The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( February, 2004 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Influence of Passive Ultrasonic Activation on the Penetration Depth of Different Sealers

A. Cemal Tinaz, L. Sibel karadağ, Tansev Mıhçioğlu

Citation Information : Tinaz AC, Sibel karadağ L, Mıhçioğlu T. Influence of Passive Ultrasonic Activation on the Penetration Depth of Different Sealers. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004; 5 (1):115-125.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-5-1-115

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-02-2006

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2004; The Author(s).


Abstract

Citation

Karadağ LS, Mıhçıoğlu T, Tınaz AC. Influence of Passive Ultrasonic Activation on the Penetration Depth of Different Sealers. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004 February;(5)1:115-125.


PDF Share
  1. al. Ultrasonic versus hand filing of dentin: a quantitative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980;49(1):79-81.
  2. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: an insight into the mechanisms involved. J Endod. 1987 Mar;13(3):93-101. No abstract available.
  3. Disorganisation and disruption mammalian and ameboid cells by acoustic streaming. J Acoust Soc Am 1972;52:688-93.
  4. A scanning electron microscope evaluation of root canal debridement with the endosonic ultrasonic synergistic system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982 May;53(5):527-31. No abstract available.
  5. al. An in vitro comparison study to quantitate the debridement ability of hand, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation. J Endod. 1987 Sep;13(9):434-40. No abstract available.
  6. al. An in vitro histological comparison of the step-back, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation techniques in small, curved root canals. J Endod. 1987 Jul;13(7):307-14. No abstract available.
  7. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals. J Endod. 1989 Feb;15(2):49-59.
  8. al. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod. 1999 Nov;25(11):735-8.
  9. Effects of constraint on the oscillatory pattern of endosonic files. J Endod. 1989 May;15(5):189-94.
  10. al. Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation. Int Endod J. 2002 May;35(5):418-21.
  11. The penetration of smear material into dentinal tubules during instrumentation with surface-active reagents: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 1989 Dec;15(12):588-90.
  12. Effects of rotary instruments and ultrasonic irrigation on debris and smear layer scores: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J. 2002 Jul;35(7):582-9.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.