The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 8 ( August, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

In vivo Evaluation of Shade Replication of Different Generations of Zirconia to Natural Teeth Using Digital Color Determinations

Mohammad Mostafa Rayyan, Lucette Segaan

Keywords : Delta E, Easyshade, Resin cement, Spectrophotometer, Zirconia

Citation Information : Rayyan MM, Segaan L. In vivo Evaluation of Shade Replication of Different Generations of Zirconia to Natural Teeth Using Digital Color Determinations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (8):545-550.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3554

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 13-09-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The color difference between the final shade of restorations milled from different zirconia blocks, and the control teeth in the esthetic zone is yet uncertain. Materials and methods: For eight patients who required a singular maxillary central incisor restoration, twenty-four crowns made of zirconia were created. These were grouped into three categories based on the shade and nature of zirconia (Zr) utilized (white core, colored core, and monolithic high-translucency (ht) Zr crowns). The difference in color (ΔE) between the three zirconia crowns and the neighboring teeth was calculated by the use of Easyshade spectrophotometer. Two shades of resin luting cement were used. The measured ΔE values were evaluated based on a clinically acceptable color difference of 1.6ΔE, which is not visible to the human eye. Results: Among the three groups, no differences of statistical significance were observed in terms of ΔE with different Zr types and resin cement color. Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, the usage of different shades of zirconia blanks and resin cements did not display a statistically significant effect on the final color of the crown. Clinical significance: Changing the shade of resin cements does not appear to add value to the final shade of crown. In addition, the generation of zirconia does not influence the shade of the crown. Crowns made of zirconia can be cemented with opaque or transparent cement with no effect on the final color.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Ishikawa-Nagai S, Yoshida A, Sakai M, et al. Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and all-ceramic crowns. J Dent 2009;37(Suppl 1):e57–e63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.004.
  2. Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, et al. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: A systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23(4):299–309. PMID: 20617217.
  3. Paniz G, Kang KH, Kim Y, et al. Influence of coping design on the cervical color of ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110(6):494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.005.
  4. Shokry TE, Shen C, Elhosary MM, et al. Effect of core and veneer thicknesses on the color parameters of two all-ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95(2):124–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.001.
  5. Massoud YA. A method for fabricating a cast post and core that is esthetic when used under an all-ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(5):553–554. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129302.
  6. Ishikawa-Nagai S, Yoshida A, Da Silva JD, et al. Spectrophotometric analysis of tooth color reproduction on anterior all-ceramic crowns: Part 1: Analysis and interpretation of tooth color. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22(1):42–52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00311.x.
  7. Aboushelib MN, Dozic A, Liem JK. Influence of framework color and layering technique on the final color of zirconia veneered restorations. Quintessence Int 2010;41(5):e84–e89. PMID: 20376368.
  8. Igiel C, Weyhrauch M, Mayer B, et al. Effects of ceramic layer thickness, cement color, and abutment tooth color on color reproduction of feldspathic veneers. Int J Esthet Dent 2018;13(1):110–119. PMID: 29379907.
  9. Atash R, Yordanova A, Cetik S. Effect of coloring of zirconia framework and ceramic veneer on adhesion of interfacial surfaces determined using three-point flexural bonding strength: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31(2):158–160. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5586.
  10. Liu MC, Aquilino SA, Lund PS, et al. Human perception of dental porcelain translucency correlated to spectrophotometric measurements. J Prosthodont 2010;19(3):187–193. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00542.x.
  11. Khurana R, Tredwin CJ, Weisbloom M, et al. A clinical evaluation of the individual repeatability of three commercially available colour measuring devices. Br Dent J 2007;203(12):675–680. DOI: 10.1038/bdj.2007.1108.
  12. Khashayar G, Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, et al. Data comparison between two dental spectrophotometers. Oper Dent 2012;37(1):12–20. DOI: 10.2341/11-161-C.
  13. Karamouzos A, Papadopoulos MA, Kolokithas G, et al. Precision of in vivo spectrophotometric colour evaluation of natural teeth. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34(8):613–621. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01744.x.
  14. Boening KW, Kaestner KI, Luthardt RG, et al. Burs with guide pins for standardized tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 2001;32(3):191–197. PMID: 12066658.
  15. Ashri NY, AlRifaiy MQ, El Metwally A. The effect of gingival retraction cord on periodontal health compared to other gingival retraction procedures: A systematic review. Periodontics Prosthodont 2016;3:3–3.
  16. Kahng LS. Proper restorative material selection, digital processes allow highly esthetic shade match combined with layered porcelain. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2014;35(3):170–173. PMID: 24773196.
  17. Hisbergues M, Vendeville S, Vendeville P. Zirconia: Established facts and perspectives for a biomaterial in dental implantology. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88(2):519–529. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31147.
  18. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68(12):1760–1764. DOI: 10.1177/00220345890680120801.
  19. Cui X, Shen Z, Wang X. Esthetic appearances of anatomic contour zirconia crowns made by additive wet deposition and subtractive dry milling: A self-controlled clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123(3):442–448. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.016.
  20. Arellano Moncayo AM, Peñate L, Arregui M, et al. State of the art of different zirconia materials and their indications According to evidence-based clinical performance: A narrative review. Dent J (Basel) 2023;11(1):18. DOI: 10.3390/dj11010018.
  21. Ghoveizi R, Baghaei M, Tavakolizadeh S, et al. Color match of ultra-translucency multilayer zirconia restorations with different designs and backgrounds. J Prosthodont 2023. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13700.
  22. Hjerppe J, Narhi T, Froberg K, et al. Effect of shading the zirconia framework on biaxial strength and surface microhardness. Acta Odonotol Scand 2008;66(5):262–267. DOI: 10.1080/00016350802247123.
  23. Cubas GB, Camacho GB, Fontes ST, et al. The effect of repeated firings on the color of feldspathic ceramics. Gen Dent 2011;59(3):e116–e120. PMID: 21903532.
  24. Herrguth M, Wichmann M, Reich S. The aesthetics of all-ceramic veneered and monolithic CAD/CAM crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(10):747–752. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01498.x.
  25. Zhao J, Shen Z, Si W, et al. Bi-colored zirconia as dental restoration ceramics. Ceram Int 2013;39(8):9277–9283. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.05.036.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.