The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Knowledge of and Management Attitude regarding Dentin Hypersensitivity among Dentists from a West African Country

Fatou Leye Benoist, Fatou Gaye Ndiaye, Babacar Faye, Khaly Bane, Papa Ibrahima Ngom, Pierre Marie Koumakh Ndong

Citation Information : Benoist FL, Ndiaye FG, Faye B, Bane K, Ngom PI, Ndong PM. Knowledge of and Management Attitude regarding Dentin Hypersensitivity among Dentists from a West African Country. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15 (1):86-91.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1493

Published Online: 00-02-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of the present study was to assess knowledge of, and management attitude of dentists regarding Dentin hypersensitivity.

Materials and methods

The study involved all the dentists from private and public sectors, exerting in Senegal. The following data were requested from the surveyed dentists using an anonymous questionnaire; sociodemographics (i.e. age, gender, area of activity, etc.) and knowledge on triggering factor, type of pain, diagnosis, preventive and curative procedures.

Results

Out of the 238 dentists who received the questionnaire, 68.9% returned properly filled forms. They were 116 males and 48 females with a mean age of 41.99 ± 8.50 years. Eighty three percent of the participants had a good understanding of the characteristics of pain related to DH and 92% recogni-zed chemical and thermal stimuli as triggering factor while mechanical stimulus was not evoked. Many responders (90.9%) did not have any idea of the mechanism for pain transmission across the dentin. Regarding diagnosis technique, 68% use mechanical stimuli to elicit DH pain.

Regarding management procedure, the use of desensitizing tooth paste is the mostly chosen option followed by professional topical application of fluoride. More than 1/3rd of the surveyed dentists confess resorting to root canal to manage DH.

Conclusion

We recommend incorporation of basic science knowledge on orofacial pain and competencies to manage painful conditions like dentin hypersensitivity. Also, Health regulatory institutions should make continuing dental education a requirement to preserve the dental licensure.

How to cite this article

Benoist FL, Ndiaye FG, Faye B, Bane K, Ngom PI, Ndong PMK. Knowledge of and Management Attitude regarding Dentin Hypersensitivity among Dentists from a West African Country. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(1):86-91.


PDF Share
  1. Dentine hypersensitivity: its prevalence, aetiology and clinical management. Dent Update 1992;19(10):407-412.
  2. Dentine hypersensitivity in a private practice patient population in Australia. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38(1):52-60.
  3. An analysis of the aetiology, prevalence and clinical features of dentine hypersensitivity in a general dental population. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012;16(8):1107-1116.
  4. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity among adult patients attending a Nigerian teaching hospital. Oral Health Prev Dent 2007;5(1):49-53.
  5. Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist periodontology department. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23(11):989-992.
  6. Dentine hypersensitivity in subjects recruited for clinical trials: clinical evaluation, prevalence and intraoral distribution. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(3):226-231.
  7. Comparison of dentine hypersensitivity in selected occidental and oriental populations. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28(1):20-25.
  8. Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentin hypersensitivity in a population in Taipei, Taiwan. J Endod 1998;24(1):45-47.
  9. Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitive teeth among a group of Nigerian undergraduate students. Niger Postgrad Med J 2011;18(3):205-209.
  10. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in general dental practice in the UK. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27(11):860-865.
  11. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in a hospital clinic population in Hong Kong. J Dent 2003;31(7):453-461.
  12. Prevalence and distribution of dentin hypersensitivity and plaque in a dental hospital population. Quintessence Int 2001;32(5):372-376.
  13. Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity among Thai dental patients at the faculty of dentistry, Mahidol University. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2012;43(4):1059-1064.
  14. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in the general population in China. J Oral Rehabil 39(11):812-820.
  15. Construction and validation of the quality of life measure for dentine hypersensitivity (DHEQ). J Clin Periodontol 2010;37(11):973-980.
  16. Perceptions of dentine hypersensitivity in a general practice population. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(9):710-714.
  17. Dentine hypersensitivity—Australian dentists’ perspective. Aust Dent J 2010;55(2):181-187.
  18. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69(4):221-226.
  19. Enquête auprès de 100 dentistes marocains sur la prise en compte et la prise en charge de l'hypersensibilité dentinaire. Journal de l'Ordre des dentistes du Québec 2007;44:365-375.
  20. Dentine hypersensitivity — a review. Aetiology, symptoms and theories of pain production. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10(4):341-350.
  21. The Effectiveness of Systemp.desensitizer in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Primary Dental Care 2004;11:71-76.
  22. Dentists’ views on cervical hypersensitivity and their knowledge of its treatment. Endodontics & Dental Traumatology 1995;11:240-244.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.