The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Efficacy of Chitosan Scaffolded Calcium Silicate-based Cements for Treating Internal Resorption Defects with Perforation: In Vitro Study

Gheerthana Venkatesh, Dakshayani Balaji

Keywords : Biodentine, Calcium silicate cements, Chitosan scaffold, Internal resorption, Perforating resorption, Scanning electron microscope

Citation Information : Venkatesh G, Balaji D. Efficacy of Chitosan Scaffolded Calcium Silicate-based Cements for Treating Internal Resorption Defects with Perforation: In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (5):314-319.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3504

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 07-07-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of chitosan scaffold combined with calcium silicate cements in the management of internal resorption with perforation. Materials and methods: Internal resorption cavities were simulated in 20 human permanent maxillary incisors that were then divided into two groups: group I – biodentine and group II – chitosan scaffold combined with biodentine. The samples were evaluated for the mineralization activity at the end of the 7th day and 14th day using scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X-ray (SEM–EDX) analysis. The data were recorded, tabulated, and then statistically analyzed. Results: From the SEM–EDX analysis, the mean score of calcium and phosphorus ion uptake by the material was obtained. Statistical analysis by nonparametric Mann–Whitney test showed that there was statistically significant difference in calcium ion uptake at the end of the 7th day (p = 0.016) and at the end of 14th day (p = 0.043) between the group biodentine and group chitosan scaffold combined with biodentine (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In this present study, the use of chitosan scaffolds combined with biodentine showed a statistically significant difference in the mineralization activity when compared with pure biodentine. These scaffolded biomaterials exhibited greater potential for mineralization in vitro which can be efficiently used for the management of teeth with internal resorption with perforation. Further clinical trials are required for the understanding of their behavior in real-world scenarios. Clinical significance: Calcium silicate cements have often exhibited defective hard tissue barrier formation and hence there is a pressing need to search for newer biomaterials that can overcome these shortcomings. Scaffolded biomaterials provide a controlled microcellular environment for bioactivity, and they were found to be efficient in the remineralization of tooth structure. The present study findings indicate that these chitosan scaffolds can be efficiently used in combination with calcium silicate cements for the management of internal resorption with perforation to enhance the treatment outcome.

  1. AAE special committee of full-time educators. Glossary of Endodontic Terms 2016. Gloss Endod Terms 2015;9:43.
  2. Wedenberg C, Zetterqvist L. Internal resorption in human teeth–a histological, scanning electron microscopic, and enzyme histochemical study. J Endod 1987;13(6):255–259. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80041-9.
  3. Nilsson E, Bonte E, Bayet F, et al. Management of internal root resorption on permanent teeth. Int J Dent 2013;2013:929486. DOI: 10.1155/2013/929486.
  4. Abdullah D, Eziana Hussein F, Abd Ghani H. Management of perforating idiopathic internal root resorption. Iran Endod J 2017;12(12): 257–260. DOI: 10.22037/iej.2017.50.
  5. Kaur M, Singh H, Dhillon JS, et al. MTA versus biodentine: Review of literature with a comparative analysis. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(8):ZG01–ZG05. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25840.10374.
  6. Chaudhari PS, Chandak MG, Jaiswal AA, et al. A breakthrough in the era of calcium silicate-based cements: A critical review. Cureus 2022;14(8):e28562. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28562.
  7. Levengood SL, Zhang M. Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B 2014;2(21):3161–3184. DOI: 10.1039/C4TB00027G.
  8. Sarris K, Stergiou Y, Mikrogeorgis G, et al. Examination of irrigant flow on a tooth with internal root resorption by using a computational fluid dynamics model. Eur Endod J 2021;6(2):177–182. DOI: 10.14744/eej.2021.29290.
  9. Malhotra S, Hegde M. Analysis of marginal seal of ProRoot MTA, MTAangelus biodentine, and glass ionomer cement as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study. J Oral Res Rev 2015;7(2):44–49. DOI: 10.4103/2249-4987.172493.
  10. Butt N, Talwar S, Chaudhry S, et al. Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. Indian J Dent Res Off Publ Indian Soc Dent Res 2014;25(6):692–697. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.152163.
  11. Baroudi K, Samir S. Sealing ability of MTA used in perforation repair of permanent teeth; literature review. Open Dent J 2016;10:278–286. DOI: 10.2174/1874210601610010278.
  12. Adl A, Javanmardi S, Abbaszadegan A. Assessment of tooth discoloration induced by biodentine and white mineral trioxide aggregate in the presence of blood. J Conserv Dent 2019;22(2): 164–168. PMCID: PMC6519179.
  13. Saghiri MA, Orangi J, Asatourian A, et al. Calcium silicate-based cements and functional impacts of various constituents. Dent Mater J 2017;36(1):8–18. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2015-425.
  14. Singh H, Kaur M, Markan S, et al. Biodentine: A promising dentin substitute. JBR J Interdiscip Med Dent Sci 2014;2014. DOI: 10.4172/2376-032X.1000140.
  15. Camilleri J. The chemical composition of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Conserv Dent 2008;11(4):141–143. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.48834.
  16. Moioli EK, Clark PA, Xin X, et al. Matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in dental, oral and craniofacial tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007;59(4–5):308–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.03.019.
  17. Farzin A, Bahrami N, Mohamadnia A, et al. Scaffolds in dental tissue engineering: A review. Arch Neurosci 2020;7(1):e97014. DOI: 10.5812/ans.97014.
  18. Moussa DG, Aparicio C. Present and future of tissue engineering scaffolds for dentin-pulp complex regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2019;13(1):58–75. DOI: 10.1002/term.2769.
  19. Vallés-Lluch A, Campillo-Fernández AJ, Gallego Ferrer G, et al. Bioactive scaffolds mimicking natural dentin structure. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;90(1):182–194. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31272.
  20. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Rueggeberg FA, et al. Calcium phosphate phase transformation produced by the interaction of the portland cement component of white mineral trioxide aggregate with a phosphate-containing fluid. J Endod 2007;33(11):1347–1351. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen. 2007.07.008.
  21. Ghilotti J, Sanz JL, López-García S, et al. Comparative surface morphology, chemical composition, and cytocompatibility of Bio-C repair, biodentine, and ProRoot MTA on hDPCs. Materials (Basel) 2020;13(9):2189. DOI: 10.3390/ma13092189.
  22. Sultankulov B, Berillo D, Sultankulova K, et al. Progress in the development of chitosan-based biomaterials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomolecules 2019;9(9):470. DOI: 10.3390/biom9090470.
  23. Dorozhkin SV, Epple M. Biological and medical significance of calcium phosphates. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2002;41(17):3130–3146. DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020902)41:17 < 3130::AID-ANIE3130>3.0.CO;2-1.
  24. Lynch RJM, Mony U, ten Cate JM. Effect of lesion characteristics and mineralizing solution type on enamel remineralization in vitro. Caries Res 2007;41(4):257–262. DOI: 10.1159/000101914.
  25. Budiraharjo R, Neoh KG, Kang ET, et al. Bioactivity of novel carboxymethyl chitosan scaffold incorporating MTA in a tooth model. Int Endod J 2010;43(10):930–939. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01771.x.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.