The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 4 ( September, 2006 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Different Bonding Conditions on the Shear Bond Strength of Two Compomers to Bovine Dentin

Hend Al-Nahedh, Nasrien Ateyah

Citation Information : Al-Nahedh H, Ateyah N. Effect of Different Bonding Conditions on the Shear Bond Strength of Two Compomers to Bovine Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7 (4):9-16.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-7-4-9

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-01-2008

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2006; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

Despite the improvements to compomer materials, the bond strength of these materials remains inferior to .composite/resin bonding. systems and limits their clinical use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of acidic conditioning with phosphoric acid and Prompt L-Pop (PLP) on the shear bond strength of two compomers Dyract AP (DAP) and Composan Glass (CG) to dentin.

Methods and Materials

Sixty extracted bovine teeth were used to test the shear bond strength of two compomers to flat dentin labial surfaces. The dentin specimens were randomly assigned to six groups of ten specimens each: Group 1: DAP and Prime & Bond NT (PBNT); Group 2: DAP/PBNT with a 15 second dentin etch prior to bonding; Group 3: DAP placed with PLP adhesive; Group 4: CG and Compobond NE (CBNE); Group 5: CG/CBNE with a 15 second dentin etch; and Group 6: CG placed with PLP adhesive. The specimens were stored at 37°C with 100% humidity for 24 hours then mounted and sheared using an Instron Universal Testing Machine at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results were recorded in Mega Pascals (MPa). The sheared specimens were examined under a light microscope, and the type of failure (adhesive, cohesive, or mixed) was recorded.

Results

The mean dentin shear bond strength value (MPa) for the groups was: Group 1 (11.6±3.9); Group 2 (13.2±3.3); Group 3 (12.4±2.0); Group 4 (13.0±4.3); Group 5 (19.3±3.7); and Group 6 (13.1±3.0). One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests detected a significantly higher bond strength (P ≤ 0.003) for group 5. For groups 1, 3, 4, and 6, the mode of failure was mostly adhesive. When acid etching of dentin was performed (groups 2 and 5), cohesive fracture within dentin was the predominant mode of failure. Acid etching and the use of PLP significantly reduced the number of adhesive fractures and reduced variability in the shear bond strength results.

Conclusions

Acid etching significantly increased the shear bond strength of CG to dentin but did not affect DAP. The application of PLP resulted in a shear bond strength not statistically different from PBNT or CPNE. CG bond to dentin is improved with acid etching using phosphoric acid. However, PLP provided no significant improvement in the shear bond strength of DAP and CG.

Citation

Al-Nahedh H, Ateyah N. Effect of Different Bonding Conditions on the Shear Bond Strength of Two Compomers to Bovine Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 September;(7)4:009-016.

PDF Share
  1. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28-3:215-235.
  2. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995;26:95-110.
  3. Viscoelastic properties of demineralized human dentin measured in water with an atomic force microscope (AFM) based indentation. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:539-544.
  4. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of Monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;16:265-73.
  5. Micromorphological spectrum of acid conditioned dentin following the application of a water-based adhesive. Dent Mater 1998;14:329-338.
  6. Clinical considerations for optimal dental bonding. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:619-625.
  7. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:39-41.
  8. Identification of a resin-dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: during bonding to vital dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:135-141.
  9. Shear bond strength of a new one-bottle dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 1997;10:184-188.
  10. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992;5:213-215.
  11. Laboratory evaluation of one component enamel/dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1996;9:206-210.
  12. Bond strengths of Dyract AP compomer material to dentin of permanent and primary molars: phosphoric acid versus non-rinse conditioner. J Dent Child 2003;70(2):145-152.
  13. Effect of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM Morphology. Am J Dent 1997;10:141-146.
  14. Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. American Journal of Dentistry 1997;10:219-223.
  15. Marginal integrity and post-operative sensitivity in class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 1998;26:555-562.
  16. An ultrastructural study of the influence of the acidity of self-etching primers and smear layers thicken on the bonding to intact dentin. J Adhesive Dent 2000;2:83-98.
  17. Bond strength of resin reinforced glass ionomer cements after enamel etching. Am J Dent 1993;6:299-301.
  18. Bonding mechanism of three .one-bottle. system to conditioned and unconditioned enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:224-230.
  19. A comparison of the bond strength to enamel and dentin of two compomers: An in vitro study. J Dent Child 1998;65:29-31 Jan-Feb.
  20. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch & rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003;28-5:647-660.
  21. Effect of enamel pretreatments on bond strength of compomer. Dent Mater 2001;17:402-408.
  22. Effect of surface conditioning and restorative material on the shear bond strength and resin-dentin interface of a new one-bottle nanofilled adhesive. Dent Mater 2002;18:535-542.
  23. Bond strength of compomers to dentin using acidic primers. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 235-242.
  24. Effect of bonding variables on the shear bond strength and interfacial morphology of a one-bottle adhesive. Oper Dent 2001;26:277-286.
  25. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:306-335.
  26. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1998;23:244-249.
  27. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent 1994;7:144-148.
  28. Effect of dissolution of collagen on adhesion to dentin. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:302-306.
  29. Quantitative contribution of the collagen network in dentin hybridization. Am J Dent 1996;9:140-144.
  30. Adhesion between collagen depleted dentin and dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1998;11:123-127.
  31. Quantitative contribution of resin infiltration/hybridization to dentin bonding. Am J Dent 1993;6:7-9.
  32. Dentinal bonding agents versus glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:259-567.
  33. No-bottle. vs .multi-bottle. dentin adhesives- a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001;17:373-380.
  34. Bond strengths of non-rinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int. 2000;31:353-558.
  35. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73:1212-1220.
  36. Effect of calcium removal on dentin bond strengths. Quintessence Int. 2001; 32: 142-146.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.