Citation Information :
Sahoo N, Amrutha R, Sam G, Thomas L, Naik MK, Ahamad S, Oberoi NH. Ponticulus Posticus: An Important Diagnostic Finding Often Missed in Lateral Cephalograms. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (7):477-480.
Aim: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the presence of the ponticulus posticus (PP) frequently encountered in lateral cephalograms.
Materials and methods: About 500 patients of age 12–40 years were selected whose digital lateral cephalogram was recorded and traced to confirm the presence of the PP and categorize as: (A) Absent, as evidenced by lateral cephalograms. (B) Complete PP evidenced by the presence of circumferential bone bridge that connected the upper articular process to the atlas's posterior arch. (C) Partial PP: presented as a bone spike that protruded from the top articular process or the posterior arch of the atlas and extended above the vertebral artery sulcus. Symptoms of migraine, shoulder discomfort, orofacial pain, and headache were also evaluated on interaction with the patients. Using the Chi-square test, the relationship between the patient's gender and the presence of the PP was assessed. A p-value of 0.05 or less was regarded as statistically significant.
Results: About 10% of the patients reported with the presence of complete variant, 70% with partial variant and rest 20% of patients with neither a partial nor a complete form of PP. There was no statistically significant association between the PP and gender, as indicated by the Chi-square values (3.146; p = 0.526).
Conclusion: On conclusion, according to the findings of the current study, patients with a complete form of PP experience more symptoms than those with a partial form of PP. In both groups, the PP frequency was higher in females.
Clinical significance: In lateral cephalograms, the cervical spine region is typically ignored and given little weight. A common variation of atlas vertebrae is the PP, which is located in the posterior arch of the atlas. The PP exacerbates symptoms, such as migraine, tension headaches, shoulder pain, double vision, vertigo, stroke, and pain in the neck and orofacial region. Therefore, orthodontic specialists serve as initial diagnosticians and direct the patients to qualified physicians so that they can experience symptom relief.
Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:58–66. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70157-5.
Farman AG, Escobar V. Radiographic appearance of the cervical vertebrae in normal and abnormal development. Br J Oral Surg 1982;20:264–274. DOI: 10.1016/s0007-117x(82)80022-x.
Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA, Jr The cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM) method for assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Sem Orthod 2005;11:119–129. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005.
Krishnamurthy A, Nayak SR, Khan S, et al. Arcuate foramen of atlas: incidence, phylogenetic and clinical significance. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2007;48(3):263–266. DOI: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17914493/.
Chitroda PK, Katti G, Baba IA, et al. Ponticulus posticus on the posterior arch of atlas, prevalence analysis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients of gulbarga population. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:3044–3047. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6795.3847.
Schilling J, Schilling A, SuazoGaldames I. Ponticulus posticus on the posterior arch of atlas, prevalence analysis in asymptomatic patients. Int J Morphol 2010;28:317–322. DOI: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/ijmorphol/v28n1/art46.pdf.
Young JP, Young PH, Ackermann MJ, et al. The ponticulus posticus: Implications for screw insertion into the first cervical lateral mass. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(11):2495–2498. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00184.
Wight S, Osborne N, Breen AC. Incidence of ponticulus posterior of the atlas in migraine and cervicogenic headache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22(1):15–20. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70100-4.
Stubbs DM. The arcuate foramen: variability in distribution related to race and sex. Spine 1992;17(12):1502–1504. DOI:10.1097/00007632-199212000-00010.
Hasan M, Shukla S, Siddiqui MS et al. Posterolateral tunnels and ponticuli in human atlas vertebrae. J Anat 2001;199:339–343. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19930339.x.
Simsek S, Yigitkanli K, Comert A, et al. Posterior osseous bridging of C1. J ClinNeurosci 2008;15(6):686–688. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.06.004.
Miki T, Oka M, Urushidani H, et al. Ponticulus Posticus: Its Clinical Significance. Acta Medica Kinki Univ. 1979;4(2):427-430. DOI: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573950401562199168.
Cho YJ. Radiological Analysis of Ponticulus posticus in Koreans. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(1):45–49. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.1.45.
Erdogen U, Nuri E, Harun Ü, et al. Radiographic Incidence of Complete Arcuate Foramen in Turkish Population. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2004;26(2):50–54. DOI: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26437659_Radiographic_incidence_of_complete_arcuate_foramen_in_Turkish_population.
Paraskevas G, Papaziogas B, Tsonidis C, et al. Gross Morphology of The Bridges Over The Vertebral Artery Groove On The Atlas. SurgRadiol Anat. 2005;27(2):129–136. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-004-0300-9.
Taitz C, Nathan H. Some observations on the posterior and lateral bridge of the atlas. ActaAnat (Basel) 1986;127(3):212–217. DOI: 10.1159/000146284.
Takaaki M, Masanori O, Hidenori U, et al. Ponticulus posticus: Its clinical significance. ActaMedica Kinki Univ 1979;4:427–430. DOI: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Acta+Med+Kinki+ Univ&title=Ponticulus+ponticus:+Its+clinical+significance&author= M.+Takaaki&author=O.+Masanori&author=U.+Hidenori&author= H.+Eikazu&author=T.+Seisuke&volume=4&publication_year=1979&pages=427-430&