The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Regenerative Potential of GTR Membrane (Biomesh®) along with Alloplastic Bone Graft (Biograft®) in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects

James Manohar Mopur, T Rama Devi, Syed Muhammad Ali, TS Srinivasa, V Gopinath, AR Tariq Salam

Citation Information : Mopur JM, Devi TR, Ali SM, Srinivasa T, Gopinath V, Salam AT. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Regenerative Potential of GTR Membrane (Biomesh®) along with Alloplastic Bone Graft (Biograft®) in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (3):434-439.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1340

Published Online: 01-06-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background and objectives

The primary goal of periodontal therapy is to restore the tooth supporting tissues lost due to periodontal disease. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of combination of GTR membrane and alloplastc bone graft with open flap debridement (OFD) in treatment of periodontal intrabony defects.

Methods

Twenty paired intrabony defects were surgically treated using split mouth design. The defects were randomly assigned to treatment with OFD, GTR membrane + bone graft (test) or OFD alone (control). The clinical efficacy of two treatment modalities was evaluated at 6 months postoperatively by clinical, radiographical parameters. The measurements included probing pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), bone fill (BF), bone density (BD).

Results

The mean reduction in PD at 0 to 6 months was 3.20 ± 0.82 mm and CAL gain of 3.10 ± 1.51 mm occurred in the GTR membrane + bone graft (test) group; corresponding values for OFD (control) were 2.10 ± 0.63 mm and 1.90 ± 0.57 mm. Similar pattern of improvement was observed when radiographically postoperative evaluation was made. All improvement in different parameters was statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Treatment with a combination of collagen membrane and bone graft led to a significantly more favorable clinical outcome in intrabony defects as compared to open flap debridement alone.

How to cite this article

Mopur JM, Devi TR, Ali SM, Srinivasa TS, Gopinath V, Salam ART. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Regenerative Potential of GTR Membrane (Biomesh®) along with Alloplastic Bone Graft (Biograft®) in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(3):434-439.


PDF Share
  1. Diagnosis and epidemiology of periodontal osseous lesions. Periodontology 2000;22:8-21.
  2. A systematic review of graft material and biological agents for periodontal intraosseous defects. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:117-135.
  3. Periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects: an evidence-based treatment approach. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15:128-145.
  4. Treatment of intrabony defects by polylactic acid matrix barrier. Periodontol Clin Investig 1997;19:22.
  5. Human intrabony lesion responses to debridement, porous hydroxyapatite implants and teflon barrier membranes. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:605-610.
  6. Efficiency of split-mouth designs. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:722-728.
  7. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal conditions. Acta Odont Scand 1963;24:747-759.
  8. Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odont Scand 1963;21:533-551.
  9. Bone probing measurement as a reliable evaluation of the bone level in periodontal defects. J Periodontol 2000;71:729-735.
  10. Reliability of attachment level measurements using the cementoenamel junction and a plastic stent. J Periodontol 1987;58:115-118.
  11. The Periodontal index. J Periodontol 1962;38:604-610.
  12. Clinical evaluation of porous and nonporous hydroxyapatite in the treatment of human periodontal bony defects. J Periodontol 1987;58:521-527.
  13. Clinical evaluation of regenerative potential of type I collagen membrane along with xenogenic bone graft in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects assessed with surgical re-entry and radiographic linear and densitometric analysis. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2009;14(1):23-29.
  14. The infrabony pocket: classification and treatment. J Periodontol 1958;29:272-291.
  15. Clinical, radiographic and histologic evaluation of human periodontal defects treated with Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:321-331.
  16. Combined periodontal regenerative technique in human intrabony defects by collagen membranes and anorganic bovine bone. A controlled clinical study. J Periodontol 2002;73:156-166.
  17. An evaluation of a resorbable (semirigid) GTR membrane in human periodontal intraosseous defects: a clinicoradiological re-entry study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2011;15:393-397.
  18. Guided tissue regeneration with biomesh membrane for class II furcation defects. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2001 Jun;19(3):167-168.
  19. Biograft-HT® as a bone graft material in the treatment of periodontal vertical defects and its clinical and radiological evaluation: clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2009 Sep-Dec;13(3):138-144.
  20. In vitro calibration and validation of a digital subtraction radiography system using scanned images. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:114-118.
  21. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:558-564.
  22. Periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 2005;76:1601-1622.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.