The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2023 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Using Stock Alloplastic Graft in the Treatment of Ankylosis- A Case Report

Anuradha Navaneetham, Vaibhav Nagaraj, P Satish Kumaran, Bindu Channabasappa, Daisy Loyola, Romir Navaneetham

Keywords : Ankylosis, Biomet Stock devices, Temporomandibular Joint replacement

Citation Information : Navaneetham A, Nagaraj V, Kumaran PS, Channabasappa B, Loyola D, Navaneetham R. Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Using Stock Alloplastic Graft in the Treatment of Ankylosis- A Case Report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (2):113-119.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3489

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 23-05-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction: This paper aims to assess the suitability and effectiveness of temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) devices to treat a case of re-ankylosis and association of tuberculosis (TB) with reduced mouth opening. Traditional protocols for the treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis have preferred autologous grafts for reconstruction. Usage of TMJR devices have been reserved for very specific conditions. Case report: We present a case of a patient previously treated for ankylosis using a sternoclavicular graft, who came with a chief complaint of progressive decrease in mouth opening. She also gave a history of pulmonary TB a year back. Investigations revealed no active TB. Images and clinical presentation were consistent with bilateral ankylosis. The treatment plan consisted of resection of ankylotic mass on the left side and removal of the failed graft and reconstruction with Biomet stock TMJR prosthesis on the left side. Discussion: Stock device has proven to be reliable option in planned TMJR procedures. Osteoarticular TB should be ruled out in patients with a history and features of TB. Conclusion: Stock TMJR devices are an effective and viable option for the treatment of re-ankylosis. This ensures almost immediate possibility of physiotherapy and long-term results including maintenance of mouth opening and function. Osteoarticular TB can cause trismus and painful joints which may be misdiagnosed. Any patient with reduced mouth opening with a history of TB should be investigated for possible extrapulmonary TB.

PDF Share
  1. Gerber S, Saeed N. Predictive risk factors for persistent pain following total prosthetic temporomandibular joint replacement. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;60(5):650–654. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021. 11.010.
  2. Sahdev R, Wu BW, Anderson N, et al. A retrospective study of patient outcomes after temporomandibular joint replacement with alloplastic total joint prosthesis at Massachusetts General Hospital. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77(2):280–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.09.002.
  3. Higginson J, Panayides C, Speculand B, et al. Modification of an extended total temporomandibular joint replacement (eTMJR) classification system. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;60(7):983–986. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.03.011.
  4. Rajkumar A, Sidebottom AJ. Prospective study of the long-term outcomes and complications after total temporomandibular joint replacement: analysis at 10 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;51(5):665–668. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.07.021.
  5. Westermark A. Total reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint. Up to 8 years of follow-up of patients treated with Biomet(®) total joint prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39(10):951–955. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.05.010.
  6. Upadya VH, Bhat HK, Rao BHS, et al. Classification and surgical management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: A review. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;47(4):239–248. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.4.239.
  7. Amarista FJ, Jones JP, Brown Z, et al. Outcomes of total joint alloplastic reconstruction in TMJ ankylosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2022;134(2):135–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.12.121.
  8. Yadav P, Roychoudhury A, Kumar RD, et al. Total alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2021;20(4):515–526. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-021-01628-8.
  9. Mercuri LG. A rationale for total alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction in the management of idiopathic/progressive condylar resorption. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65(8):1600–1609. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.056. Erratum in: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(1):208.
  10. Bach E, Sigaux N, Fauvernier M, et al. Reasons for failure of total temporomandibular joint replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;51(8):1059–1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.12.012.
  11. Towdur GN, Upasi AP, Veerabhadrappa UK, et al. A rare, unusual presentation of primary tuberculosis in the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76(4):806–811. DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2017.09.010.
  12. Park HJ, Kim BC, Choi EJ, et al. Tuberculosis of the temporomandibular joint: A case of misdiagnosis. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28(2):165–170. DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1061.
  13. Kaban LB, Perrott DH, Fisher K. A protocol for management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:1145–1151.
  14. Briceno WX, Milkovich J, El-Rabbany M, et al. Reconstruction of large defects using extended temporomandibular joint patient-matched prostheses. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;80(6):1018–1032. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.01.021.
  15. Beret M, Nicot R, Gutman L, et al. Quality of life after total temporomandibular joint prothesis surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2022;33(7):2134–2137 DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008691.
  16. Giannakopoulos HE, Sinn DP, Quinn PD. Biomet Micro fixation temporo-mandibular joint replacement system: a 3-year follow-up study of patients treated during 1995–2005. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:787–794. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.031.
  17. Jones RH. Temporomandibular joint reconstruction with total alloplastic joint replacement. Aust Dent J 2011;56:85–914. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01288.x.
  18. Helbling CA, Lieger O, Smolka W, et al. Primary tuberculosis of the TMJ: presentation of a case and literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39(8):834–838. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.023.
  19. Wolford LM, Mercuri LG, Schneiderman ED, et al. Twenty-year follow-up study on a patient-fitted temporomandibular joint prosthesis: The Techmedica/TMJ Concepts Device. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73(5):952–960. DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2014.10.032.
  20. Kanatas AN, Jenkins GW, Smith AB, et al. Changes in pain and mouth opening at 1 year following temporomandibular joint replacement – a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;49:455–458. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.07.017.
  21. Leandro LFL, Ono HY, De Souza Loureiro CC, et al. A ten-year experience and follow-up of three hundred patients fitted with the Biomet/Lorenz Microfixation TMJ replacement system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42(8):1007–1013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.04.018.
  22. Wolford LM, Pitta MC, Reiche-Fischel O, et al. TMJ concepts/Techmedica custom-made TMJ total joint prosthesis: 5-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;32(3):268–274. DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0350.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.