The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 25 , ISSUE 12 ( December, 2024 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Scientometric Mapping of the Flipped Classroom in Dental Education: Geospatial Dynamics, Emergent Patterns, and Networking

Fran Espinoza-Carhuancho, Alexander Taquia-Faustino, Lucia Quispe-Tasayco, Arnaldo Munive-Degregori, Katia Medina-Calderon, Frank Mayta-Tovalino

Keywords : Dental education, Dental training, Flipped classroom, Scientometrics

Citation Information : Espinoza-Carhuancho F, Taquia-Faustino A, Quispe-Tasayco L, Munive-Degregori A, Medina-Calderon K, Mayta-Tovalino F. Scientometric Mapping of the Flipped Classroom in Dental Education: Geospatial Dynamics, Emergent Patterns, and Networking. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024; 25 (12):1172-1178.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3800

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 05-03-2025

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To perform a scientometric mapping of the flipped classroom (FC) in dental education through an analysis of geospatial dynamics, emerging patterns, and collaborative networks. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search of the Web of Science database (Core Collection) was conducted on September 1, 2024, using specific terms related to innovative teaching methodologies and dental education. Articles published between January 2005 and September 2024, indexed in Web of Science, and published in English were included. The collected data included article title, authors, year of publication, journal, keywords, and number of citations. Data analysis was conducted using CiteSpace and Bibliometrix to identify publication patterns, emerging trends, and collaborative networks. Results: Between 2005 and 2024, 306 documents from 94 sources were analyzed, with an annual growth rate of 20.2%. The average age of the documents was 6.19 years, with an average of 12.47 citations per document and 7,469 references. In total, 701 authors’ keywords were identified. A total of 1,183 authors participated, of whom 19 published single-authored papers, resulting in 20 single-authored papers. The average number of coauthors per paper was 4.39, with 18.63% international coauthorships. The main clusters identified were “Flipped Classroom”, “COVID-19”, and “Curriculum Reform”. The years 2019 and 2020 contained the highest number of co-citations, highlighting authors such as Gianoni-Capenakas and Iyer. The three-dimensional structure of the landscape view graph revealed densely connected areas, indicating consolidated research themes. Conclusion: The results of this study have demonstrated a significant evolution in educational methodologies in dentistry, with an increasing focus on the FC and other educational technologies. The high concentration of publications in key journals and the predominance of authors with a single publication underline the importance of fostering collaborative networks and the dissemination of innovative practices. These findings require alignment with the conclusion mentioned in the main manuscript, as the overall conclusion is very broad and needs to be more specific to reflect the detailed results of the study. Clinical significance: This study mapping the FC in dental education is clinically significant because it has a chance to influence the very nature of teaching methodologies. The study treats geospatial dynamics, emerging patterns, and collaborative networks and has highlighted the further incursion of innovative educational practices. The findings show that continued research and collaboration are needed to further optimize and develop these methodologies for the benefit of both educators and learners in the field of dentistry.


PDF Share
  1. Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ 2018;18(1):38. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z.
  2. Wang Z, Kohno EY, Fueki K, et al. Multilevel factor analysis of flipped classroom in dental education: A 3-year randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2021;16(9): e0257208. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257208.
  3. Gali S, Shetty V, Murthy NS, et al. Bridging the gap in 1(st) year dental material curriculum: A 3 year randomized cross over trial. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015;15:244–249. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.161565.
  4. Kishimoto N, Nguyen BH, Tran SD, et al. Telesimulation training applying flipped classroom in the dental clinic for medical emergencies. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2021;21(2):179–181. DOI: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.2.179.
  5. Lu F, Luo Z, Huang T, et al. Effectiveness evaluation of flipped classroom in emergency medicine online teaching for medical undergraduates. Med Teach 2024;46(5):689–696. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2273780.
  6. Yu CH. Hybrid teaching mode including physical, online, and flipped classroom learning for dental education in Taiwan. J Dent Sci 2022;17(1):624–625. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.09.026.
  7. Prabhavathi K, KalyaniPraba P, Rohini P, et al. Flipped classroom as an effective educational tool in teaching physiology for first-year undergraduate medical students. J Educ Health Promot 2024;13:283. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1854_23.
  8. Sivarajan S, Soh EX, Zakaria NN, et al. The effect of live demonstration and flipped classroom with continuous formative assessment on dental students’ orthodontic wire-bending performance. BMC Med Educ 2021;21(1):326. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02717-5.
  9. Lau MN, Kamarudin Y, Zakaria NN, et al. Comparing flipped classroom and conventional live demonstration for teaching orthodontic wire-bending skill. PLoS One 2021;16(7):e0254478. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254478.
  10. Kohli S, Sukumar AK, Zhen CT, et al. Dental education: Lecture versus flipped and spaced learning. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2019;16(5):289–297. PMID: 31543934.
  11. Zhou Y, Zhang D, Guan X, et al. Application of WeChat-based flipped classroom on root canal filling teaching in a preclinical endodontic course. BMC Med Educ 2022;22(1):138. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03189-x.
  12. Bizhang M, Zimmer S, Ehlers JP. Quantitative analysis of the acceptance and learning success instead of flipped classroom teaching in a caries diagnosis course for undergraduate students. Int J Dent 2022;2022:7749638. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7749638.
  13. Kushairi N, Ahmi A. Flipped classroom in the second decade of the Millenia: A bibliometrics analysis with Lotka's law. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) 2021;26(4):4401–4431. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10 457-8.
  14. He Z, Zhou B, Feng H, et al. Inverted classroom teaching of physiology in basic medical education: Bibliometric visual analysis. JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e52224. DOI: 10.2196/52224.
  15. Ozyurt O. Empirical research of emerging trends and patterns across the flipped classroom studies using topic modeling. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) 2023;28(4):4335–4362. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022- 11396-8.
  16. Cheng L, Ritzhaupt AD, Antonenko P. Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strat egy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educ Technol Res Dev 2019;67(4),793–824. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7.
  17. Meral E, Teke D, Güler M, et al. General trends of studies on flipped classroom model: Bibliometric mapping and content analysis. Int Online J Educ Teach 2020;8(2):564–587. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1294343.
  18. Mayta-Tovalino F, Diaz-Barrera ME, Runzer-Colmenares FM, et al. RAMIBS: Reporting and measurement of items for bibliometric or scientometric studies in health sciences. J Int Oral Health 2024;16:253–256. DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_23_24.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.