The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 4 ( November, 2002 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Digital Radiography: An Overview

Edwin T. Parks, Gail F. Williamson

Citation Information : Parks ET, Williamson GF. Digital Radiography: An Overview. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002; 3 (4):23-39.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-3-4-23

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-11-2002

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2002; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Citation

Parks ET, Williamson GF. Digital Radiography: An Overview. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002 November;(3)4:023-039.


PDF Share
  1. al. Presentations and physical evaluation of Radio Visio Graphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989 Aug;68(2):238-42.
  2. Research utilizing dental electronic record. Joint symposium IADR, AADR and ADEA. San Diego, CA. March 6, 2002.
  3. Specialized radiographic techniques. In:Pharoah MJ, White SC, editors. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. 4th Edition. St. Louis, Mosby, 2000. p. 223-4.
  4. An overview of oral and maxillofacial imaging. In:Razmus TF, Williamson GF. Current Oral and Maxillofacial Imaging. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1996. p 6-7.
  5. Imaging using solid-state detectors. In: Miles DA, Van Dis ML, editors. Advances in Dental Imaging. Dent Clin North Am. 1993 Oct;37(4):531-40. Review.
  6. Compliance of Michigan dentists with radiographic safety recommendations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992 Apr;73(4):510-3.
  7. Radiologic science for technologists: Physics, biology, and protection. 7th Edition. St. Louis, CV Mosby, 2001:374
  8. Principles of Digital Imaging. In: Miles DA, editor. Applications of Digital Imaging Modalities for Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):237-48, v.
  9. Image receptors and producing diagnostic quality images. In:Razmus TF, Williamson GF. Current Oral and Maxillofacial Imaging. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1996. p 60-5.
  10. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. 4th Edition. St. Louis, Mosby, 2000. p. 75
  11. Intraoral Detectors. In:Miles DA, editor. Applications of Digital Imaging Modalities for Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):249-55, v.
  12. al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Mar;89(3):356-62.
  13. Active pixel sensors: Are CCDs dinosaurs? International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) 1993;1900:2-14.
  14. al. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Jul;92(1):93-7.
  15. al. An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998 Mar;27(2):97-101.
  16. al. Pre-clinical performance comparing film and CCDbased systems. J Dent Hyg. 2002 Winter;76(1):26-33.
  17. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001 Jul;30(4):203-8.
  18. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002 Mar;31(2):93-9.
  19. Digital radiography and caries diagonsis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998 Jan;27(1):3-11. Review.
  20. al A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jan;85(1):113-8.
  21. Digital Imaging for Dental Caries. In:Miles D, editor. Applications of Dental Imaging Modalities in Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):319-38, vi. Review.
  22. al. Periodontitis detection efficacy of film and digital images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 May;85(5):608-12.
  23. al. Reliability of assessing interproximal bone loss by digital radiography: intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Sep;28(9):869-78.
  24. Image plate systems differ in physical performance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Jan;89(1):118-24.
  25. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography. Swed Dent J-Supplement. 2000;139:i-viii:1-67.
  26. Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):273-97, vi. Review.
  27. al. Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral head films. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61(2):91-9.
  28. al. Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: Comparison with conventional radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Jul;82(1):94-100.
  29. al. Endodontic working length assessment: Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Mar;85(3):325-8.
  30. al. Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Jun;83(6):725-31.
  31. Extraoral and Panoramic Systems. In:Miles D, editor. Applications of Dental Imaging Modalities in Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):257-72, v-vi. Review.
  32. Quantitative dental radiography with a new photostimulable phosphor system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Apr;89(4):498-508.
  33. 06, July 6, 2001. http://medical.nema.org/dicom/geninfo/dicomstrategyv105/StrategyJuly0601.htm
  34. Integration of the digital imaging and communications in medicine standard into an oral and Maxillofacial image management and communication system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Feb;91(2):235-8.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.