The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 3 ( August, 2005 ) > List of Articles


Fracture Resistance of Premolar Teeth Restored with Different Filling Techniques

Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França, Luís Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo, Claudia Cia Worschech, José Roberto Lovadino

Citation Information : Martins LR, França FM, Paulillo LA, Worschech CC, Lovadino JR. Fracture Resistance of Premolar Teeth Restored with Different Filling Techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6 (3):62-69.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-6-3-62

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-02-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2005; The Author(s).



França FMG, Worschech CC, Paulillo LAMS, Martins LRM, Lovadino JR. Fracture Resistance of Premolar Teeth Restored with Different Filling Techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 August;(6)3:062-069.

PDF Share
  1. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998;10(1):17-22.
  2. The effect of curing light variations on bulk curing and wall-to-wall quality of two types and various shades of resin composites. Dent Mat 1997;13(6):344-52.
  3. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63(2):146-148.
  4. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63(12):1396-1399.
  5. Effect of polymerization contraction in composite restoration. J Dent 1992;20(3):178-82.
  6. Polymerization shrinkage of composite resin: Comparison with tooth deformation. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71(1):7-12.
  7. The composite resin restoration: a literature review part I: proper cavity preparation and placement techniques. J Dent Child 1993;60(1):48-51.
  8. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress developed versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21(1):17-24.
  9. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composite. Oper Dent 1998;23(6):282-289.
  10. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998;26(8):695-700.
  11. Fracture toughness of posterior composite resin fabricated by incremental layering. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(6):557-60.
  12. Direct polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in class II cavities. Am J Dent 1998;11(4):165-172.
  13. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with class II bonded composite resin. J Dent Res 1986;65(2):149-153.
  14. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root facture of pulpless teeth restored with post and core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(3): 262-269.
  15. Direct posterior composite resin restorations: current concepts for the technique. Pract Period Aesthet Dent 1998;10(7):875-886.
  16. Predisposing and contributing factor for complete and incomplete tooth fractures. Dent Update 1999;26(4):150-152, 156-158.
  17. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43(4):419-422.
  18. Fractures of posterior teeth in adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112(2):215-218.
  19. Effects of designs of class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture. Oper Dent 1983;8(1):6-10.
  20. Effects of composite restorations on cuspal fractures of posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57(4):431-5.
  21. Effect of cavity deep on stresses in a restored tooth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(2):174-83.
  22. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75(3):871-878.
  23. Effects of incremental versus bulk fill technique on resistance to cuspal fracture of teeth restored with posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60(3): 283-287.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.