The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 4 ( November, 2004 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Advantage of Intraoral D and E Film for Detecting Interproximal Caries

Abdolrahim Davari, Fatemeh Ezoddini Ardakani, Daryoush Goodarzipour, Koorosh Goodarzipour

Citation Information : Davari A, Ardakani FE, Goodarzipour D, Goodarzipour K. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Advantage of Intraoral D and E Film for Detecting Interproximal Caries. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004; 5 (4):58-70.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-5-4-58

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-07-2006

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2004; The Author(s).


Abstract

Citation

Ardakani FE, Davari A, Goodarizpour D, et. al. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Advantage of Intraoral D and E Film for Detecting Interproximal Caries. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004 November;(5)4:058-070.

PDF Share
  1. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. Fourth edition, 2000, Mosby, Missouri, USA.
  2. Art and Science of Operative Dentistry, 4 th ed. 2002, Mosby, Missouri, USA.
  3. [Ther diagnosis of approximal caries╌a comparison of clinical, fiber optic and x-ray diagnostic procedures (the diagnosis of approximal caries)] Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl. 1991;79(7):535-42. German.
  4. Radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of caries progression and observer performance. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1979(3):1-32.
  5. al. In vitro study into the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the detection of artificial caries defects on bitewing radiographs. Caries Res. 1989;23(5):334-41.
  6. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 Jan;28(1):26-30.
  7. al. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Sep;29(5):312-8.
  8. [A comparative study of analog and digital intraoral x-ray image detector systems] Rofo. 2000 Jun;172(6):534-41. German.
  9. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Jan;29(1):41-5.
  10. Comparison of interproximal carious lesion detection in panoramic and standard intraoral radiography. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976 Dec;93(6):1154-8.
  11. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Caries Res. 1994;28(5):363-7.
  12. A comparison of Ultraspeed and Ektaspeed dental x-ray film: in vitro study of the radiographic appearance of interproximal lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987 Mar;63(3):381-5.
  13. Comparison of Kodak D-speed and E-speed x-ray film in detection of proximal caries. ASDC J Dent Child. 1988 Nov-Dec;55(6):459-62.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.