The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 12 ( December, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Repeatability in Color Measurements of a Spectrophotometer using Different Positioning Devices

So Ran Kwon, Fang Qian, Michael Hemming

Citation Information : Kwon SR, Qian F, Hemming M. Repeatability in Color Measurements of a Spectrophotometer using Different Positioning Devices. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (12):933-938.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1784

Published Online: 01-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability of color measurements of an intraoral spectrophotometer with the use of three different methods by two operators.

Materials and methods

A total of 60 teeth were obtained, comprising 30 human maxillary teeth [central incisors (n = 10); canines (n = 10); molars (n = 10)] and 30 artificial teeth [lateral incisors (n = 10); premolar (n = 20)]. Multiple repeated color measurements were obtained from each tooth using three measuring methods by each of the two operators. Five typodonts with alternating artificial and human teeth were made. Measurements were taken by two operators with the Vita EasyShade spectrophotometer using the custom tray (CT), custom jig (CJ) and free hand (FH) method, twice, at an interval of 2 to 7 days. Friedman test was used to detect difference among the three color measuring methods. Post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction applied was used for pair-wise comparison of color measurements among the three methods. Additionally, a paired-sample t-test was used to assess a significant difference between the two duplicated measurements made on the same tooth by the same operator for each color parameter and measuring method.

Results

For operator A, mean (SD) overall color change-ΔE* (SD) perceived for FH, CT and CJ were 2.21(2.00), 2.39 (1.58) and 2.86 (1.92), respectively. There was statistically significant difference in perceived ΔE* in FH vs CJ (p = 0.0107). However, there were no significant differences between FH and CT (p = 0.2829) or between CT and CJ (p = 0.1159). For operator mean ΔE* (SD) for FH, CT and CJ were 3.24 (3.46), 1.95 (1.19) and 2.45 (1.56), respectively. There was a significant difference between FH and CT (p = 0.0031). However, there were no statistically significant differences in ΔE* in FH vs CJ (p = 0.3696) or CT vs CJ (p = 0.0809).

Conclusion

The repeatability of color measurements was different among the three measuring methods by operators. Overall, the CT method worked well for both operators.

Clinical significance

The use of a custom tray with apertures can improve the repeatability of color measurements of an intraoral spectrophotometer.

How to cite this article

Hemming M, Kwon SR, Qian F. Repeatability in Color Measurements of a Spectrophotometer using Different Positioning Devices. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(12):933-938.


PDF Share
  1. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater 2011;27:97-108.
  2. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 2002;81:578-582.
  3. Performance of five commercially available tooth color measuring devices. J Prosth 2007;16:93-100.
  4. Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:178-185.
  5. Use of a reflectance spectrophotometer in evaluating shade change resulting from tooth-whitening products. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15(Suppl 1)S42-48.
  6. In vitro model to evaluate reliability and accuracy of a dental shadematching instrument. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:353-358.
  7. Precision of in vivo spectrophotometric color evaluation of natural teeth. J Oral Rehab 2007;34:613-621.
  8. Color change of vital teeth exposed to bleaching performed with and without supplementary light. J Dent 2009;37:840-847.
  9. The measurement of appearance. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1987.
  10. Color perception among different dental personnel. Oper Dent 2001;26:435-439.
  11. An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences. Color Res App 1979;68:1755-1759.
  12. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1989;68:1755-1759.
  13. Minimum color differences for discriminating mismatch between composite and tooth color. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13:41-48.
  14. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68:819-822.
  15. Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:254-260.
  16. Color and opacity variations in three different resin-based composite products after water aging. Dent Mater 2004;20:530-534.
  17. Dynamic model of hydrogen peroxide diffusion kinetics into the pulp cavity. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13:440-445.
  18. Efficacy of Do-It- Yourself Whitening as Compared to Conventional Tooth Whitening Modalities: An In Vitro Study. Operative Dentistry 2014;40:E21-27.
  19. Employment of reservoirs in at-home whitening trays: efficacy and efficiency in tooth whitening. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16:383-388.
  20. In vivo measurement of colour changes in natural teeth. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27: 786-792.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.