Analysis of the Facial Measurements and Dental Arch Dimensions for the Construction of Dental Prostheses among Adult Yemenis
Samar Sadeq Abdulrahman Alaghbari, Badea Saeed Abdu Mohmmed, Nadhra Nasser Masood Alalwani, Mohamed M Sobhy, Khawla Ahmed Qadi, Salma Arar Khawaji, Hasan OH Mhbob, Fahad M Alsadi, Mohammed M Al Moaleem
Citation Information :
Alaghbari SS, Mohmmed BS, Alalwani NN, Sobhy MM, Qadi KA, Khawaji SA, Mhbob HO, Alsadi FM, Moaleem MM. Analysis of the Facial Measurements and Dental Arch Dimensions for the Construction of Dental Prostheses among Adult Yemenis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (8):595-604.
Aim: To investigate the dental arch dimension (width, length, and height) and facial measurements including inner-canthal width (ICW), bizygomatic width (BZW), inter-alar width (IAW), and mouth width (MW), and to assess the correlation between these facial measurements and dental arch width (canine width [CW], inter-first premolar width [I1PW], and inter-first molar width [I1MW]), to establish a preliminary reference for artificial teeth selection in Yemeni adult.
Materials and methods: The study included 80 individuals (40 males and 40 females) with symmetrical faces and normal class I occlusion ranging in age from 20 to 35. Maxillary and mandibular stone casts were made for each individual. The dimensions of dental casts and facial measurements, including ICW, BZW, IAW, and MW, were assessed using a digital caliper. The collected data were analyzed by using the SPSS software program. The descriptive statistics for each measurement were made. Differences between males and females were tested using an independent-sample t-test with p-values below 0.05 considered significant. Pearson correlation coefficient between facial measurements and dental arch width was also done.
Results: Most dental arch dimensions and facial measurements exhibited larger mean values in the male than in the female group, with the greatest significant difference in the maxillary dental arch width and the lowest in mandibular dental arch length. A highly significant correlation is observed between ICW and maxillary canine width (CW) (r = 0.318, p = 0.004). In contrast, no significant correlation between dental arch width and BZW, IAW, and MW is shown.
Conclusions: Within this study's limitations, the ICW can determine the ideal dimension of the artificial teeth in the anterior maxillary arch. While the other facial parameters, including BZW, IAW, and MW, cannot be used for artificial teeth selection in Yemeni populations.
Clinical significance: The findings of this study established a reference database of facial measurements and their correlation to dental arch and teeth width in Yemeni populations. So, it can be implemented in artificial teeth and dental prostheses design and construction.
Prasad K, Hegde C, Kumar A. Selection and arrangement of teeth for esthetic complete denture prosthesis-an art and science. Guident 2013;6(2):15–22.
Park SJ, Leesungbok R, Song JW, et al. Analysis of dimensions and shapes of maxillary and mandibular dental arch in Korean young adults. J Adv Prosthodont 2017; 9(5):321–327. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.321.
Smith SS, Buschang PH, Watanabe E. Interarch tooth size relationships of 3 populations: “Does Bolton's analysis apply?” Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117(2):169–174. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70228-9.
Ahmed ZM. Clinical measurements of the dimensions of the dental arches and its application on construction of dental prosthesis. Al–Rafidain Dent J 2006;6(1):88–97. DOI: 10.33899/rden.2006.42394.
Attokaran G, Shenoy K. Correlation between interalar distance and mesiodistal width of maxillary anterior teeth in Thrissur, Kerala, Indian population. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2018;8(2):118–123. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_47_18.
Hoffman W Jr, Bomberg TJ, Hatch RA. Interalar width as a guide in denture tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55(2):219–221. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90348-3.
Hayward DE. Use of natural upper anterior teeth in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1968;19(4):359–363. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(68)90038-3.
Suzuki A, Suzuki T, Hayakawa I. Boucher's Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients, 1997. Prosthodontic research practice, 5(1):44–51, 5th edition 2006.
Ahmad N, Ahmed M, Jafri Z. Esthetics considerations in the selection of teeth for complete denture patients: A review. Ann Dent Specialty 2013;1(1):4–7.
Oda S, Arai K, Nakahara R. Commercially available archwire forms compared with normal dental arch forms in a Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(4):520–527. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.025.
Wang Y, Song Y, Zhong Q, et al. Evaluation of influence factors on the width, length, and width to length ratio of the maxillary central incisor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33(2):351–363. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12606.
Townsend GC, Brown T. Heritability of permanent tooth size. Am J Phys Anthropol 1978;49(4):497–504. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330490409.
Flavie AME, Pierrot KN, Omer N, et al. Correlation between the bizygomatic distance and the width of the upper central incisor in the Cameroonian melanoderma adult. Open J Stomatol 2022;12:294–304. DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2022.1210026.
Patel J, Sethuraman R, Shah MH. A comparative evaluation of the relationship of inner-canthal distance and inter-alar width to the intercanine width amongst the Gujarati population. J Adva Oral Res 2011;2(3):31–38. DOI: 10.1177/2229411220110306.
Jain AR, Nallaswamy D, Ariga P, et al. Determination of correlation of width of maxillary anterior teeth using extraoral and intraoral factors in Indian population: A systematic review. World J Dent 2018;9(1):68–75. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1509.
Gupta R, Luthra RP, Sharma. A comparative evaluation of the inter-relationship between inner-canthal distance, inter-alar width and inter-pupillary distance with respect to intercanine width amongst the population of Himachal Pradesh. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res 2016;4(6):186–192. DOI: 10.21276/jamdsr.2016.4.6.45.
Kumar KVA, Gupta SH, Sandhu HS. Determination of mesiodistal width of maxillary anterior teeth using inner canthal distance. Med J Armed Forces India 2015;71(Suppl. 2):S376–S381. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.08.002.
AL-Kaisy N, Garib BT. Selecting maxillary anterior tooth width by measuring certain facial dimensions in the Kurdish population. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115(3):329–334. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.012.
Al-Sarraf HA. Maxillary and mandibular dental arch dimensions in children aged 12–15 years with class I normal occlusion. Cross-sectional study. Master Thesis, College of Dentistry, Mosul University, 1996.
Alkadhi OH, Almahfouz SF, Tokhtah HA, et al. Dental arch dimensions in Saudi Adults. Int J Dent 2018;2190250. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2190250.
Ling JY, Wong RW. Dental arch widths of Southern Chinese. Angle Orthod 2009;79(1):54–63. DOI: 10.2319/092007-452.1.
Al-Wosabi JO, Hafez SAH, Abd-Elsayed FA. “Dental arch analysis for a group of Yemeni adults.” Egypt Dent J 2003;49:531–547.
Prasad M, Kannampallil ST, Talapaneni AK, et al. Evaluation of arch width variations among different skeletal patterns in South Indian population. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2013;4(1):94–102. DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.107267.
Al-Zubair NM. Determinant factors of Yemeni maxillary arch dimensions. Saudi Dent J 2015;27(1):50–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.08.005.
Ardani IA, Wicaksono A, Kromsian OF, et al. The comparison of maxillary and mandibular dental arch size in male and female Papuan in Surabaya: A cross-sectional study. J Int Oral Health 2021;13:24–28. DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_69_20.
Sinavarat P, Anunmana C, Hossain S. The relationship of maxillary canines to the facial anatomical landmarks in a group of Thai people. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5(4):369–373. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.4.369.
Kassab NH. The selection of maxillary anterior teeth width in relation to facial measurements at different types of face form. Al-Rafidain Dent J 2005;5(1):15–23. DOI: 10.33899/rden.2004.45506.
Hamid MMM, Faragalla AI, Ibrahim WSA, et al. Facial Anthropometry among Saudi Population. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2021;11:1398–1402.
Deogade SC, Mantri SS, Sumathi K, et al. The relationship between innercanthal dimension and interalar width to the intercanine width of maxillary anterior teeth in central Indian population. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015;15(2):91–97. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.155028.
Aziz NIA, Mohd NC, Baharuddin IH, et al. The relationship of facial measurements with the mesiodistal width of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Dent Indones 2021;28(3):158–162. DOI: 10.14693/jdi.v28i3.1270.
Arslan SG, Gen C, Odaba B, et al. Comparison of facial proportions and anthropometric norms among Turkish young adults with different face types. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2008;32(2):234–242. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-007-9049-y.
Shammas M, Bukhari EO, Rummani AJ, et al. Evaluation of relation between bizygomatic width and mesiodistal dimension of maxillary central incisor in Saudi population: An in vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res 2020;14(10). DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2020/45687.14159.
Rawat A, Godbole S, Sathe S, et al. Evaluation of relation between bizygomatic width and mesiodistal dimension of maxillary central incisor in Indian population: An in vivo study. Int J Sci Stud 2015;3(6):38–42. DOI: 10.17354/ijss/2015/388.
Kumar GS. Orban's Oral Histology and Embryology, 14th edition. India: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2015.
Chaudhary MAG, Khan A, Qureshi A, et al. Relationship between intercanthal distance to inter canine width of maxillary anterior teeth in Pakistani population. J Pak Dent Assoc 2018;27(03):124–26. DOI: 10.25301/JPDA.273.124.
Baleegh S, Choudhry Z, Malik S, et al. The relationship between widths of upper anterior teeth and facial widths. Pak Oral Dent J 2015; 35(4); 742–745. DOI: 10.14693/jdi.v28i3.1270.
Latta GH Jr, Weaver J, Conkin J. The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthetic Dent 199;65(2):250–254. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90170-2.