The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 4 ( May, 2007 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of an In-office Bleaching System (ZOOM™) on Pulp Chamber Temperature In Vitro

A. Rüya Yazici, Gerard Kugel, Azita Khanbodaghi

Citation Information : Yazici AR, Kugel G, Khanbodaghi A. Effects of an In-office Bleaching System (ZOOM™) on Pulp Chamber Temperature In Vitro. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (4):19-26.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-4-19

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-05-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

Several new techniques and materials for in-office bleaching have been introduced recently. The aim of this in vitro study was to measure the temperature increase in the pulp chamber of extracted teeth produced by the Zoom!™ in-office bleaching system and to investigate the influence of this light in conjunction with the bleaching gel on pulp temperature rise.

Methods and Materials

Ten extracted, caries-free, unrestored human maxillary central incisor teeth were used for the study. The root of each tooth was cut approximately 2-3 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), and the apical orifice of the root canal was enlarged. The remaining pulp tissue was removed and the empty pulp chamber was filled with a heat sink compound. A thin K-type thermocouple was inserted into the pulp chamber through the cut root area. The root surfaces of the teeth were partially submerged in a water bath during the testing procedure at 37°C. A whitening gel containing 25% hydrogen peroxide was applied to the buccal surfaces of all ten teeth and exposed to a Zoom!™ activation light for twenty minutes for three times; this was designated as Group I. The same teeth were then exposed with the Zoom!™ light for the same time period without the application of the bleaching gel and designated as Group II.

The intrapulpal temperature pre-treatment (baseline) and the temperature increase during treatment was measured for both treatment groups.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.003). Application of the Zoom!™ light in conjuction with the application of bleaching gel produced a greater temperature rise than did the light alone. The mean temperature rise for Group I (light and bleaching gel) was 1.11°C (0.18°C) and 1.01°C (0.12°C) for Group II (light alone) at the end of a five-minute exposure.

Conclusion

The Zoom!™ light either used with or without bleaching gel showed no significant increase in the intrapulpal temperature of teeth when used for the recommended exposure time.

Citation

Yazici AR, Khanbodaghi A, Kugel G. Effects of an In-office Bleaching System (ZOOM™) on Pulp Chamber Temperature In Vitro. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 May;(8)4:019-026.


PDF Share
  1. A clinical study evaluating a new chairside and take-home whitening system. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:289-297.
  2. Tooth whitening in children. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002;23:22-27.
  3. ADA supports vital tooth bleaching-but look for seal. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128(suppl):3S-5S.
  4. Nightguard vital bleaching. Quintessence Int 1989;20:173-176.
  5. Light augments tooth whitening with peroxide. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:167-175.
  6. Vital tooth bleaching: sensitivity and pulpal considerations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:suppl:41S-44S.
  7. Thermal injury to normal dog teeth: in vivo measurements to pulp temperature increases and their effect on the pulp tissue. J Dent Res 1952;31:548-558.
  8. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;19:515-530.
  9. Temperature rise in the pulp chamber induced by a conventional halogen light-curing source and a plasma arc lamp. Am J Dent 2004;17:203-208.
  10. Thermal emission and curing efficiency of LED and halogen curing lights. Oper Dent 2005;30(2):257-264.
  11. Comparison of temperature changes induced by various light curing units, in vitro. Oper Dent 2006;31(2):261-265.
  12. The current status of vital tooth whitening techniques. Compendium 1999;20:781-794.
  13. Pulp chamber penetration by hydrogen peroxide following vital bleaching procedures. J Endod 1987;13:375-377.
  14. Vital bleaching: the effect of heat and hydrogen peroxide on pulpal enzymes. J Endod 1986;12:108-112.
  15. In-office vital tooth bleaching – what do lights add? Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:340-352.
  16. Colorimetric assessment of laser and home bleaching techniques. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(2):1187-94.
  17. Why resin curing lights do not increase tooth lightening. CRA Newsletter 2000;24(8):3.
  18. Effect of light energy on peroxide tooth bleaching. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135(2):194-201.
  19. Measurement of temperature generated by visible light-cure lamps in an in vitro model. Dent Mater 1989;5:230-234.
  20. Pulpal temperature rise during light-activated bleaching. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;72(2):254-9.
  21. Surface and intra-pulpal temperature rises during tooth bleaching: an in vitro study. Br Dent J 2005;199(1):37-40.
  22. Effect of light-enhanced bleaching on in vitro surface and intrapulpal temperature rise. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13(6): 370-378.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.