The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Assessing Adherence to Provider's Recommendations in Caries Risk Assessment and Management: A Retrospective Data Review

Marina Morgan, Karmen Battikha, Sossana Hanna, Renu Aggarwal, Mina Hekmat, Seth Wiafe

Keywords : Adherence caries risk assessment, Diet, Fluoride

Citation Information : Morgan M, Battikha K, Hanna S, Aggarwal R, Hekmat M, Wiafe S. Assessing Adherence to Provider's Recommendations in Caries Risk Assessment and Management: A Retrospective Data Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (6):409-413.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3527

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-07-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Aim: To evaluate the distribution of caries risk category of patients at a dental institution and determine adherence to providers’ recommendations. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional retrospective review of 1,235 patients records that included data collection on demographics, the sum of the number of decayed, missing due to caries, and filled teeth in the permanent teeth (DMFT), presence of frequent snacking, stimulated salivary flow rate, stimulated saliva pH, saliva buffering capacity, biofilm activity, caries risk category, anti-caries prescription accept/decline, and change in the caries risk category. Statistical analysis was carried out through Pearson's Chi-squared test and linear model ANOVA with a significance level of 0.05. Results: Pearson's Chi-squared test showed a statistically significant difference in frequency by risk category (p < 0.001) indicating that patients were skewed toward high and extreme caries risk. Linear model ANOVA showed that higher risk categories were associated with lower salivary flow rates (p = 0.010) and higher biofilm activity (p < 0.001). About, 1 out of 3 patients were reported to have frequent snacking (N = 391, 32%). Frequent snacking patients were more likely to present with higher caries risk assessment (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), and female (p < 0.001). Despite recommendations from the dental student provider, only 27% accepted the anti-cavity prescriptions while 61% declined the recommendation. Conclusion: Distribution of caries risk category is not evenly distributed, but rather skewed toward high and extreme caries risk levels. Despite the identified risks, there is low adherence to the recommendations provided by healthcare providers. The results underscore the necessity for targeted interventions and initiatives aimed at fostering behavioral changes to enhance oral health outcomes. Clinical significance: There is a high need for targeted interventions and initiatives that promote behavioral changes to enhance oral health outcomes.

  1. Marsh PD. Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology 2003;149:279–294. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.26082-0.
  2. Bagramian RA, Garcia-Godoy F, Volpe AR. The global increase in dental caries. A pending public health crisis. Am J Dent 2009; 22(1):3–8. PMID: 19281105.
  3. Healthy People 2030. Building a healthier future for all. Accessed July 20, 2023.
  4. Dye BA, Tan S, Smith V, et al. Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Vital Health Stat 2007;(248):1–92. PMID: 17633507.
  5. Fontana M, Pilcher L, Tampi MP, et al. Caries management for the modern age: improving practice one guideline at a time. JADA 2018;149(11):935–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.09.004.
  6. Maheswari SU, Raja J, Kumar A, et al. Caries management by risk assessment: a review on current strategies for caries prevention and management. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015;7(Suppl 2):S320–S324. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.163436.
  7. Su N, Lagerweij MD, van der Heijden GJMG. Assessment of predictive performance of caries risk assessment models based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2021;110:103664. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103664.
  8. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on caries-risk assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents. Reference Manual 2014;37(6):15–16.
  9. American Dental Association. Caries form (Patients >6). 2008. Available at: Accessed July 20, 2023.
  10. Featherstone JDB, Chaffee BW. The evidence for caries management by risk assessment (CAMBRA!). Adv Dent Res 2018;29(1):9–14. DOI: 10.1177/0022034517736500.
  11. Bartold PM, Ivanovski S. P4 Medicine as a model for precision periodontal care. Clin Oral Investig 2022;26(9):5517–5533. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04469-y.
  12. Fontana M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C. Minimal intervention dentistry part 2. Caries risk assessment in adults. Br Dent J 2012;213:447–451. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.1008.
  13. Iqbal A, Khattak O, Chaudhary FA, et al. Caries risk assessment using the caries management by risk assessment (CAMBRA) protocol among the general population of Sakaka, Saudi Arabia-A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(3):1215. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031215.
  14. Agouropoulos A, Birpou E, Twetman S, et al. Caries risk assessment with the ‘Bangkok checklist’ in preschool children: a prospective cohort study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2022;32(1):82–89. DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12794.
  15. Sebastian RS, Enns CW, Goldman JD. MyPyramid Intakes and Snacking Patterns of U.S. Adults: What We Eat in America, NHANES 2007–2008. 2011 Jun. In: FSRG Dietary Data Briefs [Internet]. Beltsville (MD): United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); 2010–. Dietary Data Brief No. 5.
  16. Winn DM, Brunelle JA, Selwitz RH, et al. Coronal and root caries in the dentition of adults in the United States, 1988–1991. J Dent Res 1996;75 Spec No: 642–651. DOI: 10.1177/002203459607502S04.
  17. Martignon S, Roncalli AG, Alvarez E, et al. Risk factors for dental caries in Latin American and Caribbean countries. Braz Oral Res 2021;35(suppl 01):e053. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0053.
  18. Marinho VC. Applying prescription-strength home-use and professionally applied topical fluoride products may benefit people at high risk for caries – the American Dental Association (ADA) 2013 clinical practice guideline recommendations. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2014;14(3):120–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.07.011.
  19. Gibson G, Jones JA, Wehler CJ, et al. Addressing the discrepancy between efficacy and effectiveness of 1.1% sodium fluoride toothpaste or gel in adults as part of a caries prevention program. J Am Dent Assoc 2023;154(7):541–544:S0002-8177(23)00023-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.01.004.
  20. Wu L, Lo ECM, McGrath C, et al. Motivational interviewing for caries prevention in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(1):585–594. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04037-w.
  21. Franki J, Hayes MJ, Taylor JA. The provision of dietary advice by dental practitioners: a review of the literature. Community Dent Health 2014;31(1):9–14. PMID: 24741887.
  22. Touger-Decker R, Mobley CC, American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: oral health and nutrition. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107(8):1418–1428. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.06.003.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.