The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Long-Term Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Directbonded Brackets: An Epidemiologic Survey

Mohamad Hossein Ahangar Atashi

Citation Information : Atashi MH. Long-Term Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Directbonded Brackets: An Epidemiologic Survey. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (4):738-742.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1393

Published Online: 01-08-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The objective of the current epidemiologic study was to investigate characteristics associated with bracket failure in bonded brackets.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study on data of 144 patients treated during 2009 to 2012 was done. Baseline data including age, gender, malocclusion, bite type and debonding incidences per teeth were retrieved. ANOVA analysis and t-test were used to evaluate the data.

Results

Second premolar teeth had significantly higher debonding incidences. Patients’ age was negatively correlated with debonding incidences. No difference was observed for various types of malocclusion (class I, II and III), arch side (right or left) or arch location (upper or lower). However, deep bite patients had significantly higher failure incidents.

Conclusion

For a total of 144 patients with 2,524 bonded brackets, the overall failure rate was 7.8%. Deep bite was the only factor that was associated with higher bracket failure. The bracket failure incidents tend to decrease as patients age increase.

Clinical significance

Deep bite patients and also second premolar teeth seem to be especially prone to debonding incidents. Care must be taken to avoid premature contacts in deep bite patients. Also strict adherence to moisture control protocols when bonding second premolar teeth is recommended since these teeth are at increased risk for debonding.

How to cite this article

Atashi MHA, Shahamfar M. Long-Term Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Direct-bonded Brackets: An Epidemiologic Survey. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(4): 738-742.


PDF Share
  1. A clinical trial of light activated bonding material over an 18-month period. Br J Orthod 1987;14:11-20.
  2. Shear bond strength of new and recycled brackets to enamel. Braz Dent J 2006;17(1):44-48.
  3. Shear bond strength of rebonded brackets after removal of adhesives with Er, Cr:YSGG laser. Odontology 2011;99(2):129-134.
  4. Effect of resin removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthod 2006 Mar;76(2):314-321.
  5. 3M Unitek product Brochure (1995).
  6. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod 1998;25:283-287.
  7. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1976;69:318-327.
  8. Shear bond strength of new polycarbonate bracket—an in vitro study with 14 adhesives. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:295-301.
  9. Clinical evaluation of the failure rate of metallic brackets bonded with orthodontic composites. Braz Dent J 2012;23:399-402.
  10. Long term clinical failure rate of molar tubes bonded with a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 2005;75:1000-1002.
  11. A 6-month bracket survival with a self-etch adhesive. Angle Orthod 2006;76:863-868.
  12. A visible light-activated direct bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:335-348.
  13. A post-treatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1977;71:173-189.
  14. Structural variation in the surface zone of human teeth enamel observed by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biology 1982;27:383-392.
  15. A clinical trial comparing failure rates of two orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:127-130.
  16. Long term failure rate of brackets bonded with plasma and high intensity light-emitting diode curing lights. A clinical assessment. Angle Orthod 2007;77:707-710.
  17. A comparative in vivo assessment of the long term failure rate of two self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:96-98.
  18. Bond failure with a no-mix adhesive system. An 18-month clinical review. Angle Orthod 2008;78:545-548.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.