The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 4 ( September, 2006 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Review of Polymerization Shrinkage Stress: Current Techniques for Posterior Direct Resin Restorations

Luca Giachetti, Daniele Scaminaci Russo, Claudia Bambi, Romano Grandini

Citation Information : Giachetti L, Russo DS, Bambi C, Grandini R. A Review of Polymerization Shrinkage Stress: Current Techniques for Posterior Direct Resin Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7 (4):79-88.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-7-4-79

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-09-2006

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2006; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Citation

Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bambi C, Grandini R. A Review of Polymerization Shrinkage Stress: Current Techniques for Posterior Direct Resin Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 September;(7)4:079-088.


PDF Share
  1. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. VI. Forces developing in direct-filling materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc 1967;74(3):439-45.
  2. The polymerization contraction of visible-light activated composite resins. J Dent 1988;16(4):177-81.
  3. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999;15(2):128-37.
  4. Cross-linked polymers. I. Factors influencing the efficiency of cross-linking in copolymers of methyl methacrylate and glycol methacrylates. J Am Chem Soc, 1953;75:3544-50.
  5. Polymerization shrinkage of methacrylate esters. Biomaterials, 1987;8:53-6.
  6. Polymerization contraction and conversion of light-curing bisGMA-based methacrylate resin. Biomaterials, 1993;14:871-5.
  7. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:146-8.
  8. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-8.
  9. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage. In:Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Peter Szulc Publishing Co; 1985:243-62.
  10. Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins: comparison with tooth deformation. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:7-12.
  11. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent 1997;25:331-7.
  12. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-9.
  13. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 1990;16:70-7.
  14. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage. In:Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Peter Szulc Publishing Co; 1985:243-62.
  15. Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-activated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. Dent Mater 1993;9:139-43.
  16. Destructive stress in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 1991;70:880-2.
  17. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymerbased restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-40.
  18. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 2003;20:554-64.
  19. Wall-to-wall polymerization contraction of composite resins versus filler content. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:526-31.
  20. Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:487-94.
  21. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997;76:1405-11.
  22. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:497-503.
  23. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000;16:292-6.
  24. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:121-31.
  25. Contraction stress related to degree of conversion and reaction kinetics. J Dent Res 2002;81:114-8.
  26. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990;69:36-9.
  27. The relationship between testy methodology and elastic behavior of composites. J Dent Res 1987;66:1036-9.
  28. Direct filling resins: dimensional changes resulting from polymerization shrinkage and water sorption. J Am Dent Assoc 1953;46:540-4.
  29. Hardening shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of composite resins. J Dent Res 1982;61:654-8.
  30. Relaxation of polymerization contraction by water swelling. J Dent Res 1988;68:630.
  31. Effect of Scotchbond dependent on cavity cleaning, cavity diameter and cavosurface angle. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:141-7.
  32. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-9.
  33. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55,446-7.
  34. , Stamatiades P, Wikerson M. A characterization of firstgeneration flowable composites. JADA 1998;129:567-77.
  35. Dynamic and static moduli of elasticity of resin-based materials. Dent Mater 2002;18:64-71.
  36. Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:721-8.
  37. Am J Dent 1996;9:100-4.
  38. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993;72:1434-42.
  39. Marginal adaptation of class V restorations using different restorative techniques. J Dent 1991;19:24-32.
  40. Effect of composition and curing type of composite on adaptation to dentin cavity wall. Dent Mater J 1986;5:260-6.
  41. Comparison of polymerization contraction stresses between self- and light-curing composites. J Dent 1999;27:383-9.
  42. Relationship between the velocity of polymerization and adaptation to dentin cavity wall of light-cured composite. Dent Mater J 1987;6:32-7.
  43. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 1993;9:2-5.
  44. The dependence of shrinkage stress reduction on porosity concentration in thin resin layers. J Dent Res 1992;71:1619-22.
  45. Some aspects of vacuum mixing of composite resins and its effect on porosity. Quintessence Int 1979;7:69-74.
  46. The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J 1985;158:410-4.
  47. Pulpal response to glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1978;144:345-50.
  48. Glass ionomer-composite sandwich tecnique. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:55-7.
  49. Posterior composite polymerization shrinkage in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three techniques. Pediatr Dent 1986;8:209-12.
  50. The effect of three filling techniques on marginal leakage around class II composite resin restorations in vitro. Quintessence Int 1989;20:117-21.
  51. Effects of polymerization contraction in composite restorations. J Dent 1992;20:178-82.
  52. Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V light-cured composite restorations. J Dent Res 1996;75:1477-83.
  53. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations. Dent Mater 2004;20:236-43.
  54. In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative materials. Br Dent J 1986;161:405-9.
  55. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986;17:777-84.
  56. In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:495-9.
  57. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater 1993;9:6-10.
  58. The effects of filling techniques and a lowviscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities. J Dent. 2003;31:59-66.
  59. Composite resin restorations on posterior teeth. In:Roulet JF, Degrange M. Adhesion: the silent revolution in dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 2000:253-76.
  60. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991;7:107-13.
  61. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:62-6.
  62. Improved proximal margin adaptation of class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986;17:659-64.
  63. The importance of proximal curing in posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1992;23:605-7.
  64. A visible light activated resin cured through tooth structure. Gen Dent 1988;36:236-7.
  65. Successive cusp build-up: an improved placement technique for posterior direct resin restorations. J Can Dent Assoc 1996;62:501-7.
  66. The axial bevel technique: a new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 2000;31:231-9.
  67. Blending incremental and stratified layering techniques to produce an esthetic posterior composite resin restoration with a predictable prognosis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13:101-13.
  68. The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;6:17-23.
  69. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent 1994;19:26-32.
  70. Factors affecting cure at depths within light-activated resin composites. Am J Dent 1993;6:91-5.
  71. An investigation into the microhardness of a light cured composite when cured through varying thicknesses of porcelain. J Oral Rehab 1990;17:327-34.
  72. Effect of light intensity on polymerization contraction of posterior composite. J Dent Res 1997;76:74.
  73. Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexure strength of light-cured composites. Dent Mater 1996;12:328-32.
  74. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:440-4.
  75. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without “softstart-polymerization”. J Dent 1997;25:321-30.
  76. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998;26:695-700.
  77. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:322-6.
  78. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 1995;23:183-9.
  79. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without “softstart-polymerization”. Oper Dent 2000;25:26-32.
  80. Effect of stepped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:23-32.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.