The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 6 ( September, 2007 ) > List of Articles


Augmentation in Two Stages of Atrophic Alveolar Bone Prior to Dental Rehabilitation: A Case Report

Ahmed A. Zahrani

Citation Information : Zahrani AA. Augmentation in Two Stages of Atrophic Alveolar Bone Prior to Dental Rehabilitation: A Case Report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (6):57-63.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-6-57

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-09-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.



The aim of this report is to describe a significantly deficient case of alveolar bone that was managed by alveolar bone augmentation using a technique of distraction osteogensis and onlay bone grafting prior to dental implant placement.


Injury to the teeth and alveolar ridge of the maxillary anterior region can cause a severe alveolar ridge deficiency resulting in ridge atrophy and maxillary retrognathism. The loss of these teeth and alveolar bone together with fibrotic scar formation can result in adverse changes of the interarch space, occlusal plane, arch relationship, and arch form which complicates rehabilitation and can compromise the esthetic outcome. While implant dentistry has become a new paradigm in oral reconstruction and replacement of missing teeth, ideal implant positioning can be compromised by inadequate alveolar bone in terms of bone height, width, and quality of the bone itself. Correction of osseous deficiencies with ridge augmentation allows ideal implant placement and creates a more natural soft tissue profile which influences crown anatomy and esthetics.


A 20-year-old female presented with a complaint of poor esthetics resulting from oral injuries incurred in a traffic accident six years previously. In addition to a mandibular parasymphyseal fracture, five maxillary anterior teeth and the most of the alveolar ridge were lost. Clinical examination revealed severe loss of bone in the maxillary anterior region, an absence of a labial sulcus, loss of upper lip support, and a slight over eruption of the mandibular anterior teeth. In preparation for dental implants a distraction osteogenesis surgical procedure was done to lengthen the height of the alveolar ridge. After a three-month healing period, the width of the residual ridge was found to be insufficient for implant placement. To correct this deficiency, a bone graft of a cortiocancellous block was harvested from the chin and fixed to the labial aspect of the ridge. To facilitate revascularization, small perforations were made in the cortical bone of the alveolar ridge at the recipient site before cancellous bone retrieved from the donor site was gently placed between the bone block and the ridge. The patient was then appropriately medicated and healing was uneventful. After three months, the width of the residual ridge was assessed to be adequate for endosseous implants.


The clinical result reported here has shown several procedures may be necessary for the rehabilitation of a trauma patient. Distraction osteogenesis per se may not always satisfactorily improve the anatomical alveolar anatomy but it has advantages over other methods of augmentation. It can improve the height and also expand the soft tissue for further bone grafting. Augmentation of the alveolar bone with an onlay bone graft often provides the desired gain of bone, allows for the ideal placement of dental implants, and improves any discrepancy between the upper and lower arches.


Zahrani AA. Augmentation in Two Stages of Atrophic Alveolar Bone Prior to Dental Rehabilitation: A Case Report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 September;(8)6:057-063.

PDF Share
  1. Bone loss of edentulous alveolar ridges. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:266-271.
  2. A classification of edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1988;17:232-236.
  3. Multidisciplinary approach for the rehabilitation of dentoalveolar trauma. Dental Trumatology 2004;20:293-299.
  4. Multidisciplinary treatment approach for enhancement of implant esthetics. Implant Dentistry 2005;14:21-27.
  5. Reconstruction of severely resorbed edentulous maxillae using osseointegrated fixtures in immediate autogenous bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:233-246.
  6. Alveolar ridge repair using resorbable membrane and autogenous bone particles with simultaneous placement of implants. An Experimental Pilot study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:364-373.
  7. Reconstruction of alveolar defect prior to implant placement. Select reading in OMS 2003;11:1.
  8. Distraction osteogenesis of the nasal and antaral osseous floor to enhance alveolar height. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:123-130.
  9. Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using a simple device that permits secondary implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:95-102.
  10. Intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for extensive reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges. J Periodontal 2005;76:636-641.
  11. Horizontal distraction of the anterior maxilla in combination with bilateral sinus-lift operation- preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:37-44.
  12. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preservation. Clin Orthop 1989;238:249-281.
  13. Osseous graft in intraoral site. J Oral Implantol 1996;22;51-52.
  14. Vertical alveolar bone distraction at molar region using lag screw principle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:787-794.
  15. Healing process after alveolar ridge distraction in Sheep. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radio Endod 2000; 90: 420-429.
  16. Horizontal alveolar distraction of the narrow maxillary ridge for implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1530-1534.
  17. Endossous implants in horizontal alveolar ridge distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxilloafac Impnats 2002:17:846-853.
  18. Effect of autogenous harvest site location on the outcome of ridge augmentation for implant dehiscences. Int J Periodontics Restortaive Dent 2004;24:155-163.
  19. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implants placement. Int J Oral Maxilloafc Implants 1997;12:267-776.
  20. Volume maintenance of onlay bone graft in the craniofacial skeleton. microarchitedure versus embryologic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:291-297.
  21. Brouns JJA. Rehabilitation of patients with severe (class VI) maxillary resorption using a Le Fort I osteotomy, interposed bone grafts and endosteal implants: 1-8 years follow-up on a two-stage procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;29:188-193.
  22. An animal model for subperiosteal tissue expansion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51: 1244-9.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.