The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 2 ( May, 2004 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Examiner Agreement in the Replacement Decision of Class I Amalgam Restorations

R. Banu Ermiş, Ulkem Aydin

Citation Information : Ermiş RB, Aydin U. Examiner Agreement in the Replacement Decision of Class I Amalgam Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004; 5 (2):81-92.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-5-2-81

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-05-2004

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2004; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Citation

Ermiş RB, Aydin U. Examiner Agreement in the Replacement Decision of Class I Amalgam Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004 May;(5)2:081-092.


PDF Share
  1. Underestimation of the prevalence of approximal caries and inadequate restorations in a clinical epidemiological study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;27(5):331-7.
  2. Class II amalgams: interobserver variations in replacement decisions and diagnosis of caries and crevices. Int Dent J. 1992 Feb;42(1):12-8.
  3. The effect of a training program on the reliability of examiners evaluating amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 1997 Mar-Apr;22(2):57-65.
  4. Restorative decision-making behavior with magnification. Quintessence Int. 1992 Oct;23(10):667-71.
  5. Cumulative assessment of factors leading to restorative decisions in an educational environment. A graphical demonstration using an in vitro case. Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):336-43.
  6. Iÿki yönlü amalgam restorasyonlarin radyografik değerlendirmesinde gözlemci içi ve gözlemciler arasi uyum. Ege Üniv Dis, hek Fak Derg 2003;24:29-33.
  7. al. Examiner agreement between hygienists and dentists for caries prevalence examinations. J Public Health Dent. 1990 Winter;50(1):32-7.
  8. al. The effect of experience and training on the diagnosis of approximal coronal caries from bitewing radiographs. A Swiss-American comparison. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1994;104(6):719-23.
  9. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations. Quintessence Int. 1999 Jun;30(6):413-8.
  10. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.
  11. al. Classification systems in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002;10:290-297.
  12. Understanding dentists’ restorative treatment decisions. J Public Health Dent. 1992 Winter;52(2):102-10. Review.
  13. The effect of a training program on the reliability of examiners evaluating amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 1997 Mar-Apr;22(2):57-65.
  14. Evaluation of a calibration trial to increase interexaminer reliability of radiographic diagnosis of approximal carious lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1980 Jun;8(3):135-8.
  15. Buonocore memorial lecture. Clinical assessments of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 1986 Spring;11(2):55-62. No abstract available.
  16. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int. 1997 Apr;28(4):245-8.
  17. A comparison of senior dental students and normative standards with regard to caries assessment and treatment decisions to restore occlusal surfaces of permanent teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 May;79(5):596-603.
  18. al. Clinical and radiographic judgement of occlusal caries in adolescents. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000 Apr;108(2):93-8.
  19. al. Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically, by conventional film radiographs, and by digitized, processed radiographs. Caries Res. 1990;24(5):327-33.
  20. A comparison of radiographic occlusal and approximal caries diagnoses made by 240 dentists. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001 Oct;59(5):285-9.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.