The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Assessment of Palatal Masticatory Mucosa: A Cross-sectional Study

BR Anuradha, Anne Gopinadh, Bugude Shiva Shankar, Bijoy John, KA Ravi Varma Prasad, K Naga Neelima Devi

Citation Information : Anuradha B, Gopinadh A, Shankar BS, John B, Prasad KR, Devi KN. Assessment of Palatal Masticatory Mucosa: A Cross-sectional Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (3):536-543.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1358

Published Online: 01-06-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To treat mucogingival problems palatal masticatory mucosa is used as a donor material. This study aimed to determine the thickness of donor palatal mucosa and associations of age and gender in Indian subjects aged 14 to 60 years by direct clinical technique.

Materials and methods

Forty systemically and periodontally healthy Indian subjects (20 males; 20 females; age range of 14 to 60 years) enrolled in this study. Under local anesthesia bone sounding technique was performed at 15 defined and predetermined points. The Wilcoxon test was used to determine the difference in mucosal thickness between the age groups and between genders. Significance of the difference between individuals of different body mass index (BMI) was assessed by independent t-test.

Results

With mean thickness of 2.0 to 3.7 mm, the younger age group demonstrated significantly thinner donor mucosa (mean 2.8 ± 0.3 mm) than the older age group (mean 3.1 ± 0.3 mm). Within the same age group though statistically not significant; males had thicker mucosa than females. From the canine to second premolar areas and in the sites furthest from the gingival margin mucosa thickness increased. When correlated with subject's BMI, in all probed sites males demonstrated significantly a thicker mucosa than females. Within each group subjects with high BMI demonstrated thicker donor mucosa.

Conclusion

Current study showed that in both adult and young individuals, premolar and canine areas can be the right site for harvesting donor tissue. Even in young subjects subepithelial connective tissue (CT) graft can be harvested in adequate volume. Donor tissue thickness can be influenced by factors like genetics and race, which need to be further evaluated.

Clinical significance

Premolar and canine areas serve as appropriate choice to harvest palatal masticatory mucosa. Even in young patients the volume of donor tissue available is sufficient enough to consider the subepithelial CT graft procedure. Donor tissue thickness can be influenced by factors like genetics and race, which need to be further evaluated.

How to cite this article

Anuradha BR, Shankar BS, John B, Prasad KARV, Gopinadh A, Devi KNN. Assessment of Palatal Masticatory Mucosa: A Cross-sectional Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(3):536-543.


PDF Share
  1. Free transplantation of gingival propria. Sven Tandalk Tidskr 1963;22:684-688.
  2. Root coverage with free gingival graft. Factors associated with incomplete root coverage. J Periodontol 1987 Oct;58(10):674-681.
  3. Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Edu Dent 1983 Sep-Oct;4(5):437-453.
  4. Intraoral palatal mucosal graft harvest. Ophthal Plast Reconst Surg 1993 Jun;9(2):120-124.
  5. Management of lower lid retraction with hard palate mucosa grafting. Arch Opthal 1990 Sep;108(9):1339-1343.
  6. Palatal grafts for lip reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1983 Apr;10(4):301-305.
  7. Tracheoplasty with palatal mucoperiosteal graft. Plast Reconst Surg 1990 Sep;86(3):558-562.
  8. Free full thickness mucosal grafts in the mouth. Aust Dent J 1976 Apr;21(2):131-135.
  9. O’ Steen AN. Free grafts of palatal mucosa in mandibular vestibuloplasty. J Oral Surg 1970 Aug;28(8):565-574.
  10. The free autogenous gingival graft. Dent Clin North Am 1980 Oct;24(4):651-682.
  11. Augmentation of the deformed residual edentulous ridge for fixed prosthesis. Compend Cont Educ Dent 1980 May-Jun;1(3):205-214.
  12. The edentulous ridge in fixed prosthodontics. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1981 Jul-Aug;2(4):212-224.
  13. The minute anatomy of the denture bearing area. J Am Dent Assoc 1934 Mar;21(3):488-504.
  14. The effects of complete dentures on the gum tissues. Acta Odontol Scand 1958 May;16(1):1-40.
  15. A histological comparison of the edentulous denture and the nondenture bearing tissues. J Prosthet Dent 1965 May-Jun;15:419-434.
  16. The management of abused oral tissues in complete denture reconstruction. J Prosthet Dent 1957;7:27-42.
  17. The use of ultrasonic thickness measurement in the clinical evaluation of the oral soft tissues. Int Dent J 1971;21:418-429.
  18. Noninvasive measurement of the thickness of oral soft tissue. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1986 Dec;30(6):1402-1411.
  19. Development and application of ultrasonic imaging system for dental diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound 1985 Oct;13(8):597-600.
  20. Application of ultrasonic pulse eco method in the region of prosthodontics. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 1986;30:684-690.
  21. Measurement in vivo of masticatory mucosa thickness with 20 MHz B-mode ultrasonic device. J Dent Res 1989 Feb;68(2):95-100.
  22. Buccal and palatal exostoses: prevalence and concurrence with tori. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000 Jul;90(1):48-53.
  23. Palatal tubercles, palatal tori, and mandibular tori: prevalence and anatomical features in a US population. J Periodontol 1999 Mar;70(3):329-336.
  24. Oral structural biology. New York: Thieme Verlag; 1991. 350-370 p.
  25. Mucogingival problems prevalence and therapy in children. J Periodontol 1986 Sep;46(9):543-552.
  26. Diagnosis and management of mucogingival problems in children. Dent Clin North Am 1980 Oct;24(4):683-703.
  27. The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmentation procedures. J Periodontol 1997 Feb;68(2):145-151.
  28. Thickness of masticatory mucosa. J Clin Periodontol 2000 Jun;27(6):431-436.
  29. Ultrasonic determination of thickness of masticatory mucosa: a methodological study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio Endo 1999 Aug;88(2):248-253.
  30. The subepithelial connective tissue graft palatal donor site: anatomic considerations for surgeons. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996 Apr;16(2):130-137.
  31. Relationships between alveolar bone height measured at surgery, estimated by transgingival probing and clinical attachment level measurements. J Clin Periodontol 1989 Feb;16(2):81-86.
  32. Use of furcal bone sounding to improve accuracy of furcation diagnosis. J Periodontol 1994 Jul;65(7):649-657.
  33. An evaluation of a noninvasive method of assessing alveolar bone levels in an experimental model of cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998 Jan;35(1):1-8.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.