The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 5 ( July, 2007 ) > List of Articles


Temporomandibular Disorders Do Not Correlate with Detectable Alterations in Body Posture

Giuseppe Perinetti

Citation Information : Perinetti G. Temporomandibular Disorders Do Not Correlate with Detectable Alterations in Body Posture. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (5):60-67.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-5-60

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-09-2008

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; The Author(s).



This study aimed to determine if temporomandibular disorders (TMD) correlate with alterations in body posture detectable through posturography.

Methods and Materials

Thirty-five asymptomatic subjects and 35 TMD patients (34 males and 36 females; mean age, 27.7±8.6 years) constituted the matched control and TMD groups, respectively. Posturography was performed under four different experimental conditions: (a) eyes open with mandibular rest position (Eyes Open RP); (b) eyes open with dental occlusion (Eyes Open DO); (c) eyes closed with mandibular rest position (Eyes Closed RP); and (d) eyes closed with dental occlusion (Eyes Closed DO). The X, Y, and absolute centre of pressure displacements from the projection of a theoretical barycentre and the sway area, sway length, and sway velocity were recorded as static and dynamic posturographic parameters, respectively.


Generally, no differences were found in any of these parameters between the groups and between the RP and DO within either Eyes Open/Closed conditions. The only differences were found under Eyes Closed as compared to Eyes Open, irrespective of the RP/DO conditions for dynamic and not for static posturographic parameters.


This study failed to show detectable alterations in body posture in TMD patients.


Perinetti G. Temporomandibular Disorders Do Not Correlate with Detectable Alterations in Body Posture. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 July;(8)5:060-067.

PDF Share
  1. Mandibular Rest Position: Relationship to Occlusion, Posture and Muscle Activity. In: New Concepts in Craniomandibular and Chronic Pain Management. London : Mosby-Wolf. pp. 163-75. 1994.
  2. Temporomandibular disorders in relation to craniofacial dimensions, head posture and bite force in children selected for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:179-92.
  3. Postural differences between asymptomatic men and women and craniofacial pain patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:653-656.
  4. The effect of occlusal alteration and masticatory imbalance on the cervical spine. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:457-463.
  5. Primary trigeminal afferents to the vestibular nuclei in the rat: existence of a collateral projection to the vestibulo-cerebellum. Neurosci Lett 1999;264:133-136.
  6. Sensory representation in the cerebellum and control circuits of motion. Eur J Morphol 1997;35:234-245.
  7. Nineteenth-century contributions to the mechanical recording of postural sway. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1147-1150.
  8. An overview of the clinical use of dynamic posturography in the differential diagnosis of balance disorders. J Vestib Res 1999;9:223-252.
  9. Occlusion and centre of foot pressure variation: is there a relationship? J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:302-308.
  10. Dental occlusion modifies gaze and posture stabilization in human subjects. Neuroscience Lett 2000;293:203-206.
  11. Unilateral anaesthesia modifies postural control in human subjects. Neuroscience Lett 2002;330:179-182.
  12. Effects of different jaw relations on postural stability in human subjects. Neurosci Lett 2004; 356: 228-230.
  13. Dental occlusion and body posture: No detectable correlation. Gait Posture 2006;24:165-168.
  14. Cranio 2005;23:269-277
  15. Comparison of static and dynamic posturography in young and older normal people. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:405-412.
  16. Angle classification revisited. 2: A modified Angle classification. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:277-284.
  17. The glossary of occlusal terms. 1985.
  18. Oro-facial pain in the community: prevalence and associated impact. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002;30:52-60.
  19. Prevalence study of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in university students. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:283-289.
  20. Some methods and parameters of body sway quantification and their neurological applications. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 1980;228:135-150.
  21. Intrasubject variability of selected force-platform parameters in the quantification of postural control. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:1144-1150.
  22. Visual-vestibular control of posture and gait: physiological mechanisms and disorders. Curr Opin Neurol 1999;12:5-11.
  23. Ageing and balance: the measurement of spontaneous sway by posturography. Gerontology 1994;40:273-278.
  24. Body sway and vision. J Exp Psychol 1946;36:526-536.
  25. Developmental Biology. 7th ed. Sunderland : Sinauer Associates, 2003.
  26. Adaptation of postural control to perturbations – a process that initiates long-term motor memory. Gait Posture 2002;15:75-82.
  27. Is there a relationship between head posture and craniomandibular pain? J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1030-1036.
  28. The association between head and cervical posture and temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review. J Orofac Pain 2006; 20: 9-23.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.