ORIGINAL RESEARCH


https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2784
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Volume 21 | Issue 4 | Year 2020

Assessment of the Role of Vitamin D in the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus


Jazib Nazeer1, Supriya Singh2, Cheranjeevi Jayam3, Rohit Singh4, Md A Iqubal5, Revati Singh6

1Department of Oral Pathology, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India
2Private Practitioner, Patna, Bihar, India
3Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India
4Department of Prosthodontics, Crown, Bridge and Implantology, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India
5Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India
6Department of Dentistry, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India

Corresponding Author: Revati Singh, Department of Dentistry, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India, Phone: +91 9608217026, e-mail: revateesingh@gmail.com

How to cite this article Nazeer Z, Singh S, Jayam C, et al. Assessment of the Role of Vitamin D in the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020;21(4):390–395.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

ABSTRACT

Aim: Lichen planus is an autoimmune disease that can affect the skin and mucous membranes, including the oral mucosa. Vitamin D plays a very important role in the bone health along with boosting immunity. This study was carried out to assess the role of vitamin D in the treatment of oral lichen planus.

Materials and methods: A sample size of 450 was taken which included patients showing clinical presentation of oral lichen planus. The patients were equally divided into three different groups based on their vitamin D levels. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0.

Results: The patients who were given the vitamin D supplementation showed the maximum improvement. The comparison of the data were found to be statistically significant.

Conclusion: It was concluded that vitamin D played an important role in the treatment of oral lichen planus.

Clinical significance: The role of vitamin D in lichen planus needs to be explored. This study may be useful in conducting further study to assess the role in vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of oral lichen planus.

Keywords: Autoimmune disorder, Oral lichen planus, Vitamin D.

INTRODUCTION

Lichen planus is a chronic, inflammatory disease that affects the skin and mucous membranes including the oral mucosa. It is an autoimmune disease in which the skin cells and mucosal surfaces are targeted by the immune system. There is cytotoxic T-cell-mediated damage of the basal layer of the epithelium and chronic inflammation. There are different types of lichen planus such as reticular, plaque, papular, erosive, and ulcerative. Among all, reticular type is commonly seen in patients. Burning sensation is the most common symptom in patient f lichen planus. It is aggravated by ingestion of spicy food.

There are very few cases about 1–2% of oral lichen planus which can undergo malignant transformation. Earlier it was termed as a premalignant condition. Nowadays, it comes under “potentially malignant disorder” (WHO).1

Vitamin D is said to play an important role in the immune system. The vitamin D receptors (VDRs) are found on immune cells which include B cells, T cells, and antigen-presenting cells. The immune cells in the body synthesize the active metabolite of vitamin D. This active metabolite acts on the immune system and either downregulates or upregulates the differentiation of immune cells.

Vitamin D can also modulate innate and adaptive immune responses. The deficiency of vitamin D has been related to various autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, oral lichen planus, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis.2

Vitamin D acts on both B and T lymphocytes. The omnipresent expression of VDRs in myriad of immune cells such as activated T and B cells highlights the role of vitamin D in the modulation of various types of immunity like in the case of lichen planus.

Very few studies have been carried out to assess the role of vitamin D in the treatment of oral lichen planus. Thus, this study was conducted with the aim to assess whether vitamin D aided in the oral lichen planus treatment (Fig. 1).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sample size of 450 patients with various age groups having oral lichen planus (reticular) were taken reporting to the Department of Oral Medicine during the course of 6 months. The study was conducted in PDCH, Bihar. The simple random criteria were used for the selection of patients. The male to female ratio was 1:4. Informed consent was obtained from the patients for the study. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethical committee. The study sample was divided into three groups based on their vitamin D level range (Fig. 2).

Figs 1A and B: (A) Pretreatment picture (group I); (B) Posttreatment picture (group I)

Figs 2A and B: (A) Pretreatment picture (group II); (B) Posttreatment picture (group II)

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosed cases of oral lichen planus based on the clinical presentation
  • Patients from 35 years of age to 55 years of age
  • Patients who presented history of aggravation of the oral lichen planus
  • Patients who did not undergo oral lichen planus treatment

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who had oral lesion due to amalgam restoration or fixed dose reaction
  • Patients who were taking vitamin D supplementation
  • Patients who were taking systemic steroids
  • Pregnant ladies
  • Patients with bone pathology
  • Patients with any systemic disease
  • Patients under medication

A detailed history of patients was taken which included recording of aggravating factors, such as stress, detailed medical and dental history, and history of any medication. Complete oral examination was performed to fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The condition was diagnosed on the clinical presentation of histopathological report. The clinical diagnostic criteria used were bilateral presentation, the typical reticular pattern which is the characteristic of oral lichen planus and intolerance to spicy food. In cases of gingival desquamation and nonclarity of reticular pattern, biopsy was done to confirm the diagnosis of oral lichen planus (Fig. 3).

To elicit vitamin D deficiency, patients were asked about symptoms such as lower back pain, fatigue, hair loss, history of recent weight gain, and muscular pain. At the onset of study, none of the patients was on vitamin D supplementation.

For every patient, serum vitamin D level estimation was advised. The levels of vitamin D were considered sufficient if it was equal or more than 30 ng/mL, insufficient if it is in the range of 20–29 ng/mL and deficient if it is less than 20 ng/mL. Patients with serum vitamin D level less than 15 ng/mL were severe vitamin D deficiency. Patients with serum vitamin D level ranging between 15 ng/mL and 20 ng/mL were moderate vitamin D deficiency. Patients with serum vitamin D level more than 30 ng/mL were normal.

We divided the patients into three categories based on the serum levels of vitamin D and history of stress. Group I—patients with history of stress and serum vitamin D level less than 15 ng/mL. Group II—patients with serum vitamin D level less than 15 ng/mL with no history of stress. Group III (control)—patients with serum vitamin D level more than 30 ng/mL with no history of stress. Each group had 150 patients.

Figs 3A and B: (A) Pretreatment picture (group III); (B) Posttreatment picture (group III)

Table 1: Scoring system by Kaliakatsou et al. for clinical diagnosis and treatment outcome of the disease
Objective morphological findingsSubjective findings (symptoms)
0 = no lesionVAS score or burning sensation and pain
1 = white striae onlyMild to moderate burning 0–4
2 = white striae and erosion less than equal to 1 cm2Moderate burning 4–6
3 = white striae with erosion more than equal to 1 cm2Moderate to severe burning 6–10
4 = white striae with ulceration less than equal to 1 cm2
5 = white striae with ulceration more than equal to 1 cm2

VAS, visual analog scale

Table 2: Pretreatment objective symptoms among patients in various groups
Pretreatment objective symptoms4 (%)5 (%)Total (%)
Group I30 (20)120 (80)150 (100)
Group II32 (21.7)118 (78.3)150 (100)
Group III30 (20)120 (80)150 (100)
Total92 (20.5)358 (79.5)450 (100)
Table 3: Posttreatment objective symptoms among patients in various groups
Posttreatment objective0 (%)1 (%)2 (%)3 (%)4 (%)Total (%)
Group I20 (13.3)  65 (43.3)45 (30)  15 (10)  5 (3.3)150 (100)
Group II26 (17.4)  39 (26.1)20 (13)  65 (43.5)  0 (0)150 (100)
Group III  0 (0)  40 (26.7)30 (20)  50 (33.3)30 (20)150 (100)
Total46 (10.2)144 (32)95 (21.1)130 (28.9)35 (7.8)450 (100)

p value significant at the %3C;0.05 level

Group I patients were prescribed topical steroids, vitamin D supplements (60,000 IU weekly), and psychological counseling. Group II patients were put on topical steroids and vitamin D supplements only, and group III patients were prescribed topical steroids. The topical steroid application was withdrawn over a period of 4 weeks of the treatment.

All the patients of the three groups were kept on follow-up for 15 weeks. For the evaluation of oral lichen planus, we followed the scoring system given by Kaliakatsou et al. for clinical diagnosis as well as treatment outcome of the disease (Table 1).3

RESULTS

The data were evaluated and analyzed statistically using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) using descriptive statistics and ANOVA test with a significance of 0.05.

Table 2 shows that pretreatment objective symptoms score 5 was present in 120 patients in group I, 118 in group II and 120 in group III, score 4 in 30 in group I, 32 in group II and 30 in group III.

Table 3 shows that posttreatment objective following treatment; in group I, there were only five patients with score 4, whereas group II had no patient and group III had 30 patients. Score 0 was seen in 20 patients in group I, 26 in group II, and 0 in group III. There was significant improvement in both group I and II patients as compared to group III patients (p < 0.05). Those patients who regularly took vitamin D supplements weekly had improvement in burning sensation.

Table 4 shows that pretreatment subjective symptoms score 10 was seen in 110 patients in group I, 105 in group II, and 115 in group III, whereas score 8 was seen in 10 patients in group I, 6 in group II, and 5 in group III.

Table 4: Pretreatment subjective symptoms among patients in various groups
Pretreatment subjective8 (%)9 (%)10 (%)Total (%)
Group I10 (6.7)30 (20)110 (73.3)150 (100)
Group II6 (4.3)39 (26.1)105 (69.6)150 (100)
Group III5 (3.3)30 (20)115 (76.7)150 (100)
Total21 (4.6)99 (69)330 (73.3)450 (100)

Table 5 shows that posttreatment subjective symptom score 8 was seen in 11 patients in group III, whereas no patient in group I and group II had 8 score. Score 0 was seen in 60 patients in group I, 45 in group II, and no patient in group III. There was significant improvement in both group I and II patients as compared to group III patients (p < 0.05).

Table 6 and Fig. 4 show that mean vitamin D pretreatment level in group I was 13.2 ng/mL, in group II was 13.6 ng/mL, and in group III was 17.5 ng/mL. Posttreatment value was 16.4 ng/mL in group I, 15.6 ng/mL in group II and 17.8 ng/mL in group III. The difference is found to be significant in group I and group II patients. The effect of vitamin D supplementation was much better in group I and group II patients.

DISCUSSION

The results showed that vitamin D supplementation in group I oral lichen planus patients had marked improvement in burning sensation. In group II, there was also improvement in score as compared to group III.

Majority of the population in India is deficient in vitamin D but very few people know about it when they get it tested. Vitamin D is also known as the sunshine vitamin as on exposure to sun rays, the active metabolite of vitamin D is synthesized. The reason of deficiency of vitamin D levels among the population is decreased sun exposure. Also, the changing life style is playing an additional factor as people comparatively prefer to stay indoors than before.

Vitamin D also plays an important role in the homeostasis of calcium, which means it is important for calcium absorption. That is why, it helps in strengthening bones and teeth. Another form of vitamin D which is found in our body is the hormonal form.

In 1980, the role of vitamin D was found as an immune modulator. Various studies have suggested that VDRs on cells are related to immunity and the effect of hormonal form of vitamin D on the immune cells such as T and B cells indicates its importance.

Deficiency of vitamin D is very risky for a person as it makes them susceptible to various autoimmune diseases. The active form of vitamin D is 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3). It is a pleiotropic hormone which possesses comprehensive physiological activities.4

A study by Bhalla et al. has shown that monocytic cells have high-affinity binding sites for 1,25(OH)2D3.5 Veldman et al. in their study found that CD8 lymphocytes may be the major site of action of 1,25(OH)2D3.6 Alroy et al. in their in vitro study showed suppression of T-lymphocyte proliferation by 1,25(OH)2D3 due to which there is a decrease in interleukin 2, gamma interferon, and granulocyte-macrophage-stimulating factor mRNA levels. The transcriptional activators of the interleukin 2 gene are directly inhibited by a nuclear hormone receptor.7

Table 5: Posttreatment subjective symptom among patients in various groups
Posttreatment subjective0 (%)1 (%)2 (%)3 (%)4 (%)5 (%)6 (%)7 (%)8 (%)Total (%)
Group I  60 (40.1)40 (26.8)  30 (20)  0 (0)12 (6.8)0 (0)  4 (3.3)  4 (3.3)  0 (0)150 (100)
Group II  45 (30)26 (17.3)  26 (17.3)21 (13.9)13 (8.6)6 (4.3)13 (8.6)  0 (0)  0 (0)150 (100)
Group III    0 (0)  0 (0)  50 (33.4)19 (13.3)30 (20)0 (0)20 (13.3)20 (13.3)11 (6.7)150 (100)
Total105 (23.3)66 (14.8)106 (23.6)40 (8.8)55 (12.3)6 (1.3)37 (8.2)24 (5.3)11 (2.4)450 (100)

p value significant at the <0.05 level

Table 6: Comparison of vitamin D level in all groups
GroupsPretreatment (mean) (ng/mL)Posttreatment (mean) (ng/mL)p value
Group I13.216.40.01
Group II13.615.60.02
Group III17.517.80.91

Fig. 4: Comparison of vitamin D level in all groups

The suppressive effect of 1,25(OH)2D3 was supported by another study which was done on the effect of vitamin D on the immune system.8 An important role is played by natural killer T (NKT) cells in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases as well as cancer. Yu and Cantorna reported that proliferation of NKT cells and increase in interleukin 4 and interferon gamma production of NKT cells are promoted by vitamin D.9 Hence, from the aforementioned findings it can be said that vitamin D plays an important role in immune-mediated disorders.

Lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory disease which occurs on skin and mucous membranes including oral mucosa. The main mechanism of pathogenesis of oral lichen planus is cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The apoptosis of oral epithelial cells is triggered by autocytotoxic CD8+ T cell. In oral lichen planus, the subepithelial infiltrates are composed of T cells and macrophages. A majority of the T cells which are present in the epithelium and are present adjacent to the damaged basal keratinocytes are activated by CD8+ lymphocytes.10 The proliferation of T cells specifically CD8+ cells is inhibited by activated vitamin D resulting in reduction of interleukin 2.11

The vitamin D deficiency causes dysregulation of proliferation of T-cell and might be the reason of development of oral lichen planus.12 A study by Zhao et al. showed that for the downregulation of VDRs in oral keratinocytes, lipopolysaccharide is responsible which is associated with the development of oral lichen planus.13

In this study, every patient was asked to estimate serum vitamin D level. From the 450 patients, none of the patients had vitamin D level more than or equal to 20 ng/mL. The lowest vitamin D level was 7.9 ng/mL and the highest was 17.8 ng/mL. Thus, all the patients exhibited vitamin D deficiency. We found that posttreatment subjective symptom score 8 was less in group I and group II as compared to group III. There was significant difference in group I and group II (p < 0.05).

In this study, we found that mean vitamin D posttreatment value was 16.4 ng/mL in group I, 15.6 ng/mL in group II, and 17.8 ng/mL in group III. The difference was found to be significant in group I and group II. The effect of vitamin D supplementation was much better in group I and group II patients.

In this study, when patients were compared for burning sensation, those patients who had severe vitamin D deficiency and those with a history of stress as well had a higher visual analog scale score as compared to patients with mild and moderate vitamin D deficiency as in group I. Those patients (group II) who were on a combination of topical steroids and vitamin D supplementation showed more posttreatment improvement in burning sensation than in the patients who were not taking vitamin D supplementation (group III).

Low vitamin D levels are also said to have an effect on mental health as such patients show depression. The role of stress in decreasing vitamin D is not as such but it increases the blood cortisol levels. Godschalk et al.14 found out that the number of VDRs is altered by glucocorticoids by inhibiting VDR gene transcription or by affecting the VDR mRNA processing. Hence, there is an indirect role of the stress in hormonal vitamin D which can affect the immune modulation.

Stress is said to be the most common cause associated with oral lichen planus. But the exact role is yet to be understood. In this study, the patients who had severe vitamin D deficiency had more stress. However, the treatment response was much better in group I than other groups.

Various studies have been carried out which show the effect of vitamin D levels on immune-mediated diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and multiple sclerosis.1517

There are various less studies which have reported the use of vitamin D supplementation in oral lichen planus. A case has been reported in a 40-year-old female who showed marked improvement in oral lichen planus after she was injected 300,000 units of cholecalciferol intramuscularly.18,19

Another study concluded that 1,25(OH)2D3 plays an anti-inflammatory role in oral lichen planus as it has an effect on the NF-kB signaling pathway.

Therefore, from the findings we can conclude that low vitamin D plays a crucial role in causing oral lichen planus. This study supports the fact that vitamin D supplementation can help in treating oral lichen planus better and earlier.

The limitations of the study are the small sample size and follow-up period. Not all forms of lichen planus were included in the study.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that while treating oral lichen planus, the patient should be asked to get serum vitamin D level tested so that vitamin D supplementation can be started and also patients should be counseled if they show signs and symptoms of stress. From the findings, it can be summarized that vitamin D plays an important role in the treatment of oral lichen planus.

REFERENCES

1. Karthikeyan P, Kumaresan R, Yelamanachi B, et al. Oral lichen planus - a review. Indian J Public Health Res Dev 2019;10(6):224–227. DOI: 10.5958/0976-5506.2019.01271.3.

2. Gupta J, Aggarwal A, Asadullah MD, et al. Vitamin D in the treatment of oral lichen planus: a pilot clinical study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2019;31(3):222–227. DOI: 10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_97_19.

3. Wang J, van der Waal I. Disease scoring systems for oral lichen planus; a critical appraisal. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2015;20(2):199–204. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.20524.

4. Bouillon R, Carmeliet G, Verlinden L, et al. Vitamin D and human health. Lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice. Endocr Rev 2008;29(6):726–776. DOI: 10.1210/er.2008-0004.

5. Bhalla AK, Amento EP, Clemens TL, et al. Specific high affinity receptors for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: presence in monocytes and induction in T lymphocytes following activation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1983;57(6):1308–1310. DOI: 10.1210/jcem-57-6-1308.

6. Veldman CM, Cantorna MT, DeLuca HF. Expression of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (3) receptor in the immune system. Arch Biochem Biophys 2000;374(2):334–338. DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1605.

7. Alroy I, Towers TL, Freedman LP. Transcriptional repression of the interleukin-2 gene by vitamin D3: direct inhibition of NFATp/AP-1 complex formation by a nuclear hormone receptor. Mol Cell Biol 1995;15(10):5789–5799. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.15.10.5789.

8. Cippitelli M, Santoni A. Vitamin D3: a transcriptional modulator of the interferon-gamma gene. Eur J Immunol 1998;28:3017–3030. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199810)28:10<3017::AID-IMMU3017>3.0.CO;2-6.

9. Yu S, Cantorna MT. The vitamin D receptor is required or iNKT cell development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008;105:5207–5212. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0711558105.

10. Iijima W, Ohtani H, Nakayama T, et al. Infiltrating CD8 T cells in oral lichen planus predominantly express CCR5 and CXCR3 and carry respective chemokine ligands RANTES/CCL% and IP-10/CXCL10 in their cytolytic granules. Am J Pathol 2003;163(1):261–268. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63649-8.

11. Cantrona MT, Snyder L, Lin Y-D, et al. Vitamin D and 1,25(OH)2D regulation of T cells. Nutrients 2015;7(4):3011–3021. DOI: 10.3390/nu7043011.

12. Gupta A, Prakash Sasankoti Mohan R, Kamarthi N, et al. Serum vitamin D level in oral lichen planus patients of North India - a case control study. JDRT 2017;1(2):19–35. DOI: 10.14302/issn.2471-2175.jdrt-17-1481.

13. Zhao B, Li R, Yang F, et al. LPS-induced vitamin D receptor decrease in oral keratinocytes is associated with oral lichen planus. Sci Rep 2018;8:1–9. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-19234-z.

14. Godschalk M, Levy JR, Downs RW. Glucocorticoids decrease vitamin D receptor number and gene expression in human osteosarcoma cells. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7(1):21–27. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070105.

15. Merlino LA, Curtis J, Mikuls TR, et al. Vitamin D intake is inversely associated with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IOWA women’s health study. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50(1):72–77. DOI: 10.1002/art.11434.

16. Munger KL, Levin LI, Hollis BW, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of multiple sclerosis. JAMA 2006;296(23):2832–2838. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.23.2832.

17. Linker-Israeli M, Elstner E, Klineberg JR, et al. Vitamin D (3) and its synthetic analogs inhibit the spontaneous in vitro immunoglobulin production by SLE-derived PBMC. Clin Immunol 2001;99(1):82–93. DOI: 10.1006/clim.2000.4998.

18. Beena Varma R, Valappila NJ, Pai A, et al. Oral lichen planus: Is vitamin D deficiency a predisposing factor? A case report. Int J Sci Stud 2014;2(7):230–232.

19. Du J, Li R, Yu F, et al. Experimental study on 1,25(OH)2D amelioration of oral lichen planus through regulating NF-kB signaling pathway. Oral Dis 2017;23(6):770–778. DOI: 10.1111/odi.12659.

________________________
© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.