The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 4 ( May, 2008 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Relative Impact of Patient Characteristics and Radiographic Variables on the Difficulty of Removing Impacted Mandibular Third Molars

Oladimeji A. Akadiri, Ambrose E. Obiechina, Juwon T. Arotiba, Abiodun O. Fasola

Citation Information : Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE, Arotiba JT, Fasola AO. Relative Impact of Patient Characteristics and Radiographic Variables on the Difficulty of Removing Impacted Mandibular Third Molars. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9 (4):51-58.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-9-4-51

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-11-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2008; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to assess the relative contributions of patient characteristics and radiographic variables to the difficulty of extraction of impacted mandibular third molars in a Nigerian population.

Methods and Materials

Seventy-nine consecutive patients undergoing mandibular third molar extractions were recruited for this prospective cohort study. Specific patient characteristics and radiographic variables were recorded. All extractions were performed under local anesthesia by the same oral surgeon, and the surgical difficulty was assessed based on the duration of surgery.

Results

Body weight (BW) (P=0.009) and body surface area (BSA) (P=0.004) were the significant patient characteristics while tooth impaction depth (P=0.002), number of roots (P=0.035), and tooth angulation (P=0.003) were the significant radiographic variables associated with surgical difficulty using a univariate analysis. A multiple linear regression model was constructed with these variables using surgical difficulty as the dependent variable. Radiographic factors were found to be the more important determinants of surgical difficulty with the depth of impaction (P=0.038) being the singular most important factor.

Conclusion

Although the difficulty of surgical removal of impacted lower third molars is dependent on BW, BSA, impaction depth, tooth angulation, and the number of roots, radiographic variables were of greater importance with impaction depth being the most important single factor.

Citation

Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE, Arotiba JT, Fasola AO. Relative Impact of Patient Characteristics and Radiographic Variables on the Difficulty of Removing Impacted Mandibular Third Molars. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 May; (9)4:051-058.


PDF Share
  1. Radiological variables of clinical significance in the extraction of impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Radiol Endod. 1997; 84:469-463.
  2. Classification of Surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molar. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 40: 26-31.
  3. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery. Br Dent J. 2001; 190:607-610.
  4. Estimating third molar extraction difficulty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63:427-434.
  5. An Outline of Oral Surgery, Part I. London, Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd. 1988.
  6. Comtemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, (2nd ed.) St. Louis, Mosby Inc. 1993.
  7. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified technique for removal. Dent Dig. 1933; 39:330.
  8. Oral Surgery. Philadephia, W.B Saunder (cited by Yuasa et al (2002) in: Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988; 40:26-31.
  9. Mandibular third molar removal: Risk factors for extended operation time, postoperative pain and complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Endod. 2004; 97:438-446.
  10. Principle of exodontia as applied to the impacted third molar. St. Louis, MO: American Medical Books. 1926.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.