The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 5 ( November, 2006 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of the Number of Coats of Simplified Adhesive Systems on Microleakage of Dentin-Bordered Composite Restorations

Flavia Bittencourt Pazinatto, Maria Teresa Atta, Tânia Sayuri Harada, Linda Wang

Citation Information : Pazinatto FB, Atta MT, Harada TS, Wang L. Effect of the Number of Coats of Simplified Adhesive Systems on Microleakage of Dentin-Bordered Composite Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7 (5):34-41.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-7-5-34

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-11-2006

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2006; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

This study tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference on microleakage of dentin-bordered composite restorations using single or double coats of adhesive from one-bottle adhesive systems.

Methods and Materials

The enamel surface was removed from freshly extracted bovine teeth, and standardized Class V cavities (3 x 3 x 1.5 mm) were made at the cervical areas of buccal surfaces. Teeth were restored and grouped according to type of adhesive systems [Prime Bond 2.1 (PB2.1), Prime & Bond NT (PBNT), and Single Bond (SB)] and to the number of coats (one or two) to be used. The restorations were polished and immersed in a 0.5% aqueous solution of basic fuchsin for four hours. Teeth were then sectioned and the most infiltrated section of each tooth was selected under magnification, scanned, and quantitatively analyzed using a computer program. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student-Newman-Keuls (α=0.05).

Results

Groups without filler content (PB2.1 and SB) showed no difference in microleakage using single or double coats. However, PBNT (with nanofiller) showed statistically less microleakage when only one coat was applied. The influence of the number of coats of the adhesive systems on dentin margin microleakage was material dependent.

Conclusion

All adhesive systems demonstrated microleakage, however, it could be minimized using two coats of non-filled or one coat of a filled adhesive system.

Citation

Harada TS, Pazinatto FB, Wang L, Atta MT. Effect of the Number of Coats of Simplified Adhesive Systems on Microleakage of Dentin-Bordered Composite Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 November;(7)5:034-041.


PDF Share
  1. Effect of dentine conditioners on the bonding efficacy of one-bottle adhesives. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:28-33.
  2. Bond strengths of nine current dentine adhesive systems to primary and permanent teeth. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:296-303.
  3. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surface with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol 1968;13:61-70.
  4. Dentin bonding as a function of dentin structure. Dent Clin North Amer 2002;46:277-301.
  5. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:397-412.
  6. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 1997;25:441-458.
  7. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 2002;30:83-90.
  8. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999;15:128-137.
  9. A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled and adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent 2001;29:435-441.
  10. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations – a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2002;18:295-303.
  11. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composites. J Dent Res 2000;79:812-817.
  12. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of class V composite resin restorations. Am J Dent 2003:16:409-413.
  13. Effect of LED curing on microleakage and microhardness of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Int Dent J 2004;54:15-20.
  14. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371-382.
  15. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:27-40.
  16. Effect of multiple application of a dentin adhesive on contraction gap width of a resin-based composite. Am J Dent 2002;15:159-163.
  17. Effects of adhesive composition on microtensile bond strength to human dentin. Am J Dent 2001;14:340-343.
  18. Distribution of nanofillers from a simplified-step adhesive in acid-conditioned dentin. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:103-117.
  19. Flowable composites as “filled adhesives”: a microleakage study. The J Contemp Dent Prac 2004;5:32-41.
  20. Dynamic and static moduli of elasticity resin-based materials. Dent. Mater 2002;18:64-71.
  21. Effect of primer coats composite bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1995;74:34 (Abst 182).
  22. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent 1997;22:194-199.
  23. The effect of light-curing modes on the microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. J Dent 2004;32:247-254.
  24. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001;29: 1-6.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.