The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 7 ( November, 2007 ) > List of Articles


Determining Tooth Size Ratio in an Iranian-Azari Population

Behnam Mirzakouchaki, Shirin Shahrbaf, Reza Talebiyan

Citation Information : Mirzakouchaki B, Shahrbaf S, Talebiyan R. Determining Tooth Size Ratio in an Iranian-Azari Population. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (7):86-93.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-7-86

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-03-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; The Author(s).



The aim of this investigation was to determine the tooth size ratio in an Iranian-Azari population.

Method and Materials

The Bolton tooth size analysis was performed on a sample of 50 plaster models (25 male subjects, 25 female subjects) of Iranian-Azari subjects. The mesiodistal widths of all teeth were obtained and the Bolton anterior ratio and overall ratio were calculated. The mean, range, and standard deviation were calculated for the anterior and overall ratio, and a coefficient of variation was obtained for the tooth size ratio.


For the anterior ratio (3-3), the Iranian-Azari had a mean of 78.0 mm with a standard deviation of 3.1; the range was 73.68 to 84.6 mm. For the overall ratio (6-6), the mean was 92.0 mm with a standard deviation of 2.4; the range was 88.09 to 97.5 mm.


The results from the Iranian-Azari subjects in the study are similar to Bolton's original data for an American population. These values and the degree of variation were similar to the original data by Bolton, indicating the Bolton analysis for Caucasian samples can be transferred to an Iranian-Azari population. It also confirms no relevant sexual dimorphism exists, and these values are valid for both male and female subjects.


Mirzakouchaki B, Shahrbaf S, Talebiyan R. Determining Tooth Size Ratio in an Iranian-Azari Population. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 November; (8)7:086-093.

PDF Share
  1. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1958;28:113-130.
  2. The clinical application of tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod. 1962;48:504-529.
  3. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:303-307.
  4. An analysis of permanent mesiodistal crown size. Am J Orthod. 1971;59:488-500.
  5. Tooth-size discrepancy in mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod. 1977;72:2183-190.
  6. Bolton anterior tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:3307-313.
  7. The effect of tooth size discrepancy on occlusion: an experimental study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:184-191.
  8. Frequency of Bolton tooth size discrepancies among orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:24-27.
  9. Orthodontic treatment outcome: the relationship between anterior dental relations and anterior inter-arch tooth size discrepancy. J Orthod. 2003;30:237-244.
  10. Size relationship between the maxillary and mandibular anterior segments of the dental arch. Angle Orthod. 1957;27:138-147.
  11. Tooth-size discrepancies among different occlusion groups of southern Chinese children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:556-558.
  12. Tooth-width ratio discrepancies in a sample of Peruvian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:3361-365.
  13. Permanent mesiodistal tooth size of French-Canadians. J Can Dent Assoc. 1988;54:441-444.
  14. Mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth in Jordanians. Arch Oral Biol. 1996;41:641-645.
  15. Dental arches in various ethnic groups. Angle Orthod. 1971;41:293-299.
  16. Mesiodistal crown dimension of the permanent dentition of American Negroes. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:157-164.
  17. The Dentition of the South African Negro. Anniston, Al: Higginbotham Inc. 1982.
  18. Variation in dental occlusion and arches among Melanesians of Bougainville Island, Papua New Guinea. I. Methods, age changes, sex differences and population comparisons. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1977;47:195-208.
  19. Relation of sex and occlusion to mesiodistal tooth size. Am J Orthod. 1974;66:479-486.
  20. Sex difference in tooth size. J Dent Res. 1964;43:306-307.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.