Prevalence and Etiology of Maxillary Midline Diastema among University Students, Hodeidah Governorate, Yemen: A Cross-sectional Study
Hani SA A Al-Zazai, Khaled Al-Haddad, Ghamdan Al-Harazi, Mohammed G Al-Sharabi, Ali MA Rasheed, Khalil IH Rajhi, Mohammed J Basihi, Mohammed M Al Moaleem
Keywords :
Age, Etiology of diastema, Gender, Maxillary midline diastema, Prevalence, Width of diastema
Citation Information :
Al-Zazai HS, Al-Haddad K, Al-Harazi G, Al-Sharabi MG, Rasheed AM, Rajhi KI, Basihi MJ, Moaleem MM. Prevalence and Etiology of Maxillary Midline Diastema among University Students, Hodeidah Governorate, Yemen: A Cross-sectional Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024; 25 (10):968-975.
Aim: This study assessed the prevalence and etiological factors of maxillary midline diastema (MMD) in students attending different colleges and universities in Al-Hodeidah governorate, Yemen.
Participants and methods: A total of 1,661 participants from different universities in Al-Hodeidah governorate were assessed, analyzed, and screened for the presence or absence of MMD. Only 246 had positive MMD and were divided five age-groups. Maxillary midline diastema width was assessed, and three groups were established: groups I (0.5–1 mm), II (1.1–2 mm), and III (over 2 mm). Associations of MMD with gender, family history, and etiology of MMD were documented. The data were recorded and statistically analyzed.
Results: Out of the total students from different colleges, 1,107 were males (66.6%). The 19–20-year age-group was the largest (712; 42.9%), and 264 participants had positive MMD (15.9%). A significant difference in MMD was found between genders (p = 0.002), but no significant differences were found among different age-groups (p = 0.511). Highly attached labial frenum attachment was the most frequent cause of MMD. Males were larger in number and had higher percentages for all different causes, and a significant difference was observed between genders in terms of highly attached labial frenum and generalized spacing parameters (p = 0.004, 0.009). The Chi-squared test showed significant differences in family history and presence of MMD between genders (p = 0.016). Large MMD widths were recorded in groups I, II, and III (1.00, 1.5, and 2.1 mm, respectively), which were together 108 (83.1%), 60 (87.0%), and 16 (53.3%), respectively.
Conclusion: The prevalence of MMD can be considered high in the participants and slightly higher in males. Among the causative factors of MMD, a highly attached labial frenum was the most common cause. Group II recorded the highest number of participants with large MMD widths, followed by group I.
Clinical significance: Addressing the prevalence and causes of MMD can result in proper planning to minimize further esthetic appearances and functional complications.
Polder BJ, Van‘t H of MA, Van der Linden FP, et al. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32(3):217–226. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00158.x.
Hasan HS, Al Azzawi AM, Kolemen A. Pattern of distribution and etiologies of Midline diastema among Kurdistan-region Population. J Clin Exp Dent 2020;12(10):e938–e943. DOI: 10.4317/jced.57122.
Gupta R, Jandial S, Mahajan N, et al. The prevalence and etiology of maxillary midline diastema in Jammu population. Int J Prev Public Health Sci 2017;3:41–43.
Attia Y. Midline diastemas: Closure and stability. Angle Orthod 1993;63(3):209–212. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1993)063<0209:MDCAS>2.0.CO;2.
Nuvvula S, Ega S, Mallineni SK, et al. Etiological factors of the midline diastema in children: A systematic review. Int J Gen Med 2021;14:2397–2405. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S297462.
Hussain U, Ayub A, Farhan M. Etiology and treatment of midline diastema: A review of literature. Pak Orthod J 2013;5(1):27–33. Available from: https://poj.org.pk/index.php/poj/article/view/76.
Al Enezi S, Zaatar E, Salako NO. Prevalence of selected dental anomalies in Kuwaiti orthodontic patients. Orthodont J 2002;9:23–31.
AlHudaithi FS, AlDuhayan NA, AlJohani LN, et al. Prevalence of dental anomalies among orthodontic patients: A retrospective study in Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2023;15(12):e49893. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49893.
Celikoglu M, Akpinar S, Yavuz I. The pattern of malocclusion in a sample of orthodontic patients from Turkey. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15(5):e791–e796. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.15.e791.
Athumani AP, Mugonzibwa E. Perception on diastema medialle (Mwanya) among dental patients attending Muhimbili National Hospital. Tenz Dent J 2006;12:50–75. DOI: 10.4314/tdj.v12i2.37547.
Nainar SM, Gnanasundaram N. Incidence and etiology of midline diastema in a population in South India (Madras). Angle Orthod 1989;59(4):277–282. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1989)059<0277: IAEOMD>2.0.CO;2.
Moyers R. Handbook of Orthodontics, 4th edition. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1988. pp. 348–360.
Luqman M, Sadatullah S, Saleem MY, et al. The prevalence and etiology of maxillary midline diastema in a Saudi population in Aseer region of Saudi Arabia. Int J Clin Dent Sci 2011;2:81–85. DOI: 10.17656/sdj.10026.
Al-Zubair NM, Almulla U. Malocclusion traits of Yemeni female school children. Orthodont J Nepal 2014;4(1):41–44. DOI: 10.3126/ojn.v4i1.11310.
Abdulateef DS, Alib AG, Othman NF. The prevalence and etiology of maxillary midline diastema among orthodontic patients attending Shorsh Dental Clinic in Sulaimani City. Sulaimani Dent J 2014;1:86–90. DOI: 10.17656/sdj.10026.
Hamad NH. Incidence of maxillary midline diastema in Iraqi students in Baghdad City. AJPS 2015;15(1):30–34. DOI: 10.32947/ajps.v15i1.162.
Rashida A, Khalifa A. Maxillary midline diastema among a group of Egyptian adult populations (prevalence and etiology). Tanta Dental J 2021;18:135–139. DOI: 10.4103/tdj.tdj_34_20.
Elfadel II, Abuaffan AH. Prevalence and etiology of midline diastema among Sudanese University students. Indian J Dent Educ 2016;9(1):15–20. DOI: 10.21088/ijde.0974.6099.9116.3.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310(20):2191–2194. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
Al-Arwali SAM, Al-Haddad K, Zabara A-QM, et al. Knowledge, awareness, and use of stainless-steel crowns among dental professionals in Sana'a City, Yemen. Med Sci Monit 2024;30:1–13. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945948.
Divater V, Bali P, Nawab A, et al. Frenal attachment and its association with oral hygiene status among adolescents in Dakshina Kannada population: A cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8(11):3664–3667. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_611_19.
Priyanka M, Sruthi R, Ramakrishnan T, et al. An overview of frenal attachments. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17(1):12–15. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.107467.
Sobral MC. Solutions for atypical problems in the incisors area: A transdisciplinary challenge. Dental Press J Orthod 2020;25(2):86–102. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.2.086-102.sar.
Hua F, He H, Ngan P, et al. Prevalence of peg-shaped maxillary permanent lateral incisors: A meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144(1):97–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.025.
Abraham R, Kamath G. Midline diastema and its aetiology: A review. Dent Update 2014;41(5):457–460, 4624. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2014.41.5.457.
Ahiaku S, Millar BJ. Maxillary midline diastemas in West African Smiles. Int Dent J 2023;73(2):167–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.06.020.
Al-Rubayee M. Median Diastema in a college students’ sample in the Baghdad city. Med J Babylon 2013;10:400–406.
Brunelle JA, Bhat M, Lipton JA. Prevalence and distribution of selected occlusal characteristics in the US population, 1988–1991. J Dent Res 1996;75 Spec No:706–713. DOI: 10.1177/002203459607502S10.
Shakoor U, Azeem M, Ali S, et al. Frequency of maxillary midline diastema in Pakistani population. PJMHS 2010;14(3):654–656.
Madi M, Alamri A, Aleisa D, et al. Associations between maxillary labial frenum morphology, attachment, and patient-related clinical factors in Saudi Arabian Adults: Cross-sectional study. Saudi Dent J 2024;36(4):615–620. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.02.002.
Ahmed Z, Awaisi ZH, Ahmed Z. Etiology of midline diastema in patients presenting to Nishtar Institute of Dentistry, Multan. Khyber Med Univ J 2022;14(3):169–172. DOI: 10.35845/kmuj.2022.21987.
Nemec M, Schwarz L, Bertl MH, et al. Maxillary lateral incisor agenesis is associated with maxillary form: A geometric morphometric analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2023;27(3):1063–1070. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04690-9.
Swarnalatha C, Paruchuri U, Babu JS, et al. Prevalence of congenitally missing upper lateral incisors in an orthodontic adolescent population. J Orthod Sci 2020;9:15. DOI: 10.4103/jos.JOS_28_19.
Ranjbaran MA, Aslani F, Jafari-Naeimi A, et al. Associations among the occurrence or types of maxillary canine impaction, labial frenum attachment types, lateral incisor anomalies, and midline diastema in patients with and without impaction: A case-control study. Int Orthod 2023;21(2):100743. DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100743.
Konstantinova DA, Nedelchev DK, Nenova-Nogalcheva AK. Retrospective epidemiological study of the width of maxillary diastema in patients from northeastern Bulgaria. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2024;66(4):500–504. DOI: 10.3897/folmed.66.e128602.
Adigun A, Yemitan T, Uti O. Relationship between maxillary midline diastema width and labial frenum attachment in a sample of Nigerian adolescents: A cross-sectional study. Niger J Med 2022;31:274–279. DOI: 10.4103/NJM.NJM_28_22.