al. Histological assessment of mandibular bone tissue after guided bone regeneration with customized computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture titanium mesh in humans: A cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2021;23(4):600–611. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13025.
Arnal HM, Angioni CD, Gaultier F, et al. Horizontal guided bone regeneration on knife-edge ridges: A retrospective case-control pilot study comparing two surgical techniques. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2022;24(2):211–221. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13073.
Indumathi M, Mozhi UA, Sudarsan S, et al. Piezoelectric driven mandibular ridge split technique with immediate implant placement: A case report. IP Int J Periodontol Implantol 2021 28;6(2):126–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpi.2021.021.
Hamdan HA, Salame TH, Aoun G. Full mouth rehabilitation using alveolar ridge splitting technique with immediate implant placement in the maxilla and delayed implant placement in the mandible: A case report with 4 years follow-up. J Adv Med Med Res 2021;33(7):81–89. DOI: 10.9734/jammr/2021/v33i730877.
Sohn DS, Lee HJ, Heo JU, et al. Immediate and delayed lateral ridge expansion technique in the atrophic posterior mandibular ridge. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68(9):2283–2290. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.04.009.
Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006;17 (Suppl 2):136–159. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01357.x.
Mahmoud NN, El-Ghareeb T, Elbagoury EF. Evaluation of implant stability after conventional versus piezoelectric alveolar ridge splitting with immediate implantation in mandibular posterior region “A randomized controlled trial.” Indian J Public Health Res Dev 2021;12(3):439–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v12i3. 16096.
Sohn DS, Ahn MR, Lee WH, et al. Piezoelectric osteotomy for intraoral harvesting of bone blocks. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27(2):127–131. PMID: 17514884.
Fathy Neena A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis to evaluate stress distribution around implant retained mandibular overdenture using two different attachment systems. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther 2015 28;(5):171–178. DOI: 10.15406/jdhodt.2015.02.00065.
ElGabry H, Moubarak A, Eltaftazani I, et al. Effect of cap micro-movement on the selection of implants’ attachment type: Three-dimensional finite element analysis. JASMAR 2021;16(2):137–143. DOI: 10.4103/jasmr.jasmr_21_21.
Gray D, Patel J. Implant-supported overdentures: Part 1. Br Dent J 2021;231(2):94–100. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-3224-4.
Nobre M de A, Guedes CM, Almeida R, et al. Spotlight Poly-ether-ether-ketone and implant dentistry: The future of mimicking natural dentition is now! Polymer international 2021;70(8):999–1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.6212.
Verma S, Sharma N, Kango S, et al. Developments of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) as a biomedical material: A focused review. Eur Polym J 2021;147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110295.
Fairhurst A, Thommen M, Rytka C. Comparison of short- and long-term creep testing in high performance polymers. Polym Test 2019;78:1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105979.
Naveau A, Shinmyouzu K, Moore C, et al. Clinical medicine etiology and measurement of peri-implant crestal bone loss (CBL). J Clin Med 2019;8(2):166. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8020166.
Elsyad MA, Mohamed SS, Shawky AF. Posterior mandibular ridge resorption associated with different retentive systems for overdentures: A 7-year retrospective preliminary study. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30(3):260–265. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5114.
ELsyad MA, Hammouda NI. Expansion of mandibular knife-edge ridge and simultaneous implant placement to retain overdentures: One-year clinical and radiographic results of a prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017;19(1):167–179. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12436.
Rashed NH, El Shaheed NH, Said Ahmed WM, et al. Soft metal versus laser melting metal framework used for mandibular all on four implant supported fixed complete denture. Mansoura Journal of Dentistry 2022;9(4):149–155. DOI: 10.21608/MJD.2022.156078.1074.
Wright PS, Glantz PO, Randow K, et al. The effects of fixed and removable implant-stabilised prostheses on posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13(2):169–174. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130207.x.
Denewar BA, El Waseef FA, El Mekawy N, et al. The effect of ridge splitting with laser bio-stimulation on bone loss around four implant supported mandibular overdentures (within-patient study). IJSRM 2021;19(4):112–124. DOI: 10.19070/2377-8075-21000996.
Hegazy SA, Abd El Khalek S, Salem AS, et al. Effect of laser bio stimulation with split ridge technique on bone loss around mandibular four implant supported bar overdentures. Mansoura Journal of Dentistry 2021;8(31):43–49.
Luo C, Liu Y, Peng Bo, et al. PEEK for oral applications: Recent advances in mechanical and adhesive properties. MDPI 2023;15(2):333386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15020386.
Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, et al. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 2016;60(1):12–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001.
Kortam SA. Metal versus poly ether-ether ketone (PEEK) framework reinforcements for maxillary palateless ball retained implant overdentures. One year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Egypt Dent J 2020;66(3):1817–1828. DOI: 10.21608/EDJ.2020.33441. 1160.
Shash YH, El-Wakad MT, Eldosoky MAA, et al. Evaluation of stress and strain on mandible caused using “All-on-Four” system from PEEK in hybrid prosthesis: Finite-element analysis. Odontology 2023;111(3):618–629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00771-z.
Chen X, Mao B, Zhu Z, et al. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of mechanical function for 4 removable partial denture designs with 3 framework materials: CoCr, Ti-6Al-4V alloy and PEEK. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):13975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50363-1.
Papathanasiou I, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, et al. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health 2020;20(1):217. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01202-7.
Badr AMI, Hassan AGA. Radiographic evaluation of posterior alveolar ridge resorption in implant-retained mandibular overdentures using three different bar modalities. Int dent med j adv Res 2017;3(1):1–6. DOI: 10.15713/ins.idmjar.69.
Raedel M, Lazarek-Scholz K, Marré B, et al. Posterior alveolar ridge resorption in bar-retained mandibular overdentures: 10-year results of a prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26(12): 1397–1401. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12393.
Emera RMK, Abdel-Khalek EA. Five-year radiographic changes of residual ridges under maxillary complete denture and its opposing mandibular two implant-retained overdenture with different resilient attachments. Egyptian Dental Journal 2019;65(1):119–128. DOI:10.21608/edj.2019.72809.
El-Anwar MI, El-Taftazany EA, Hamed HA, et al. Influence of number of implants and attachment type on stress distribution in mandibular implant-retained overdentures: Finite element analysis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2017;5(2):244–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2017.047.
Elsaih EA. Implant – supported distal extension mandibular partial overdenture: Comparison of two attachment types of effect on mandibular posterior residual alveolar bone (five year retrospective study). Dent J 2020;66(2):1317–1326. DOI: 10.21608/EDJ.2020.23975.1007.
ELsyad MA, Denewar BA, Elsaih EA. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of bar, telescopic, and locator attachments for implant-stabilized overdentures in patients with mandibular atrophied ridges: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33(5):1103–1111. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6363.