The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 6 ( September, 2007 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Light Curing Modes and Light Curing Time on the Microhardness of a Hybrid Composite Resin

José Roberto Lovadino, Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano, Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar, Aline Braceiro, Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima

Citation Information : Lovadino JR, Ambrosano GM, Aguiar FH, Braceiro A, Lima DA. Effect of Light Curing Modes and Light Curing Time on the Microhardness of a Hybrid Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (6):1-8.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-6-1

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-09-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aims

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of light curing modes and curing time on the microhardness of a hybrid composite resin.

Methods and Materials

Forty-five Z250 composite resin specimens (3M-ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA) were randomly divided into nine groups (n=5): three polymerization modes (conventional - 550 mW/ cm2; light-emitting diodes (LED) - 360mW/cm2, and high intensity - 1160 mW/cm2) and three light curing times (once, twice, and three times the manufacturer's recommendations). All samples were polymerized with the light tip 8 mm from the specimen. Knoop microhardness measurements were obtained on the top and bottom surfaces of the sample.

Results

Conventional and LED polymerization modes resulted in higher hardness means and were statistically different from the high intensity mode in almost all experimental conditions. Tripling manufacturers’ recommended light curing times resulted in higher hardness means; this was statistically different from the other times for all polymerization modes in the bottom surface of specimens. This was also true of the top surface of specimens cured using the high intensity mode but not of conventional and LED modes using any of the chosen curing times. Top surfaces showed higher hardness than bottom surfaces.

Conclusions

It is important to increase the light curing time and use appropriate light curing devices to polymerize resin composite in deep cavities to maximize the hardness of hybrid composite resins.

Citation

Aguiar FHB, Braceiro A, Lima DANL, Ambrosano GMB, Lovadino JR. Effect of Light Curing Modes and Light Curing Time on the Microhardness of a Hybrid Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 September; (8)6:001-008.


PDF Share
  1. Light-curing Technology: past, present, and future. Compendium. 2003;23 18-24.
  2. Packable composites: Overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11 234-249.
  3. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of lightcured packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2000;16 33-40.
  4. Marginal adaptation of class V restorations with and without softstart-polymerization. Oper Dent. 2000;25 26-32.
  5. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1990;6 167-171.
  6. Effect of light source and specimen thickness on the surface hardness of resin composite. Am J Dent. 2002;15 47-53.
  7. Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of resin composite samples with blue diodes. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28 586-591.
  8. Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent. 2000;25 113-120.
  9. Influence of curing tip distance on composite Knoop hardness values. Braz Dent J. 2000;11 11-17.
  10. Fourier transform infrared analysis of degree of polymerization of unfilled resins: methods comparison. J Dent Res. 1984;631093.
  11. Effect of the air, dentin and resin-based composite thickness on light intensity reduction. Am J Dent. 1999;12 231-234.
  12. The effect of the photopolymerization method on the quality of composite resin samples. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25 436-442.
  13. Vicker Hardness of Hybrid Composites Cured by High Power Curing Lights. J Dent Res. 2001; Special Issue, 80 Abstract (1743).
  14. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without softstart-polymerization. Oper Dent. 1997;25 321-330.
  15. Advances in light curing. Am J Dent. 2000;13 77-81.
  16. Effect of irradiation type (LED or QTH) on photo-activated composite shrinkage strain kinetics, temperature rise, and hardness. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110 471-479.
  17. Hardness evaluation of a dental composite resin polymerized with experimental LED-based devices. Dental Materials. 2001;17 309-315.
  18. Depth of cure and compressive strength of dental composites cured with blue light emitting diodes (LEDs). Dent Mater. 2000;16 41-47.
  19. Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology. Br Dent J. 1999;186 388-91.
  20. Composite cure and shrinkage associated with high intensity curing light. Oper Dent. 2003;28 357-364.
  21. Effectiveness of composite cure associated with different curing modes of LED lights. Oper Dent. 2003;28 371-377.
  22. Some factors influencing the depth of cure of visible light-activated composite resin. Aust Dent J. 1990;35 213-218.
  23. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res. 1982;90(6):484-9.
  24. A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res. 1987;66 727-730.
  25. Correlação entre grau de conversão, microdureza e conteúdo inorgânico em compósitos. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2002;16 349-354.
  26. Degree of polymerization of resin composite by different light sources. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2002;29 1165-1173.
  27. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent. 1994;19 26-32.
  28. How light irradiance and curing time affect monomer conversion in lightcured resin composites. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111:536-542.
  29. Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units. Dent Mater. 2000;16 330-336.
  30. Polymer structure of a light-cured resin composite in relation to distance from the surface. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111 277-279.
  31. Depth of cure and surface microhardness of composite resin cured with blue LED curing lights. Dent Mater. 2004;20(4):364-9.
  32. Influence of composition on rate of polymerization contraction of lightcuring resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60 146-150.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.