The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Immediate and Delayed Postpreparation on the Integrity of the Apical Seal: An in vitro Study

Abhay Kamra, Shantanu Choudhari, Sarvesha Bhondwe, S Srilatha, Neha Chhasatia Desai, Varsha Sanjay Pandit

Citation Information : Kamra A, Choudhari S, Bhondwe S, Srilatha S, Desai NC, Pandit VS. Effect of Immediate and Delayed Postpreparation on the Integrity of the Apical Seal: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (2):153-156.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1112

Published Online: 01-10-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate if there is any significant difference in apical leakage when gutta-percha is removed immediately after obturation for postspace preparation or after a week.

Materials and methods

Two commonly used sealers AH26 and tubliseal were used in four groups each consisting of 20 teeth each. The tooth was sectioned at the amelocemental junction to leave a root portion of 12 to 14 mm. Canals were checked for patency and prepared to No-55 K file size. Two people, using a stereomicroscope, independently evaluated each tooth-half for the extent of apical leakage.

Results

The leakage results were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA according to present study, immediate postpreparation is preferable than delayed postpreparation. The relationship of in vitro leakage measurements to the in vivo situation has not been established.

Clinical implication

Hence, immediate postpreparation is preferable than delayed postpreparation.

How to cite this article

Bhondwe S, Kamra A, Choudhari S, Srilatha S, Desai NC, Pandit VS. Effect of Immediate and Delayed Postpreparation on the Integrity of the Apical Seal: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(2):153-156.


PDF Share
  1. An investigation into bond strength between a root canal sealer and root filling points. Int Endod J 1987;20:217-22.
  2. Effect of postpreparation on the apical seal. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:785-89.
  3. Effect of immediate and delayed postpreparation on apical microleakage by using methacrylate-based EndoREZ sealer with or without accelerator. J Endod 2008;34:1504-07.
  4. Comparison of coronal bacterial leakage between immediate versus delayed post-space preparation in root canals filled with Resilon/Epiphany. Int Endod J 2009;42:203-07.
  5. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered, Part-I: Methodology, application and relevance. Int. Endod J 1993;26:37-43.
  6. The effect of immediate vs delayed postspace preparation on the apical seal of a root canal filling: A study in an increased-sensitivity pressure-driven system. J Endod 2000;26:435-39.
  7. Comparison of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed postspace preparation using AH Plus sealer. J Endod 2005;31:752-54.
  8. Effect of immediate and delayed postpreparation on apical leakage using 2 different sealers J Endod 1996;22:583-86.
  9. The effect of immediate vs delayed dowel space preparation on the integrity of the apical Seal. J Endod 1982;8:154-60.
  10. Evaluation of apical sealing of three endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2000;33:25-27.
  11. A comparative study of important physical properties of various root canal sealers. Oral Surg Oral Medi and Oral Patho 1971;32:928-37.
  12. Effect of postspace preparation on apical seal using solvent techniques and peeso reamers. J Endodontology 1982;8:351-54.
  13. Physical properties of root canal cements. J Endod 1976;2(6):166-75.
  14. Biocompatibility of surface sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. Journal of Prosthet Dent 1987;57:1-8.
  15. Influence of immediate and delayed postspace preparation on sealing ability of resilon. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:61-64.
  16. Linear and volumetric analysis of apical leakage in teeth prepared for posts. J Endod 1984;10:422-27.
  17. A comparative study of five different obturation techniques. Acta Stomat Croat 2006;40(1):3-11.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.