Citation Information :
Trivedi P, Dube M, Pandya M, Sonigra H, Vachhani K. Effect of Different Burs on the Topography of Smear Layer Formation on the Dentinal Surface: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15 (2):161-164.
Trivedi P, Dube M, Pandya M, Sonigra H, Vachhani K, Attur K. Effect of Different Burs on the Topography of Smear Layer Formation on the Dentinal Surface: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(2):161-164.
Bonding of restorative resins to dentil: States of dentine adhesive and impact on cavity design and filling techniques. Int Dent J 1988 Jun;38(2):97-104.
J Dent Res 1957;36:957-996.
The microstructure of enamel and dentin related to cavity preparation. Adhesive Restorative Dental Materials. 11th ed. Phillips p.382-387.
Scanning electron microscopy of cut tooth surfaces and identification of debris by the use of the electron microprobe. J Dental Res 1970;Nov-Dec;49(6):Suppl:1359-1368.
Scanning electron microscopy of cavity margins finished with chisels or rotating instruments at low speed. J Dent Res 1974 Sept-Oct;1167-1174.
The role of friction and abrasion in the drilling of teeth. In the cutting edge: Interfacial dynamics of cutting and grinding. Pearlman, S, 1-41. DHEW Publication 76-670.
The effect of EDTA containing surface active solutions on the morphology of prepared dentin. J Dental Research 1980;59:1127-1131.
Effect of the action of rotary diamond instruments on enamel and dentin: an SEM study. J of Biol Buccale, 1983 March;1:63-73.
Micrographic and profilometric evaluation of finish produced by diamond and carbide burs on enamel and dentin. J Prosth Dent 1988 Sep;60(3):311-316.
Dentinal surface roughness: a compasison of tooth preparation techniques. J Prosthetic Dentistry 1993;69:160-164.
Effect of rotary instrumentation and different etchants on the removal of smear layer on human dentin. J Prosth Dent 2001;85(1):67-72.
A scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of Gluma CPS bonding system on dentinal smear layer produced by different bur types and rotational speeds on the resin-dentin interface. Quintessence International 1998;29:737-747.
Effect of cutting instruments on permeability and morphology of the Dentin surface. Operative Dentistry 1999;24:130-136.
Effect of smear layers on the bonding of selfetching primers to dentin. J Adhesive Dentistry 2000;2:99-116.
Surface roughness and wettability of enamel and dentin surfaces prepared with different burs. J Oral Rehabilitation 2001;28:654-650.
Microtensile bond strength of two single step adhesive systems to bur prepared dentin. J Adhesive Dentistry 2001;3:129-136.
Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one self etch priming adhesives. J Adhesive Dentistry 2002;4:283-289.
Effect of self-etching primer versus phosphoric acid etchant on bonding to bur prepared dentin. Operative Dentistry 2002;27:447-454.
Effect of cutting instruments on perme-ability and morphology of the dentin surface. Operative Dentistry 1999;24:130-136.
Effect of bur cut dentin on bond strength using two all-in-one and two step adhesive systems. J Adhesive Dentistry 2004;6:97-104.
Effect of bur type and conditioning on the surface and interface of dentin. J Oral Rehabilitation 2005;32:849-856.
Effect of dentinal surface preparation on bond strength of self-etching systems. Brazilian Oral Research 2006; 20(1):52-58.
