The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 6 ( September, 2007 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Method of Gauging Dental Radiographs during Treatment Planning for Dental Implants

Sukumaran Anil, Hamdan S. Al-Ghamdi

Citation Information : Anil S, Al-Ghamdi HS. A Method of Gauging Dental Radiographs during Treatment Planning for Dental Implants. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (6):82-88.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-6-82

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-09-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The goal of pre-surgical dental implant treatment planning is to position the optimum number and size of implant fixtures to achieve the best restorative results. The purpose of this article is to describe the use of radiographic imaging software to calibrate and measure anatomical landmarks to overcome inherent distortions associated with dental radiographs. The procedure along with its potential use as an adjunct to radiographic interpretation in routine clinical implant practice is presented.

Background

Diagnostic imaging is an essential component of implant treatment planning, and a variety of advanced imaging modalities have been recommended to assist the dentist in assessing potential sites for implants. Although technological advances have resulted in new imaging innovations for implant dentistry, dental radiography remains the most widely used tool for determining the quantity and quality of alveolar bone as it is a non-invasive procedure. However, the unreliable magnification factor associated with conventional radiographs remains a major problem when estimating the amount of bone available at the implant site.

Summary

This image measurement technique is capable of assessing the bone quantity by measuring the height and width of the alveolar crest for a specified region in a two dimensional plane in any direction related to the visible landmarks in the oral cavity. These measurements can be used by the clinician to select the type of implant and its position. Since there is no additional equipment or cost involved, the technique can be used as an important adjunct in implant practice.

Citation

Anil S, Al-Ghamdi HS. A Method of Gauging Dental Radiographs during Treatment Planning for Dental Implants. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 September; (8)6:082-088.


PDF Share
  1. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13(5):566-570.
  2. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8(2):151-161.
  3. The association between the failure of dental implants and cigarette smoking. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8(6):609-615.
  4. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8(3):161-172.
  5. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(5):537-552.
  6. Prognostic variables associated with implant failure: a retrospective effectiveness study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(3):400-406.
  7. Adaptive bone remodeling around oral implants under axial and nonaxial loading conditions in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12(2):215-223.
  8. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7(2):143-152.
  9. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15(3):268-283.
  10. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89(5):630-637.
  11. Diagnostic agreement of conventional and inverted scanned panoramic radiographs in the detection of the mandibular canal and the mental foramen. J Oral Implantol 2004; 30(1):2-6.
  12. A case for routine computed tomography imaging of the dental alveolus before implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59(1):64-67.
  13. A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32(6):397-400.
  14. Parallelism of implants visualised on the orthopantomogram. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;18(4):213-215.
  15. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(6):611-615.
  16. A review of panoramic radiography and its potential use in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 1993;2(2):122-130.
  17. Histologic evaluation of human biopsies after dental augmentation with a demineralized bone matrix putty. Implant Dent 2003;12(4):325-332.
  18. Long-term evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions: a prospective study. J Periodontol 1999;70(8):896-901.
  19. Immediate occlusal loading of Osseotite implants in the completely edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(4):544-551.
  20. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(4):475-485.
  21. A computer-assisted measurement technique to assess bone proximal to oral implants on intraoral radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12(3):225-229.
  22. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31(3):176-181.
  23. Assessment of three-dimensional X-ray images: reconstruction from conventional tomograms, compact computerized tomography images, and multislice helical computerized tomography images. J Oral Implantol 2005;31(5):234-241.
  24. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23(3):123-127.
  25. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decisionmaking criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(1):80-89.
  26. Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(5):409-414.
  27. Image-guided navigation system for placing dental implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2004;25(10):783-784.
  28. Quality of preimplant low-dose tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88(6):738-744.
  29. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral tomography of the maxilla and mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105(2):123-129.
  30. Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91(5):498-511.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.