The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Bond Strength of Overdenture Locator Posts Cemented with Seven Luting Agents

Khalil Aleisa

Citation Information : Aleisa K. Bond Strength of Overdenture Locator Posts Cemented with Seven Luting Agents. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (4):675-680.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1384

Published Online: 01-08-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Statement of the problem

Post retention is crucial factor in restoration survival. Posts are commonly failed due to loss of retention. It is unknown which luting agents would provide the maximum bond strength for Locator overdenture posts.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond retentive strengths of Locator overdenture posts cemented with 7 luting agents.

Materials and methods

One hundred and five single rooted human teeth were decoronated and randomly assigned to 7 groups (n = 15). Post spaces were prepared with Locator post drills to the depth of 6 mm. The Locator posts were cemented with Variolink II, RelyX ARC, Multilink N, RelyX Unicem, ParaCore, or MultiCore Flow resin luting agents. Zinc phosphate cement was served as control group. Specimens were stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours. Each specimen was loaded in tension in an Instron universal testing machine. The maximum force required to dislodge each Locator post was recorded. Means and standard deviations were calculated and data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

The highest mean bond strength value for Locator posts was recorded for MultiCore® Flow group (mean = 550.1 N), while the lowest mean value was for RelyX Unicem™ resin cement group (mean = 216.8 N). A statistically significant difference in mean locator overdenture post bond strength was observed between the 7 cement types (p < 0.0001). ParaCore™ and MultiCore® Flow groups had significantly higher bond strength than all other groups, but they were not differed from each other.

Conclusion

Bond strength of Locator overdenture posts were influenced by the type of luting agents. MultiCore Flow and ParaCore resin cements offered the greatest retention.

Clinical significance

The type of luting agents had a significant effect on the retention of Locator posts. The use of Core buildup resin cements as luting agent with Locator post demonstrated the greatest retention.

How to cite this article

Aleisa K. Bond Strength of Overdenture Locator Posts Cemented with Seven Luting Agents. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(4):675-680.


PDF Share
  1. The root-supported overdenture using the locator overdenture attachment. Gen Dent 2002;50:448-453.
  2. Retention of overdenture posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cements. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:287-289.
  3. Retention of cast post and core cemented with three luting agents. Egyptian Dent J 2005;51:1333-1339.
  4. Selection of materials for post cementation. Dent Update 2000;27:350-354.
  5. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:380-385.
  6. Restoration and reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth with a polyethylene ribbon and prefabricated fiberglass post. Gen Dent 2000;48:700-706.
  7. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:423-428.
  8. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:227-233.
  9. Factors affecting the energy of adherence of experimental cements bonded to a nickelchromium alloy. J Dent Res 1995;74:715-720.
  10. Retention of radicular posts varying the application technique of the adhesive system and luting agent. Braz Oral Res 2006;20:347-352.
  11. Retention of cast endodontic posts: comparison of cementing agents. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:318-320.
  12. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:265-267.
  13. Effect of design of pre-fabricated posts and post heads on the retention of various cements and core materials. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:702-707.
  14. Effect of eugenol-based root canal sealers on retention of prefabricated metal posts luted with resin cement. Saudi Dent J 2009;21:69-73.
  15. Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal. J Endodont 2001;27: 13-17.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.