The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Association of Non-carious Cervical Lesions with Oral Hygiene Aspects and Occlusal Force

Rafael Dario Werneck, Daher Antonio Queiroz, Mariana Itaborai Moreira Freitas, Diana Leyva Del Rio, Cecília Pedroso Turssi

Keywords : Bite Force, Dental Occlusion, Gingival Recession, Tooth Wear

Citation Information : Werneck RD, Queiroz DA, Freitas MI, Del Rio DL, Turssi CP. Association of Non-carious Cervical Lesions with Oral Hygiene Aspects and Occlusal Force. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (2):71-79.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3457

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 23-05-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Aim: The purpose of this case-control (CT) study was to investigate the association between the presence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) with occlusal force and other potential risk factors. Materials and methods: Thirty-nine participants with NCCLs [cases (CS)] and 39 with no NCCLs [control (CT)] attending the dental clinic of the Faculdades Integradas São Pedro (FAESA), located in Brazil, were enrolled in this study. Information was collected through anamnesis, clinical examination, and a questionnaire addressing aspects related to tooth brushing, dentifrice, and mouthwash use. In clinical examination, patients were submitted to four measurements of occlusal force in the maxillary first premolars and maxillary first molars, using a strain gauge sensor of medium intensity, the Flexiforce (Tekscan, South Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America). The sensor was calibrated for the unit of measurement in Newtons (N). Data were analyzed using a student's t-test and multiple logistic regression, e with a significance level of 5%. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the case and CT groups regarding the bite force in the four measured regions. Logistic regression identified sex as a factor significantly associated with NCCLs (p = 0.020). The odds ratio showed the female sex had more chance (OR = 6.082; CI = 1.332–27.765) of having NCCLs. Conclusion: It is concluded that females presented a higher risk factor for NCCLs than men. In contrast, there was no association of occlusal force, as well as aspects related to brushing and deleterious habits. Clinical significance: Females have a higher risk factor for non-carious lesions than men.

  1. Dietschi D, Argente A. comprehensive and conservative approach for the restoration of abrasion and erosion. Part I: Concepts and clinical rationale for early intervention using adhesive techniques. Eur J Esthet Dent 2011;6(1):20–33. PMID: 21403925.
  2. Van't Spijker A, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Occlusal wear and occlusal condition in a convenience sample of young adults. J Dent 2015;43(1):72–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.11.001.
  3. Van't Spijker A, Rodriguez JM, Kreulen CM, et al. Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(1):35–42. PMID: 19260425.
  4. Grippo JO. Abfractions: A new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 1991;3(1):14–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00799.x.
  5. Teixeira DN, Thomas RZ, Soares PV, et al. Prevalence of noncarious cervical lesions among adults: A systematic review. J Dent 2020;95:103285. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103285.
  6. Badavannavar AN, Ajari S, Nayak KU, et al. Abfraction: Etiopathogenesis, clinical aspect, and diagnostic-treatment modalities: A review. Indian J Dent Res 2020;31(2):305–311. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_863_18.
  7. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52(3):374–380. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90448-7.
  8. Levrini L, Di Benedetto G, Raspanti M. Dental wear: A scanning electron microscope study. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:340425. DOI: 10.1155/2014/340425.
  9. Munari LS, Cornacchia TP, Moreira AN, et al. Stress distribution in a premolar 3D model with anisotropic and isotropic enamel. Med Biol Eng Comput 2015;53(8):751–758. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1289-4.
  10. Consolaro A, Consolaro MFMO. [Abfraction: hypersensitivity, occlusal trauma and other non-carious cervical lesions]. Portuguese: Rev Dental Press Estét 2006;3(3). pp. 122–131.
  11. Demarco FF, Cademartori MG, Hartwig AD, et al. Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) and associated factors: A multilevel analysis in a cohort study in southern Brazil. J Clin Periodontol 2022;49(1):48–58. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13549.
  12. Wood ID, Kassir AS, Brunton PA. Effect of lateral excursive movements on the progression of abfraction lesions. Oper Dent 2009;34(3): 273–279. DOI: 10.2341/08-100.
  13. American Academy of Periodontology. Glossary of periodontal terms, 4th edition. Chicago: American Academy of Periodontology, 2001.
  14. Senna P, Del Bel Cury AA, Rösing C. Non-carious cervical lesions and occlusion: A systematic review of clinical studies. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39(6):450–462. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02290.x.
  15. Nassar HM, Hara AT. Effect of dentifrice slurry abrasivity and erosive challenge on simulated non-carious cervical lesions development in vitro. J Oral Sci 2021;63(2):191–194. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.20-0478.
  16. Yoshizaki KT, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF, Sobral MA, et al. Clinical features and factors associated with non-carious cervical lesions and dentin hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 2017;44(2):112–118. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12469.
  17. Medeiros TLM, Mutran SCAN, Espinosa DG, et al. Prevalence and risk indicators of non-carious cervical lesions in male footballers. BMC Oral Health 2020;20(1):215. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01200-9.
  18. Michael JA, Townsend GC, Greenwood LF, et al. Abfraction: Separating fact from fiction. Aust Dent J 2009;54(1):2–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.01080.x.
  19. Haralur SB, Alqahtani AS, AlMazni MS, et al. Association of non-Carious cervical lesions with oral hygiene habits and dynamic occlusal parameters. Diagnostics (Basel) 2019;9(2):43. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics9020043.
  20. De Araújo KG, Câmara JVF, Ribeiro MST, et al. Prevalence of non-carious cervical injuries and their associations with risk factors: Integrative literature review. Res So Dev 2022;11(3):e57411326645. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26645.
  21. Leme M, Barbosa T, Castelo P, et al. Associations between psychological factors and the presence of deleterious oral habits in children and adolescents. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;38(4):313–317. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.38.4.c48238322205466w.
  22. Rodríguez-Olivos LHG, Chacón-Uscamaita PR, Quinto-Argote AG, et al. Deleterious oral habits related to vertical, transverse and sagittal dental malocclusion in pediatric patients. BMC Oral Health 2022;22(1):88. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02122-4.
  23. Hayashi M, Kubo S, Pereira PN, et al. Progression of non-carious cervical lesions: 3D Morphological analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2022;26(1):575–583. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04036-x.
  24. Pintado MR, Anderson GC, DeLong R, et al. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77(3):313–320. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70189-6.
  25. Khan SI, Rao D, Ramachandran A, et al. Influence of personality traits on the intensity of maximum voluntary bite force in adults. Indian J Dent Res 2020;31(5):706–711. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_517_19.
  26. Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, et al. Effects of ethnicity, gender and age on clenching force and load distribution. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5(1):63–68. DOI: 10.1007/s007840000099.
  27. Helkimo E, Carlsson GR, Helkimo M. Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand. 1977;35(6):297–303. DOI: 10.3109/00016357709064128.
  28. Bakke M, Holm B, Jensen BL, et al. Unilateral, isometric bite force in 8–68-year-old women and men related to occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98(2):149–158. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00954.x.
  29. Al-Gunaid TH, Sunitan AK, Alharbi AB, et al. Relationship between mandibular dimensions and bite force: An exploratory study. Orthod Waves 2021;80(3):117–123. DOI:
  30. Koç D, Dogan A, Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: A literature review. Eur J Dent 2010;4(2):223–232. PMID: 20396457.
  31. Alkan A, Keskiner I, Arici S, et al. The effect of periodontitis on biting abilities. J Periodontol 2006;77(8):1442–1445. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.060025.
  32. Kosaka T, Ono T, Kida M, et al. Deterioration of periodontal status affects declines in masticatory performance: The Suita study. J Clin Periodontol 2021;48(9):1208–1215. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13515.
  33. Pereira-Cenci T, Pereira LJ, Cenci MS, et al. Maximal bite force and its association with temporomandibular disorders. Braz Dent J 2007;18(1):65–68. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402007000100014.
  34. Moleirinho-Alves PM, Cebola PM, Dos Santos PD, et al. Effects of therapeutic and aerobic exercise programs on pain, neuromuscular activation, and bite force in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Pers Med 2021;11(11):1170. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111170.
  35. Gu Y, Bai Y, Xie X. Bite force transducers and measurement devices. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021;9:665081. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.665081.
  36. Dinsdale A, Liang Z, Thomas L, et al. Are jaw range of motion, muscle function and proprioception impaired in adults with persistent temporomandibular disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2020;47(11):1448–1478. DOI: 10.1111/joor.13090.
  37. Dıraçoğlu D, Alptekin K, Cifter ED, et al. Relationship between maximal bite force and tooth wear in bruxist and non-bruxist individuals. Arch Oral Biol 2011;56(12):1569–1575. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.06.019.
  38. Lan TH, Chen PH, Fok AS, et al. Contact fracture test of monolithic hybrid ceramics on different substrates for bruxism. Dent Mater 2022;38(1):44–56. DOI: 10.1016/
  39. Sivrikaya E, Güler MS, Bekci M. Evaluation of stress distributions of zirconia connecting screw in bruxism: A finite element analysis. Selcuk Dent J 2021;8(3):617–622. DOI: 10.15311/selcukdentj.729494.
  40. Braun S, Bantleon HP, Hnat WP, et al. A study of bite force, Part 1: Relationship to various physical characteristics. Angle Orthod 1995; 65(5):367–372. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0367:ASOBFP >2.0.CO;2.
  41. Kruse T, Lehmann HC, Brauman B, et al. The maximum bite force for treatment evaluation in severely affected adult SMA patients - Protocol for a longitudinal study. Front Neurol 2020;11:139. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00139.
  42. Edmonds HM, Glowacka H. The ontogeny of maximum bite force in humans. Anat 2020;237(3):529–542. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13218.
  43. Soni R, Yadav H, Pathak A, et al. Comparative evaluation of biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept with other treatment modalities in completely edentulous individuals. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2020;20(3):312–320. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_464_19.
  44. Van Der Bilt A, Tekamp A, Van Der Glas H, et al. Bite force and electromyograpy during maximum unilateral and bilateral clenching. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116(3):217–222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00531.x.
  45. Bonakdarchian M, Askari N, Askari M. Effect of face form on maximal molar bite force with natural dentition. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54(3): 201–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.11.009.
  46. Nascimento BL, Vieira AR, Bezamat M, et al. Occlusal problems, mental health issues and non-carious cervical lesions. Odontology 2022;110(2):349–355. DOI: 10.1007/s10266-021-00658-5.
  47. Hussain AS, Melibari R, Al Toubity MJ, et al. Diagnosis of non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Dent Rev 2021;5(1):1–9. DOI:
  48. Sawlani K, Lawson NC, Burgess JO, et al. Factors influencing the progression of noncarious cervical lesions: A 5-year prospective clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115(5):571–577. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.021.
  49. Kitasako Y, Ikeda M, Takagaki T, et al. The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) with or without erosive etiological factors among adults of different ages in Tokyo. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25(12):6939–6947. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03984-8.
  50. Hashimoto S, Kosaka T, Nakai M, et al. A lower maximum bite force is a risk factor for developing cardiovascular disease: The Suita study. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):7671. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87252-5.
  51. Manzon L, Vozza I, Poli O. Bite force in elderly with full natural dentition and different rehabilitation prosthesis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(4):1424. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041424.
  52. Koç D, Doğan A, Bek B. Effect of gender, facial dimensions, body mass index and type of functional occlusion on bite force. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19(3):274–279. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000300017.
  53. Calderon PS, Kogawa EM, Lauris JR, et al. The influence of gender and bruxism on the human maximum bite force. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14(6):448–453. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000600011.
  54. Linderholm H, Lindqvist B, Ringqvist M, et al. Isometric bite force in children and its relation to body build and general muscle force. Acta Odontol Scand 1971;29(5):563–568. DOI: 10.3109/00016357109026334.
  55. Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Carmeli Y. Bite force and oral function in patients with disturbances of the masticatory system. J Oral Rehabil 1975;2:397–406. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1975.tb01539.x.
  56. Kendre S, Kamble S, Ambekar A, et al. A Comparative study between facial growth pattern and dental arch width and form in regional population – an in vitro study. Annals of R.S.C.B 2021;25(4)15263–15276. Available from:
  57. Shetty SK. Decoding the link between Dental Arch Dimensions and Vertical Facial Morphology in Class II Div 1 Subjects. Saudi J Oral Dent Res 2021;6(12):530–542. DOI: 10.36348/sjodr.2021.v06i12.002.
  58. Turkistani KA, Alkayyal MA, Abbassy MA, et al. Comparison of occlusal bite force distribution in subjects with different occlusal characteristics. Cranio 2020;1–8. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1830662.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.