The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2 ( May, 2005 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: Part II. Histologic Healing and Clinical Root Coverage

Lawrence G. Breault, Lemuel L. Covington, Barry G. Bishop, Constance L. Sedon

Citation Information : Breault LG, Covington LL, Bishop BG, Sedon CL. The Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: Part II. Histologic Healing and Clinical Root Coverage. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6 (2):139-150.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-6-2-139

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-05-2005

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2005; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Citation

Sedon CL, Breault LG, Covington LL, Bishop BG. The Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: Part II. Histologic Healing and Clinical Root Coverage. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 May;(6)2:139-150.


PDF Share
  1. A possible influence of gingival dimensions on attachment loss and gingival recession following placement of artificial crowns. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Oct;23(5):439-45.
  2. Gingival recession in relation to history of hard toothbrush use. J Periodontol 1993;(64):900-5.
  3. Prevalence and etiology of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1967;38:316-22.
  4. The width of keratinized gingival during orthodontic treatment. Its significance and impact on periodontal status. J Periodontol 1981;52:307-313.
  5. Gingival recession in the lower incisor region of 15-year old subjects. J Periodontol 1980;51(2):74-6.
  6. A clinical study of the relationship between crowding of teeth, plaque and gingival condition. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:214-222.
  7. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Feb;134(2):220-5.
  8. The Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: Part I. Patient Selection and Surgical Techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 February;(6)1:146-162.
  9. Human histologic evaluation of root coverage obtained with a connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft. A case report. J Periodontol. 1999 Jul;70(7):813-21.
  10. Successful root coverage: a human histologic evaluation of a case. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Oct;19(5):439-47.
  11. Histology of a human biopsy section following the placement of a subepithelial connective tissue graft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Jun;20(3):225-31.
  12. Clinical and histologic evaluation of human gingival recession treated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain): a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Jun;20(3):269-75.
  13. Human histology of new attachment after root coverage using subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jul;28(7):657-62.
  14. Histology of connective tissue graft. A case report. J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1607-15.
  15. The subpedicle connective tissue graft. A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surfaces. J Periodontol. 1987 Feb;58(2):95-102.
  16. Histological evaluation of 4 cases of root coverage following a connective tissue graft combined with an enamel matrix derivative preparation. J Periodontol. 2002 Dec;73(12):1534-43.
  17. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: Histological evaluation. J Periodontol. 2003 Aug;74(8):1126-35.
  18. The histology of new attachment utilizing a thick autogenous soft tissue graft in an area of deep recession: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1995 Jun;15(3):248-57.
  19. A clinical and histological study of the attachment of grafted tissue to bone and teeth. J Periodontol. 1969 Jul;40(7):381-7.
  20. The effects of citric acid on attachment of laterally positioned flaps. J Periodontol. 1983 Jan;54(1):9-18.
  21. Acellular dermal graft: a human histologic case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Feb;22(1):21-9.
  22. Guided tissue regeneration using a resorbable membrane in gingival recession-type defects: a histologic case report in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998 Feb;18(1):24-33.
  23. Histologic assessment of new attachment following the treatment of a human buccal recession by means of a guided tissue regeneration procedure. J Periodontol. 1993 May;64(5):387-91.
  24. Histologic evaluation of new attachment utilizing a titanium-reinforced barrier membrane in a mucogingival recession defect. A case report. J Periodontol. 1998 Jul;69(7):834-9.
  25. Histologic evaluation of root coverage obtained with GTR in humans: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Jun;21(3):240-51.
  26. Human histologic evaluation of root coverage obtained with a connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft. A case report. J Periodontol. 1999 Jul;70(7):813-21.
  27. Periodontal Therapy, 3rd ed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co.; 1964:560.
  28. Thick gingival autograft for the coverage of gingival recession: a clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1990;10(3):216-29.
  29. Clinical comparison of the free soft tissue autograft and partial thickness apically positioned flap╌preoperative gingival or mucosal margins. J Periodontol. 1975 Oct;46(10):586-95.
  30. The presence of “creeping attachment” in human gingiva. J Periodontol. 1978 Oct;49(10):513-7.
  31. Creeping attachment: autogenous graft vs dermal matrix allograft. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000 Sep;21(9):725-9; quiz 730.
  32. Creeping attachment associated with the connective tissue with partial-thickness double pedicle graft. J Periodontol. 1997 Sep;68(9):890-9.
  33. Root coverage with connective tissue grafts: an evaluation of short- and long-term results. J Periodontol. 2002 Sep;73(9):1054-9.
  34. A 3-year longitudinal evaluation of subpedicle free connective tissue graft forgingival recession coverage. J Periodontol. 2002 Dec;73(12):1412-8.
  35. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the “envelope” technique. J Periodontol. 1985 Jul;56(7):397-402.
  36. The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft: a predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontol. 1992 May;63(5):477-86.
  37. Thick free gingival and connective tissue autografts for root coverage. J Periodontol. 1993 Apr;64(4):315-22.
  38. Use of the supraperiosteal envelope in soft tissue grafting for root coverage. II. Clinical results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994 Aug;14(4):302-15.
  39. Controlled clinical evaluation of the subpedicle connective tissue graft for the coverage of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 1994 Dec;65(12):1107-12.
  40. Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study of 2 procedures. J Periodontol. 1994 Oct;65(10):929-36.
  41. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol. 1985 Dec;56(12):715-20.
  42. Increased gingival dimensions. A significant factor for successful outcome of root coverage procedures? A 2-year prospective clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Aug;23(8):770-7.
  43. Clinical evaluation of tetracycline HCl conditioning in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study. J Periodontol. 1997 Mar;68(3):262-9.
  44. Gingival dimensions after root coverage with free connective tissue grafts. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 May;25(5):424-30.
  45. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions. J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1470-6.
  46. Root coverage and pocket reduction as combined surgical procedures. J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1572-9.
  47. Coverage of previously carious roots is as predictable a procedure as coverage of intact roots. J Periodontol. 2002 Dec;73(12):1419-26.
  48. Connective tissue grafts combined with either double pedicle grafts or coronally positioned pedicle grafts: results of 266 consecutively treated defects in 200 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Oct;22(5):463-71.
  49. Root coverage in molar recession: report of 50 consecutive cases treated with subepithelial connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 2003 May;74(5):703-8.
  50. Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique. Quintessence Int. 2003 Jan;34(1):7-13.
  51. Root coverage using a free soft tissue autograft following citric acid application. Part III. A successful and predictable procedure in areas of deep-wide recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(2):15-37.
  52. Creeping attachment of free gingival grafts. A five-year follow-up study. J Periodontol. 1980 Dec;51(12):681-5.
  53. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Jan;24(1):51-6.
  54. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Dec;22(6):583-93.
  55. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters. J Periodontol. 2003 Aug;74(8):1110-25.
  56. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2004 Mar;75(3):413-9.
  57. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2004 Apr;75(4):600-7.
  58. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1477-84.
  59. Clinical evaluation of acellular allograft dermis for the treatment of human gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001 Aug;72(8):998-1005.
  60. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 2002 Dec;73(12):1405-11.
  61. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study. J Periodontol. 2002 Nov;73(11):1299-307.
  62. A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft. J Periodontol. 2004 May;75(5):734-43.
  63. A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996 Dec;16(6):538-45.
  64. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects. J Periodontol. 1998 Nov;69(11):1271-7.
  65. A comparison of 2 root coverage techniques: guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. results of a series of consecutive cases. J Periodontol. 1998 Dec;69(12):1426-34.
  66. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects. J Periodontol. 1998 Feb;69(2):138-45.
  67. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession. J Periodontol. 1999 Feb;70(2):123-30.
  68. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1441-7.
  69. Gingival recession treatment: guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2000 Feb;71(2):299-307.
  70. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2001 Sep;72(9):1258-64.
  71. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Apr;21(2):171-81.
  72. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001 Oct;72(10):1301-11.
  73. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study. J Periodontol. 2002 Jan;73(1):53-62.
  74. Comparative clinical study of connective tissue graft and two types of bioabsorbable barriers in the treatment of localized gingival recessions. J Periodontol. 2003 Aug;74(8):1196-205.
  75. Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2002:29(Suppl. 3):178-194.
  76. Surgical therapies for the treatment of gingival recession. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):303-20. Review.
  77. The natural history of periodontal disease in man: Prevalence, severity and extent of GR. J Periodontol 1992;63:489-495.
  78. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal recessions. A 4-year follow-up study. J Periodontol. 1996 Nov;67(11):1216-23.
  79. Long-term stability of the mucogingival complex following guided tissueregeneration in gingival recession defects. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Dec;25(12):1041-6.
  80. GTR for root coverage: a long-term follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Feb;22(1):55-61.
  81. Evidence-based mucogingival therapy. Part 1: A critical review of the literature on root coverage procedures. J Periodontol. 2003 May;74(5):709-40.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.