The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 8 ( August, 2023 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Exploration and Bibliometric Mapping of Scientific Production on Quality of Life, Social Impact, and Security in Love Relationships in Patients with Dental Prostheses

Antonia Castro Rodríguez, Franco Mauricio, Frank Mayta-Tovalino

Keywords : Bibliometric analysis, Dental protheses, Social impact, Sexual performance

Citation Information : Rodríguez AC, Mauricio F, Mayta-Tovalino F. Exploration and Bibliometric Mapping of Scientific Production on Quality of Life, Social Impact, and Security in Love Relationships in Patients with Dental Prostheses. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (8):570-575.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3545

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 13-09-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To explore and conduct a bibliometric mapping of scientific production on quality of life, social impact, and security in love relationships in patients with dental prostheses. Materials and methods: This study is a bibliometric, retrospective, observational analysis of scientific publications indexed in Scopus from 2017 to 2022. The search was conducted on March 8, 2023, using the MESH thesaurus and a defined search strategy. Fifty-two relevant studies were identified and exported to the SciVal program for further analysis. Various bibliometric indicators were used to analyze scientific production, including number of citations, publication, authorship, institution and collaboration, journal quartile, country of origin, h-index, CiteScore 2020, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), Field Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI), and Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP). Results: Most of the articles (39) were in the highest quality quartiles (Q1 and Q2). Brazil produced a total of 15 scientific publications with a domain-weighted impact of 0.65, while Germany produced a total of 11 publications with a domain-weighted impact of 3.15. The results show that international collaboration (32.7%) and national collaboration (38.5%) are more frequent. The most influential author is Daniel Ralph Reißmann with a total of 72 publications followed by Oliver Schierz with 27 publications. German institutions (University of Hamburg, Leipzig University, and Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) lead in scientific productivity. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (Q1) has the highest number of articles (7) and a citation-to-publication ratio of 14.7. Conclusion: Scientific production on quality of life in patients with dental prostheses is still scarce, although its dissemination is mainly in high-impact scientific journals. Clinical significance: This study provided a deeper understanding of how dental prostheses affect people's lives. This can provide practitioners with valuable information to make clinical treatment decisions to improve quality of life. In addition, it can guide future studies to deepen the understanding of this topic in the clinical setting.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Wang Y, Bäumer D, Ozga AK, et al. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life 10 years after implant placement. BMC Oral Health 2021;21(1):30. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01381-3.
  2. Brügger OE, Bornstein MM, Kuchler U, et al. Implant therapy in a surgical specialty clinic: An analysis of patients, indications, surgical procedures, risk factors, and early failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30(1):151–160. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3769.
  3. Akinyamoju CA, Dosumu OO, Taiwo JO, et al. Oral health-related quality of life: Acrylic versus flexible partial dentures. Ghana Med J 2019;53(2):163–169. DOI: 10.4314/gmj.v53i2.12.
  4. Duong HY, Roccuzzo A, Stähli A, et al. Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant-supported dental prostheses. Periodontology 2000 2022;88(1):201–237. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12419.
  5. Cardoso RG, Melo LA, Barbosa GA, et al. Impact of mandibular conventional denture and overdenture on quality of life and masticatory efficiency. Braz Oral Res 2016;30(1):e102. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0102.
  6. Jenei Á, Sándor J, Hegedűs C, et al. Oral health-related quality of life after prosthetic rehabilitation: A longitudinal study with the OHIP questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015;13:99. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0289-2.
  7. Howe MS, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: A systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J Dent 2019;84:9–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.008.
  8. Hjalmarsson L, Gheisarifar M, Jemt T. A systematic review of survival of single implants as presented in longitudinal studies with a follow-up of at least 10 years. Eur J Oral Implantol 2016;9 Suppl 1:S155–S162. PMID: 27314122.
  9. Cheng CH, Atsuta I, Koyano K, et al. Hypothetical model of how a clinical remount procedure benefits patients with existing dentures: A narrative literature review. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10(6):1067. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061067.
  10. Haraldstad K, Wahl A, Andenæs R, et al. A systematic review of quality-of-life research in medicine and health sciences. Qual Life Res 2019;28(10):2641–2650. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02214-9.
  11. Estoque RC, Togawa T, Ooba M, et al. A review of quality of life (QOL) assessments and indicators: Towards a “QOL-Climate” assessment framework. Ambio 2019;48(6):619–638. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-018-1090-3.
  12. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, et al. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: When immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000 2017;73(1):84–102. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12170.
  13. Gallucci GO, Hamilton A, Zhou W, et al. Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29(Suppl 16):106–134. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13276.
  14. Sailer I, Karasan D, Todorovic A, et al. Prosthetic failures in dental implant therapy. Periodontol 2000 2022;88(1):130–144. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12416.
  15. Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Evaluating dental zirconia. Dent Mater 2019;35(1):15–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.291.
  16. Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. J Dent Res 2018;97(2):140–147. DOI: 10.1177/0022034517737483.
  17. Mao L, Kaizer MR, Zhao M, et al. Graded Ultra-Translucent Zirconia (5Y-PSZ) for Strength and Functionalities. J Dent Res 2018;97(11):1222–1228. DOI: 10.1177/0022034518771287.
  18. Zhang Y, Mai Z, Barani A, et al. Fracture-resistant monolithic dental crowns. Dent Mater 2016;32(3):442–449. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.010.
  19. Yu X, Chen Y, Li Y, et al. A bibliometric mapping study of the literature on oral health-related quality of life. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2023;23(1S):101780. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101780.
  20. Clementino LC, de Souza KSC, Castelo-Branco M, et al. Top 100 most-cited oral health-related quality of life papers: Bibliometric analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2022;50(3):199–205. DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12652.
  21. Shrestha L, Dahal S, Pradhan D, et al. Satisfaction level among patients treated with fixed dental prosthesis in a tertiary care hospital: A descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2020;58(221):15–19. DOI: 10.31729/jnma.4720.
  22. Ilha L, Martins AB, Abegg C. Oral impact on daily performance: Need and use of dental prostheses among Brazilian adults. J Oral Rehabil 2016;43(2):119–126. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12351.
  23. Heydecke G, Thomason JM, Lund JP, et al. The impact of conventional and implant supported prostheses on social and sexual activities in edentulous adults Results from a randomized trial 2 months after treatment. J Dent 2005;33(8):649–657. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.003.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.