The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 5 ( July, 2007 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Dentin Bond Strength of Composites with Self-etching Adhesives Using LED Curing Lights

Yonca Korkmaz, Nuray Attar

Citation Information : Korkmaz Y, Attar N. Dentin Bond Strength of Composites with Self-etching Adhesives Using LED Curing Lights. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (5):34-42.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-5-34

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-07-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of light-emitting diode (LED) light curing units (LCUs) compared with halogen LCUs on the shear bond strength (SBS) of one nanofill composite (Filtek Supreme) and one microhibrid composite (Artemis) with self-etch adhesives.

Methods and Materials

The buccal surfaces of 60 non-carious extracted human molars were flattened to expose dentin and, subsequently, polished for 60 seconds with 600-grit wet silicon carbide abrasive paper. Specimens were assigned into six groups (n=10) according to composite material, self-etch adhesive, and curing light used as follows: Group 1: Adper Prompt L-Pop (AP) and Filtek Supreme (FS) using an Elipar Free Light (EFL); Group 2: AP and FS using an Elipar Free Light 2 (EFL2); Group 3: AP and FS using a Hilux Expert (HE) light, Group 4: AdheSE (AS)+Artemis (AR) using an EFL; Group 5: AS+AR using an EFL2; and Group 6: AS+AR using a HE light. The specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles (5°C–55°C) and then loaded to failure in a Zwick universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/minute. SBS values were calculated as megapascals (MPa) and statistically analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test at a significance level of 0.05.

Results

Mean SBS (± standard deviations) values were as follows: Group1: 15.99±5.18; Group 2: 18.76±6.71; Group 3: 17.70±5.04; Group 4: 16.93±3.99; Group 5: 18.01±5.19, and Group 6: 17.46±5.40. There were no statistically significant differences for SBS to dentin among the groups tested.

Conclusion

The LED curing lights used in the study seem to be comparable with the halogen curing light for nanofill and microhybrid composites used in conjunction with self-etching systems in dentin. The EFL2 reduces curing time, which can be considered as an advantage.

Citation

Korkmaz Y, Attar N. Dentin Bond Strength of Composites with Self-etching Adhesives Using LED Curing Lights. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 July;(8)5:034-042.


PDF Share
  1. Effect of a LED versus halogen light cure polymerization on the curing characteristics of three composite resins. Am J Dent 2003;16:323-328.
  2. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. XVIII: synthesis of a polyfunctional surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res 1979;58:1101-1107.
  3. A visible light-cured composite restorative. Clinical open assessment. Br Dent J 1978;145:327-330.
  4. Blue light emitting diodes╌another method of light curing? Br Dent J 1995;178:169.
  5. Evaluation of a dual peak third generation LED curing light. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005;26:331-338.
  6. Optical power outputs, spectra and dental composite depths of cure, obtained with blue light emitting diode (LED) and halogen light curing units (LCUs). Br Dent J 2002;193:459-463.
  7. A comparison of polymerization by light-emitting diode and halogen-based lightcuring units. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:335-341.
  8. Effect of irradiation type (LED or QTH) on photo-activated composite shrinkage strain kinetics, temperature rise, and hardness. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:471-479.
  9. The effectiveness of cure of LED and halogen curing lights at varying cavity depths. Oper Dent 2003;28:707-715.
  10. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations. Am J Dent 2003;16:409-413.
  11. Clinical performance of self-etch adhesives at 18 months. Am J Dent 2005;18:135-140.
  12. Practitioner variability effects on dentin bonding with an acetone-based one-bottle adhesive. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:311-314.
  13. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2003;16:414-420.
  14. “No-bottle” vs “multi-bottle” dentin adhesives–a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001;17:373-380.
  15. Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacture. Oper Dent 2005;30:492-499.
  16. Paul, MN 55144–1000 October 5-8.
  17. Polymerization of orthodontic resin cement with light emitting diode curing units. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:236-241.
  18. Effect of LED curing on the microleakage, shear bond strength and surface hardness of a resin-based composite restoration. Biomaterials 2005;26:3981-3986.
  19. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
  20. Dentin bonding–questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:191-209.
  21. Bonding to enamel and dentin using self-etching adhesive systems. Quintessence Int 2004;35:367-370.
  22. Shear bond strength of a selfetching adhesive in primary and permanent dentition. Am J Dent 2005;18:331-334.
  23. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308.
  24. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives Quintessence Int 2000;31: 353-358.
  25. Bond strength of composite to dentin using self-etching adhesive systems Quintessence Int 2005;36:259-262.
  26. Laboratory evaluation of adhesive systems. Oper Dent (Supplement 5) 1992;50-61.
  27. A tensile test to facilitate identification of defects in dentine bonded specimens. J Dent 1998;26:379-385.
  28. Effects of dentin surface treatments on the fracture toughness and tensile bond strength of a dentin-composite adhesive interface. J Dent Res 1994;73:1530-1538.
  29. Novel fracture toughness test using a notchless triangular prism (NTP) specimen. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;31:457-463.
  30. Factors that affect the shear bond strength of multiple component and single bottle adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent 2003;16:120-124.
  31. Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers/adhesives. Oper Dent 2005;30:63-68.
  32. SEM evaluation of contemporary self-etching primers applied to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:203-211.
  33. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63: 1396-1399.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.