The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 4 ( September, 2006 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Review of Polymerization Shrinkage Stress: Current Techniques for Posterior Direct Resin Restorations

Luca Giachetti, Daniele Scaminaci Russo, Claudia Bambi, Romano Grandini

Citation Information : Giachetti L, Russo DS, Bambi C, Grandini R. A Review of Polymerization Shrinkage Stress: Current Techniques for Posterior Direct Resin Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7 (4):79-88.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-7-4-79

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-02-2008

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2006; The Author(s).


Abstract

Citation

Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bambi C, Grandini R. A Review of Polymerization Shrinkage Stress: Current Techniques for Posterior Direct Resin Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 September;(7)4:079-088.

PDF Share
  1. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. VI. Forces developing in direct-filling materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc 1967;74(3):439-45.
  2. The polymerization contraction of visible-light activated composite resins. J Dent 1988;16(4):177-81.
  3. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999;15(2):128-37.
  4. Cross-linked polymers. I. Factors influencing the efficiency of cross-linking in copolymers of methyl methacrylate and glycol methacrylates. J Am Chem Soc, 1953;75:3544-50.
  5. Polymerization shrinkage of methacrylate esters. Biomaterials, 1987;8:53-6.
  6. Polymerization contraction and conversion of light-curing bisGMA-based methacrylate resin. Biomaterials, 1993;14:871-5.
  7. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:146-8.
  8. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-8.
  9. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage. In:Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Peter Szulc Publishing Co; 1985:243-62.
  10. Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins: comparison with tooth deformation. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:7-12.
  11. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent 1997;25:331-7.
  12. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-9.
  13. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 1990;16:70-7.
  14. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage. In:Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Peter Szulc Publishing Co; 1985:243-62.
  15. Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-activated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. Dent Mater 1993;9:139-43.
  16. Destructive stress in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 1991;70:880-2.
  17. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymerbased restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-40.
  18. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 2003;20:554-64.
  19. Wall-to-wall polymerization contraction of composite resins versus filler content. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:526-31.
  20. Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:487-94.
  21. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997;76:1405-11.
  22. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:497-503.
  23. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000;16:292-6.
  24. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:121-31.
  25. Contraction stress related to degree of conversion and reaction kinetics. J Dent Res 2002;81:114-8.
  26. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990;69:36-9.
  27. The relationship between testy methodology and elastic behavior of composites. J Dent Res 1987;66:1036-9.
  28. Direct filling resins: dimensional changes resulting from polymerization shrinkage and water sorption. J Am Dent Assoc 1953;46:540-4.
  29. Hardening shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of composite resins. J Dent Res 1982;61:654-8.
  30. Relaxation of polymerization contraction by water swelling. J Dent Res 1988;68:630.
  31. Effect of Scotchbond dependent on cavity cleaning, cavity diameter and cavosurface angle. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:141-7.
  32. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-9.
  33. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55,446-7.
  34. , Stamatiades P, Wikerson M. A characterization of firstgeneration flowable composites. JADA 1998;129:567-77.
  35. Dynamic and static moduli of elasticity of resin-based materials. Dent Mater 2002;18:64-71.
  36. Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:721-8.
  37. Am J Dent 1996;9:100-4.
  38. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993;72:1434-42.
  39. Marginal adaptation of class V restorations using different restorative techniques. J Dent 1991;19:24-32.
  40. Effect of composition and curing type of composite on adaptation to dentin cavity wall. Dent Mater J 1986;5:260-6.
  41. Comparison of polymerization contraction stresses between self- and light-curing composites. J Dent 1999;27:383-9.
  42. Relationship between the velocity of polymerization and adaptation to dentin cavity wall of light-cured composite. Dent Mater J 1987;6:32-7.
  43. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 1993;9:2-5.
  44. The dependence of shrinkage stress reduction on porosity concentration in thin resin layers. J Dent Res 1992;71:1619-22.
  45. Some aspects of vacuum mixing of composite resins and its effect on porosity. Quintessence Int 1979;7:69-74.
  46. The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J 1985;158:410-4.
  47. Pulpal response to glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1978;144:345-50.
  48. Glass ionomer-composite sandwich tecnique. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:55-7.
  49. Posterior composite polymerization shrinkage in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three techniques. Pediatr Dent 1986;8:209-12.
  50. The effect of three filling techniques on marginal leakage around class II composite resin restorations in vitro. Quintessence Int 1989;20:117-21.
  51. Effects of polymerization contraction in composite restorations. J Dent 1992;20:178-82.
  52. Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V light-cured composite restorations. J Dent Res 1996;75:1477-83.
  53. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations. Dent Mater 2004;20:236-43.
  54. In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative materials. Br Dent J 1986;161:405-9.
  55. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986;17:777-84.
  56. In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:495-9.
  57. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater 1993;9:6-10.
  58. The effects of filling techniques and a lowviscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities. J Dent. 2003;31:59-66.
  59. Composite resin restorations on posterior teeth. In:Roulet JF, Degrange M. Adhesion: the silent revolution in dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 2000:253-76.
  60. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991;7:107-13.
  61. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:62-6.
  62. Improved proximal margin adaptation of class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986;17:659-64.
  63. The importance of proximal curing in posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1992;23:605-7.
  64. A visible light activated resin cured through tooth structure. Gen Dent 1988;36:236-7.
  65. Successive cusp build-up: an improved placement technique for posterior direct resin restorations. J Can Dent Assoc 1996;62:501-7.
  66. The axial bevel technique: a new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 2000;31:231-9.
  67. Blending incremental and stratified layering techniques to produce an esthetic posterior composite resin restoration with a predictable prognosis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13:101-13.
  68. The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;6:17-23.
  69. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent 1994;19:26-32.
  70. Factors affecting cure at depths within light-activated resin composites. Am J Dent 1993;6:91-5.
  71. An investigation into the microhardness of a light cured composite when cured through varying thicknesses of porcelain. J Oral Rehab 1990;17:327-34.
  72. Effect of light intensity on polymerization contraction of posterior composite. J Dent Res 1997;76:74.
  73. Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexure strength of light-cured composites. Dent Mater 1996;12:328-32.
  74. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:440-4.
  75. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without “softstart-polymerization”. J Dent 1997;25:321-30.
  76. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998;26:695-700.
  77. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:322-6.
  78. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 1995;23:183-9.
  79. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without “softstart-polymerization”. Oper Dent 2000;25:26-32.
  80. Effect of stepped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:23-32.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.