The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Three Different Contamination Removal Methods on Bond Strength of a Self-etching Adhesive to Dentin Contaminated with an Aluminum Chloride Hemostatic Agent

Siavash Savadi Oskoee, Mahmoud Bahari, Amir Ahmad Ajami, Mehdi Abed Kahnamoii, Soodabeh Kimyai, Fatemeh Pournaghi-Azar

Citation Information : Oskoee SS, Bahari M, Ajami AA, Kahnamoii MA, Kimyai S, Pournaghi-Azar F. Effect of Three Different Contamination Removal Methods on Bond Strength of a Self-etching Adhesive to Dentin Contaminated with an Aluminum Chloride Hemostatic Agent. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (1):26-33.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1264

Published Online: 01-06-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

This study evaluated the effect of three different contamination removal methods on bond strength of one-step self-etching adhesive to dentin contaminated with an aluminum chloride hemostatic agent.

Materials and methods

One hundred noncarious adult molars were used in this study; 2-mm-thick dentin disks were prepared and randomly assigned to 5 groups (n = 20). Group I: control; group II: hemostatic agent-contaminated; group III: hemostatic agent-contaminated and rinsing with water; group IV: hemostatic agent-contaminated and ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) application; and group V: hemostatic agent-contaminated and phosphoric acid application. Clearfil S3 Bond was used to bond composite to dentin surfaces. Subsequent to adding composite cylinders the shear bond strength test was performed. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Two additional specimens from each group were prepared and evaluated under scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Results

There were statistically significant differences in bond strength among the groups (p < 0.001). In two-by-two comparisons statistically significant differences were observed in bond strength values between all the groups (p < 0.001) except for groups I and IV (p = 0.933).

Conclusion

Aluminum chloride hemostatic agent adversely affected the bond strength of self-etch adhesive to dentin. However, application of EDTA increased the bond strength to the level of normal dentin.

Clinical significance

EDTA and phosphoric acid removed aluminum chloride hemostatic agent contamination of dentin surfaces. However, unlike EDTA phosphoric acid failed to increase the bond strength of self-etch adhesive to dentin to the level of the control group.

How to cite this article

Ajami AA, Kahnamoii MA, Kimyai S, Oskoee SS, Pournaghi-Azar F, Bahari M, Firouzmandi M. Effect of Three Different Contamination Removal Methods on Bond Strength of a Self-etching Adhesive to Dentin Contaminated with an Aluminum Chloride Hemostatic Agent. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(1):26-33.

PDF Share
  1. Bonding efficiency and interfacial morphology of one-bottle adhesives to contaminated dentin surfaces. Am J Dent 1998;11:281-85.
  2. The influence of blood contamination on bond strengths between dentin and an adhesive resin cement. Oper Dent 2000;25:195-201.
  3. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9:295-99.
  4. The use of chemical agents in gingival retraction. Gen Dent 1990;38:104-08.
  5. Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:477-82.
  6. Bond strengths of two adhesive systems to dentin contaminated with a hemostatic agent. Oper Dent 2007;32:399-405.
  7. Bond strength of composite to astringent-contaminated dentin using selfetching adhesives. Am J Dent 2005;18:168-72.
  8. Uptake and retention of aluminum by dental enamel. J Dent Res 1985;64:1374-76.
  9. Aluminum uptake and inhibition of enamel dissolution by sequential treatments with aluminum solutions. Caries Res 1994;28:401-05.
  10. Effects of aluminum (III) and fluoride on the demineralization of bovine enamel: A longitudinal microradiographic study. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:198-201.
  11. The chemistry of aluminum as related to biology and medicine. Clin Chem 1986;32:1797-806.
  12. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step selfetch adhesive in cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:512-18.
  13. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992;71:1530-40.
  14. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. J Dent Res 2003;82:141-45.
  15. The effect of 6 years of water storage on resin composite bonding to human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;69:25-32.
  16. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003;82:136-40.
  17. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: Effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:397-412.
  18. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in selfetch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005;26:1035-42.
  19. An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:83-98.
  20. Adhesion of resin composite core materials to dentin. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:451-56.
  21. Effects of conditioners on microshear bond strength to enamel after carbamide peroxide bleaching and/or casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) treatment. J Dent 2007;35:862-70.
  22. Resin-dentin bonds to EDTAtreated vs acid-etched dentin using ethanol wet-bonding. Part II: Effects of mechanical cycling load on microtensile bond strengths. Dent Mater 2011;27:563-72.
  23. Bond strengths of resin cements to astringent-contaminated dentin. Oper Dent 2009;34:415-22.
  24. Microtensile bond strength to bovine sclerotic dentine: Influence of surface treatment. J Dent 2008;36:922-27.
  25. Bonding strategies to pulp chamber dentin treated with different endodontic irrigants: Microshear bond strength testing and SEM analysis. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:63-70.
  26. The stability of hydrated aluminium phosphate, AlPO4 x 1.5H2O. Environ Technol 2006;27:1217-24.
  27. Influence of phosphoric acid pretreatment on self-etching bond strengths. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:33-40.
  28. Bond strength of a mild selfetch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 2006;34:77-85.
  29. Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2002;15:305-08.
  30. Influence of additional acid etch treatment on resin cement dentin infiltration. J Prosthodont 2000;9:77-81.
  31. Effect of phosphoric acid etching and self-etching primer application methods on dentinal shear bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:345-49.
  32. Influence of previous acid etching on dentin bond strength of self-etch adhesives. J Oral Sci 2009;51:527-34.
  33. Microtensile bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives to intrapulpal dentin after endodontic irrigation and setting of root canal sealer. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:57-64.
  34. Electrochemical behaviour of aluminum in the presence of EDTA-containing chloride solutions. J Appl Electrochem 2000;30:675-83.
  35. Selective masking and demasking for the stepwise complexometric determination of aluminium, lead and zinc from the same solution. Chem Cent J 2008;2:4.
  36. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod 2002;28:17-19.
  37. The demineralizing effects of EDTA at different concentrations and pH. J Endod 2002;28:501-02.
  38. Longterm mechanical properties of EDTA-demineralized dentin matrix. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:193-99.
  39. Does endodontic post space irrigation affect smear layer removal and bonding effectiveness? Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:597-603.
  40. Combination of EDTA conditioner and phenyl-P/HEMA self-etching primer for bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1999;15:153-57.
  41. EDTA or H3PO4/NaOCl dentine treatments may increase hybrid layers’ resistance to degradation: A microtensile bond strength and confocal-micropermeability study. J Dent 2009;37:279-88.
  42. Resin-dentin bonds to EDTA-treated vs. acidetched dentin using ethanol wet-bonding. Dent Mater 2010;26:368-79.
  43. Shear strength after ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid conditioning of dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2001;59:418-22.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.