The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2007 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Comparison of Two Different Methods and Materials Used to Repair Polycarbonate Crowns

Asude Yilmaz

Citation Information : Yilmaz A. A Comparison of Two Different Methods and Materials Used to Repair Polycarbonate Crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (2):105-112.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-2-105

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-02-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength and crown-repair material interface of polycarbonate crown repaired using flowable resin composite and hybrid resin composite following two different surface preparations.

Methods and Materials

The facial surfaces of fifty-two polycarbonate crowns were flattened and roughened. Specimens were then divided into four test groups. A bonding agent alone (Groups 1 and 2) or a combination of methylmethacrylate (MMA) + bonding agent (Groups 3 and 4) was applied to the prepared surfaces. Then either a flowable (Groups 1 and 3) or a microfilled hybrid (Groups 2 and 4) resin composite was placed on the surfaces. Forty-eight of the original fifty-two specimens were used for shear bond strength testing. Failure types (adhesive, cohesive, and mixed) were evaluated. The remaining four specimens, one from each group, were used for crown-resin composite interface analysis using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Results

There were significant differences in both mean shear bond strength values and failure types (P<0.05). The SEM evaluation revealed a close interface relationship in Groups 3 and 4.

Conclusion

MMA monomer application on a polycarbonate crown prior to application of an adhesive agent improved the shear bond strength of the repair material.

Citation

Yilmaz A. A Comparison of Two Different Methods and Materials Used to Repair Polycarbonate Crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 February;(8)2:0105-112.


PDF Share
  1. Temporary restorations: A review. Oper Dent 1986;11:103-110.
  2. A modified technique for the restoration of primary incisors with polycarbonate crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 1975;90:989-991.
  3. Fabrication of a single anterior immediate restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:574-577.
  4. An improved method to cement polycarbonate crowns on deciduous anterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1977;2:47-50.
  5. Pediatric Dentistry Infancy Through Adolescence. 2nd ed., Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co 1994;246-249.
  6. The Comparison of tensile strength and shear strength of esthetic crowns used in primary teeth. Ataturk Univ Sagğlık Bil Ens Pedod ABD, Doktora Tezi Erzurum-Türkiye, 2000. (in Turkish).
  7. The evaluation of fracture strength of various temporary crown materials. Ataturk Univ Sagğlık Bil Ens Protetik Dis Tedavisi ABD, Doktora Tezi Erzurum-Türkiye, 2001. (in Turkish).
  8. Correlation study of incisive biting forces with age, sex, and anterior occlusion. J Dent Res 1972;52:698-702.
  9. Bite force determination in children with primary dentition. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1174-1180.
  10. An improved technique for the retention of polycarbonate crowns. J Dent Child 1977;44:108-110.
  11. Pediatric Dentistry. St. Louis: CV Mosby 1982;894-898.
  12. Restoring the ageing detition:repair or replacement? Int Dent J 1990;40:275-282.
  13. Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J 1993;43:466-472.
  14. Shear bond strength of bis-acryl composite provisional material repaired with flowable composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14:47-52.
  15. The retentive ability of various cementing agents for polycarbonate crowns. J Dent Child 1976;43:333-339.
  16. Effect of eugenol and eugenol cements on cured composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:211-215.
  17. Bonding to dental substrates. In:Craig RG, Powers JM (eds). Restorative Dental Materials. 11th ed., St. Louis: Mosby Inc 2002;259-286.
  18. Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive Class I resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 1996;12:230-235.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.