The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Does the Protrusion of Corticobasal Implants in the Maxillary Sinuses Affect Sinus Health? A Retrospective Study

Abdelnasir G Ahmad, Motaz Osman, Lukasz Palka

Keywords : Atrophic ridges, Corticobasal implants, Maxillary sinus, Protrusion, Retrospective study

Citation Information : Ahmad AG, Osman M, Palka L. Does the Protrusion of Corticobasal Implants in the Maxillary Sinuses Affect Sinus Health? A Retrospective Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (6):357-363.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3521

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-07-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Aim: The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the effect of corticobasal implant penetration in the nasal and maxillary sinuses on sinus health and implant survival rate in cases of severely atrophid ridges. Materials and methods: This retrospective study was conducted on thirty patients with 172 implants who underwent corticobasal implant treatment between 2014 and 2018. Implants were divided into two groups according to the penetration depths (Group A, <4 mm; Group B, 4 mm). Inclusion criteria for the study included: (A) patients with severe maxillary ridge resorption with an immediately loaded corticobasal implant-supported prosthesis that showed implant protrusion inside the maxillary sinus on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT); and (B) patients with a preoperative and postoperative follow-up CBCT scan using the same standard technique and machine. (C) Patients without any history of sinusitis before implant insertion patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recalled for follow-up. The presence of sinus complications was clinically assessed according to the clinical practice guidelines for adult sinusitis of the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery and Radiologically using CBCT. Moreover, patient satisfaction was evaluated using yes-or-no questions. The result was statistically analyzed using Fisher's Exact test. Results: Despite the differences in implant penetration depths, no clinical signs of sinusitis were evident in any patient. One patient presented with transient epistaxis after the surgery, and 2 patients with nine implants revealed nonsignificant thickening of the sinus membrane radiologically (p = 0.055). All implants showed optimum bone-implant contact with a 100% survival rate. A significant relationship was reported between the thickness of the membrane and the patient's gender, hypertension, and smoking habits. (p = 0.001*, p = 0.002*, and p = 0.034*, respectively). Conclusion: Penetration of corticobasal implants in the maxillary sinus did not compromise the health of the maxillary sinus or implant survival rate. Clinical significance: Limited posterior maxillary bony support and maxillary sinus pneumatization present challenges in implant dentistry and increase the possibility of implant protrusion inside the maxillary and nasal cavities. Hence, studying the effect of this protrusion on the maxillary sinuses’ health and implant survival is highly significant.

  1. Ragucci GM, Elnayef B, Suárez-López Del Amo F, et al. Influence of exposing dental implants into the sinus cavity on survival and complications rate: A systematic review. Int J Implant Dent 2019;5(1):6. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-019-0157-7.
  2. Awadalkreem F, Ahmad AG, Ihde S, et al. Effects of corticobasal implant protrusion inside the nasal and maxillary sinus. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2020;10(1):114–121. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_42_20.
  3. Jung JH, Choi BH, Jeong SM, et al. A retrospective study of the effects on sinus complications of exposing dental implants to the maxillary sinus cavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103(5):623–625. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.09.024.
  4. Abi Najm S, Malis D, El Hage M, et al. Potential adverse events of endosseous dental implants penetrating the maxillary sinus: Long-term clinical evaluation. Laryngoscope 2013;123(12):2958–2961. DOI: 10.1002/lary.24189.
  5. Jung JH, Choi BH, Zhu SJ, et al. The effects of exposing dental implants to the maxillary sinus cavity on sinus complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102(5):602–605. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.061.
  6. Ali SA, Karthigeyan S, Deivanai M, et al. Implant rehabilitation for atrophic maxilla: A review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014;14(3): 196–207. DOI: 10.1007/s13191-014-0360-4.
  7. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:237–259. PMID: 19885448.
  8. Starch-Jensen T, Nielsen HB. Prosthetic rehabilitation of the partially edentulous atrophic posterior mandible with short implants (≤8 mm) compared with the sandwich osteotomy and delayed placement of standard length implants (>8 mm): A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2018;9(2):e2. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2018.9202.
  9. Soto-Penaloza D, Zaragozí-Alonso R, Penarrocha-Diago M, et al. The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(3):e474–e488. DOI: 10.4317/jced.53613.
  10. Morgano AT. Functional load in oblique bicortical implants: Parasinusal implants and palatine implants. J Oral Implantol 2013;39(4):467–474. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00121.1.
  11. Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, Moreno A, et al. Implants in the zygomatic bone for maxillary prosthetic rehabilitation: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43(6):748–757. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.01.004.
  12. Sharma A, Rahul GR. Zygomatic implants/fixture: A systematic review. J Oral Implantol 2013;39(2):215–224. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00055.
  13. Bocklage R. Advanced alveolar crest atrophy: An alternative treatment technique for maxilla and mandible. Implant Dent 2001;10(1):30–35. DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200101000-00009.
  14. Ihde S, Kopp S, Maier T. Comparison of implant survival with implants placed in acceptable and compromised bone: A literature review. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2009;8(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-009-0001-3.
  15. Ihde S, Ihde A. Immediate Loading Guideline to Successful Implantology. Munich, Germany: International Implant Foundation Publishing; 2010. 2nd ed, pp. 2–12.
  16. Scortecci G. Basal Implantology. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44873-2.
  17. Ihde S. Indications and treatment modalities with corticobasal jaw implants. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2019;9(2):379–386. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_142_19.
  18. Pałka ŁR, Lazarov A. Immediately loaded bicortical implants inserted in fresh extraction and healed sites in patients with and without a history of periodontal disease. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2019;9(2):371–378. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_147_19.
  19. Lazarov A. A prospective cohort study of maxillary sinus complications in relation to treatments with strategic implants® penetrating into the sinus. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2020;10(2):365–369. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_85_20.
  20. Osman M, Ahmad AG, Awadalkreem F. A Novel approach for rehabilitation of a subtotal maxillectomy patient with immediately loaded basal implant-supported prosthesis: 4 years follow-up. Case Rep Dent 2020;2020:9650164. DOI: 10.1155/2020/9650164.
  21. Gaur V, Perumal SM, Rahmaan F, et al. A practical approach to orofacial rehabilitation in a patient after inferior maxillectomy and rhinectomy with mono framework construction supported on a zygomatic implant placed in the glabella: A case report. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;43(1):25. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-021-00312-8.
  22. Patel K, Madan S, Mehta D, et al. Basal implants: An asset for rehabilitation of atrophied resorbed maxillary and mandibular jaw - A prospective study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2021;11(1):64–69. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_446_20.
  23. Awadalkreem F, Khalifa N, Ahmad AG, et al. Rehabilitation of marginal mandibulectomy patients using immediately loaded basal implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol 2022;34(1):24–35. DOI:
  24. Awadalkreem F, Khalifa N, Satti A, et al. Rehabilitation of patients with compromised ridge support using immediately loaded corticobasal implant-supported prostheses: A prospective observational study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022;23(10):971–978. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3416.
  25. Gosai H, Anchlia S, Patel K, et al. Versatility of basal cortical screw implants with immediate functional loading. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2022;21(3):824–832. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-021-01638-6.
  26. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38(8):613–616. PMID: 6993637.
  27. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15(2):152, 154–156, 158 passim; quiz 162. PMID: 8055503.
  28. Al-Salman WT, Almas K. Maxillary sinus and success of dental implants: An update. Gen Dent 2015;63(4):47–54. PMID: 26147168.
  29. Stacchi C, Andolsek F, Berton F, et al. Intraoperative complications during sinus floor elevation with lateral approach: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32(3):e107–e118. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4884.
  30. Beck-Broichsitter BE, Gerle M, Wiltfang J, et al. Perforation of the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation: A risk factor for long-term success of dental implants? Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;24(2):151–156. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-020-00829-8.
  31. Petruson B. Sinuscopy in patients with titanium implants in the nose and sinuses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2004;38(2):86–93. DOI: 10.1080/02844310310023909.
  32. Tabrizi R, Amid R, Taha Özkan B, et al. Effects of exposing dental implant to the maxillary sinus cavity. J Cranio 2012;23(3):767–769. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dbd19.
  33. Zhong W, Chen B, Liang X, et al. Experimental study on penetration of dental implants into the maxillary sinus in different depths. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21(6):560–566. DOI: 10.1590/1679-775720130078.
  34. Kim HY, Yang JY, Chung BY, et al. Peri-implant bone length changes and survival rates of implants penetrating the sinus membrane at the posterior maxilla in patients with limited vertical bone height. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43(2):58–63. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2013. 43.2.58.
  35. Nooh N. Effect of schneiderian membrane perforation on posterior maxillary implant survival. J Int Oral Health 2013;5(3):28–34. PMID: 24155599.
  36. Ghnaem A, Gad HM. The influence of exposing dental implants to the maxillary sinus cavity on sinus complications and implant survival rate: 6 years prospective follow-up. Egypt Dent J 2014;60(3):2–9.
  37. Elhamruni LM, Marzook HA, Ahmed WM, et al. Experimental study on penetration of dental implants into the maxillary sinus at different depths. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;20(3):281–287. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-016-0568-z.
  38. Shihab OI. Intentional penetration of dental implants into the maxillary sinus: A retrospective study. Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences (Zanco J Med Sci) 2017;21(1):1536–1539. DOI:10.15218/zjms.2017.001.
  39. Rosenfeld RM, Piccirillo JF, Chandrasekhar SS, et al. Clinical practice guideline (update): Adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;152(2 Suppl):S1–S39. DOI: 10.1177/0194599815572097.
  40. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: The international congress of oral implantologists (icoi) pisa consensus conference. Implant Dent 2008;17(1):5–15. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059.
  41. Strassburger C, Heydecke G, Kerschbaum T. Influence of prosthetic and implant therapy on satisfaction and quality of life: A systematic literature review. Part 1-Characteristics of the studies. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(1):83–93. PMID: 15008238.
  42. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of mono-and bicortical anchorage on the integration of titanium implants. A study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25(3):229–235. DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(96)80036-1.
  43. Strecha J, Jurkovic R, Siebert T, et al. Fixed bicortical screw and blade implants as a non-standard solution to an edentulous (toothless) mandible. Int J Oral Sci 2010;2(2):105–110. DOI: 10.4248/IJOS10030.
  44. Antonina I, Lazarov A, Gaur V, et al. Consensus regarding 16 recognized and clinically proven methods and sub-methods for placing corticobasal® oral implants. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2020;10(2):457–462. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_62_20.
  45. Monje A, Diaz KT, Aranda L, et al. Schneiderian membrane thickness and clinical implications for sinus augmentation: A systematic review and meta-regression analyses. J Periodontol 2016;87(8):888–899. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2016.160041.
  46. Munakata M, Yamaguchi K, Sato D, et al. Factors influencing the sinus membrane thickness in edentulous regions: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Int J Implant Dent 2021;7(1):16. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00298-y.
  47. Khairnar M, Gaur V. Evidence of bone formation in the nasal floor around polished surface bi-cortical screw implants after indirect nasal lift in an atrophied maxilla: Cone beam computed tomography-based case report. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015;19(2):236–238. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.149941.
  48. Awadalkreem F, Khalifa N, Satti A, et al. The influence of immediately loaded basal implant treatment on patient satisfaction. Int J Dent 2020;2020:6590202. DOI: 10.1155/2020/6590202.
  49. Lazarov AB. The impact of diabetes, smoking, and periodontitis on patients’ oral health related quality of life after treatment with corticobasal implants - An evaluative study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2021;11(2):253–260. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_191_21.
  50. Aggarwal S. Assessment of quality of life and clinical performance of immediately loaded basal implants in prosthetic rehabilitation of resorbed ridges: A clinico-radiographic study. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2022;12:1–7. DOI: 10.54608.annalsmedical.2022.06.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.