The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2007 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Influence of Commercially Pure Titanium and Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium Alloy on the Final Shade of Low-fusing Porcelain

Khalid A. Al Wazzan, Ibrahim S. Al Hussaini

Citation Information : Al Wazzan KA, Al Hussaini IS. The Influence of Commercially Pure Titanium and Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium Alloy on the Final Shade of Low-fusing Porcelain. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (2):97-104.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-2-97

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-02-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aims

The aims of this study were to investigate the influence of commercially pure titanium (PTi) and titaniumaluminum- vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloys (TiA) on the final shade of low-fusing porcelain bonded to them and to compare the shade changes with those of three conventional metal-ceramic systems.

Methods and Materials

A titanium casting unit was used to cast PTi and Ti-6Al-4V alloy specimens followed by A3 shade low-fusing porcelain (Noritake) being bonded to them. Gold-based (AuA), palladium-based (PdA), and nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr) alloys were cast with an automatic centrifugal casting machine, then A3 shade conventional porcelain material (Vita, VMK 95) was applied to them. Ten specimens of each metal were then fabricated. The CIE L* a* b* color coordinates of the specimens were measured with a spectrophotometer.

Results

All alloys had significant color changes when compared with A3 shade tabs. The color differences from the shade tabs were 5.79 for the Ti-6Al-4V group, 6.46 for PdA alloy, 8.12 for AuA alloy, 8.15 for Ni-Cr alloy, and 12.58 for PTi. The specimens differed from the shade tabs primarily because of the differences in a* and b* coordinate values.

Conclusions

Predictable shade reproduction of metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs) may be impaired by the underlying metal. The PTi had the greatest color differences among all the tested metal when compared with the shade tabs, whereas the Ti-6Al-4V alloy had the lowest. PTi is more likely to affect the final shade of low-fusing porcelain than Ti-6Al-4V alloy.

Citation

Al Wazzan KA, Al Hussaini IS. The Influence of Commercially Pure Titanium and Titanium-Aluminum- Vanadium Alloy on the Final Shade of Low-fusing Porcelain. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 February;(8)2:097-104.


PDF Share
  1. Biocompatibility of titanium implants: surface science aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:832-7.
  2. Federation Dentaire Internationale. Technical Report No. 34. Int Dent J. 1990;40:54-5.
  3. Titanium for prosthodontic applications: A review of the literature. Quintessence Int 1996;27:401-8.
  4. Clinical application of pure titanium crowns. Dent Mater J 1985;4:191-5.
  5. Non-cast titanium restorations in fixed prosthodontics. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:281-7.
  6. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:194-200.
  7. Oxidation effects on porcelain-titanium interface reactions and bond strength. Dent Mater J 1990;9:91-9.
  8. Oxide adherence and porcelain bonding to titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Dent Res 1990 69:1230-5.
  9. Bond strength of three porcelains to two forms of titanium using two firing atmospheres. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:567-74.
  10. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength of low fusing porcelain to commercially pure titanium. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:350-6.
  11. Brien WJ. Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:35-40.
  12. The effects of manipulative variables on the color of ceramic metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:297-303.
  13. Effect of Surface Treatment of Titanium on the Color of Low Fusing Porcelain. Egyptian Dent J. In press 2005.
  14. Spectrophotometric study of five porcelain shades relative to the dimensions of color, porcelain thickness, and repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:96-105.
  15. Spectrometric analysis of the influence of metal substrates on the color of metal-ceramic restorations. J Dent Res 1985;64:74-7.
  16. Effect of porcelain thickness and type of metalceramic alloy on color. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:138-45.
  17. The influence of different thicknesses of dentin porcelain on the color reflected from thin opaque porcelain fused to metal. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:352-6.
  18. Detecting silver-containing metal ceramic alloys that discolor porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:563-8.
  19. A qualitative study for the bond and color of ceramometals. Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:169-79.
  20. Effect of different metal ceramic alloys on the color of opaque and dentin porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:351-6.
  21. Spectrophotometric analysis of a nongreening, metal-fusing porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:634-41.
  22. Effect of porcelain crown substructures on visually perceivable value. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:209-12.
  23. Connor RP, Mackert JR Jr, Myers ML, Parry EE. Castability, opaque masking, and porcelain bonding of 17 porcelain-fused-to-metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:367-74.
  24. Effect of different highpalladium metal-ceramic alloys on the color of opaque porcelain. J Prosthodont 2000;9:71-6.
  25. Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:143-9.
  26. A study of various factors influencing shade of bonded porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:282-4.
  27. Brien WJ. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1989;68:1755-9.
  28. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:1760-4.
  29. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:155-62.
  30. eclairage: Colorimetry: Official recomendations of the international commission on illumination. Publication CIE No. 15 (E-1.3.1). Paris: Bureau Central de la CIE; 1971.
  31. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68:819-22.
  32. Composition and functional characteristics of precious metal alloys for dental restorations. In: Valega TM (ed). Alternatives to Gold Alloys in Dentistry. Washington DC: United States Department of Health, 1977;62-63.
  33. Double-layer porcelain veneers: Effect of layering on resulting veneer color. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:425-31.
  34. Titanium and titanium alloys as dental materials. Int Dent J 1993;43:245-53.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.