The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 7 ( November, 2007 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Light Curing Units on Marginal Adaptation and Hardness of Class II Composite Resin Restorations

Larissa Maria Cavalcante, Alessandra Resende Peris, Luiz André Freire Pimenta, Nick Silikas

Citation Information : Cavalcante LM, Peris AR, Pimenta LA, Silikas N. Effect of Light Curing Units on Marginal Adaptation and Hardness of Class II Composite Resin Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (7):38-45.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-7-38

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-01-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aims

The aim of this study was to test the influence of different curing protocols on dentin marginal adaptation and the hardness of two composites.

Methods and Materials

Three light-curing-units (LCUs): Quartz-Tungsten-Halogen (QTH: 541mW/cm2), Argon-Ion-Laser (AL: 277mW/cm2), and Plasma-Arc-Curing (PAC: 1818mW/cm2) and two composites FiltekZ250 (F) and Tetric Ceram HB (TC) were tested. Sixty standardized “vertical-slot-Class II-cavities” were prepared at the mesial surface of bovine incisors and divided into six groups (n=10). Composites were placed using the Single Bond adhesive system and cured in 2 mm increments according to the manufacturers’ instructions. After polishing, epoxy replicas were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) marginal adaptation analysis at 500x magnification. The specimens were then sectioned transversally to the dental long axis, embedded in polyester resin, then polished and submitted to the Knoop hardness test at gingival and occlusal portions of the restoration. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test (p=0.05).

Results

The gap margins ranged between 4.3 to 5.8 μm, and no statistically significant differences were revealed in marginal adaptation for LCUs or for composites (p>0.05). Location influenced hardness (p≤0.01). The occlusal portion presented significantly higher KHN than the gingival portion for all composite-LCU combinations. Regardless of the LCU used, TC produced statistically significant lower hardness values (ranging between 82.8 to 110.7 KHN) than F (ranging between 105.9 to 117.3 KHN).

Conclusions

Hardness and gap formation were not dependent on the LCUs tested in this study. Different resin composite was found to be a significant factor with regards to hardness but not gap formation.

Citation

Cavalcante LM, Peris AR, Silikas N, Pimenta LAF. Effect of Light Curing Units on Marginal Adaptation and Hardness of Class II Composite Resin Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 November; (8)7:038-045.

PDF Share
  1. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater. Jan 2005;21(1):36-42.
  2. The effect of consistency, specimen geometry and adhesion on the axial polymerization shrinkage measurement of light cured composites. Dent Mater. Nov 2006;22(11):1071-1079.
  3. Association of photoactivation methods and low modulus liners on marginal adaptation of composite restorations. Acta Odontol Scand. Dec 2004;62(6):298-304.
  4. Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step light-activation. Dent Mater. Sep 2002;18(6):436-444.
  5. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater. Jul 2004;20(6):579-585.
  6. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. Nov 15 2005;6(4):17-25.
  7. The effects of filling techniques and a low-viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities. J Dent. Jan 2003;31(1):59-66.
  8. Effect of plasma arc curing on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent. Jun 2000;13(3):121-122.
  9. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc. Jun 1972;84(6):1349-1357.
  10. Marginal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations using incremental and bulk placement techniques: an ESEM study. J Oral Rehabil. Oct 2003;30(10):1000-1007.
  11. , Vieira LC. Effect of posterior resin composite placement technique on the resin-dentin interface formed in vivo. Quintessence Int. Feb 2004;35(2):156-161.
  12. Influence of polymerization technique on microleakage and microhardness of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. Mar-Apr 2003;28(2):200-206.
  13. The effect of irradiation wavelength bandwidth and spot size on the scraping depth and temperature rise in composite exposed to an argon laser or a conventional quartz-tungsten-halogen source. Dent Mater. May 2002;18(3):221-226.
  14. Effect of the increase of energy density on knoop hardness of dental composites light-cured by conventional QTH, LED and xenon plasma arc. Braz Dent J. 2005;16(3):218-224.
  15. Degree of polymerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil. Dec 2002;29(12):1165-1173.
  16. , Thompson JY, Pimenta LA. Effect of light-curing method on marginal adaptation, microleakage, and microhardness of composite restorations. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. Aug 2006;78(2):302-311.
  17. Influence of selected components on crosslink density in polymer structures. Eur J Oral Sci. Aug 2001;109(4):282-285.
  18. Influence of pulse-delay curing on softening of polymer structures. J Dent Res. Jun 2001;80(6):1570-1573.
  19. Influence of curing modes on crosslink density in polymer structures. J Dent. May 2004;32(4):321-326.
  20. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent. Mar 1988;59(3):297-300.
  21. Microleakage and gap formation of resin composite restorations polymerized with different techniques. Am J Dent. Jun 2004;17(3):156-160.
  22. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro. Oper Dent. Mar-Apr 2003;28(2):160-167.
  23. Depth of cure and marginal adaptation to dentin of xenon lamp polymerized resin composites. Oper Dent. Nov-Dec 2001;26(6):585-590.
  24. Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins using plasma-arc photocuring. Gen Dent. Sep-Oct 2001;49(5):473-479.
  25. The effect of light-curing modes on the microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. J Dent. 2004;32:247-254.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.