The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Solubility Evaluation of Different Root Canal Sealing Materials

Emre Bayram, Dilek Dalat, Melike Bayram

Citation Information : Bayram E, Dalat D, Bayram M. Solubility Evaluation of Different Root Canal Sealing Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (2):96-100.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1643

Published Online: 01-02-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the solubility of five different root canal sealers (AH Plus Jet, RealSeal SE, MTA Fillapex, Tubli-Seal, and Acroseal) in chloroform, eucalyptol and Endosolv-E solvents.

Materials and methods

Ninety root canal sealer samples were prepared and then divided into three groups for immersion in a solvent for 2, 5 or 10 minutes. The mean values of the root canal sealers’ dissolution in the solvents were obtained by the difference between the preimmersion original weight and the post-immersion weight on a digital analytical scale. Data were statistically analyzed by a Kruskal-Wallis test with a Bonferroni correction.

Results

Chloroform was a more effective solvent than eucalyptol or Endosolv E for all root canal sealers, except for RealSeal SE, at all time points (p < 0.003). RealSeal SE was the least soluble sealer in all solvents at all time points.

Conclusion

Chloroform demonstrated a superior ability over other solvents in dissolving canal sealing materials, and eucalyptol was found to be the least effective solvent in this study.

Clinical significance

This study can help to the clinicians about which solvent should be preferred for solving the filling materials in retreatment cases.

How to cite this article

Bayram E, Dalat D, Bayram M. Solubility Evaluation of Different Root Canal Sealing Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(2):96-100.


PDF Share
  1. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three newer root canal obturating materials guttaflow, resilon and thermafil: an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2013;5(1):54-65.
  2. Comparison of cold lateral condensation and a warm multiphase gutta-percha technique for obturating curved root canals. Int Endod J 2000;33(5):415-420.
  3. Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root-canal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;10(3):105-108.
  4. Alternative solvents to chloroform for gutta-percha removal. J Endod 1990;16(5):224-226.
  5. Effectiveness of eucalyptol and d-limonene as gutta-percha solvents. J Endod 1997;23(12):739-741.
  6. Endodontic retreatment of thermafil or lateral condensation obturations in post space prepared teeth. J Endod 1994;20(1):9-12.
  7. Retreatment efficacy 3 months after obturation using glass ionomer cement, zinc oxideeugenol, and epoxy resin sealers. J Endod 1994;20(2):90-92.
  8. Effectiveness of halothane used with ultrasonic or hand instrumentation to remove gutta-percha from the root canal. J Endod 1991;17(5):221-224.
  9. Efficacy of retreatment techniques for a resin-based root canal obturation material. J Endod 2006;32(4):341-344.
  10. Removing root canal obturation materials: a comparison of rotary file systems and re-treatment agents. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140(6):680-688.
  11. Removal of root canal filling materials using Er:YAG laser irradiation. Dent Mater J 2010;29(3):246-252.
  12. Dissolving efficacy of eucalyptus and orange oil, xylol and chloroform solvents on different root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2011;44(11):1024-1028.
  13. Current concepts in gutta-percha removal in endodontic retreatment. N Y State Dent J 2004;70(7):32-35.
  14. Efficacy of removing glass ionomer cement, zinc oxide eugenol, and epoxy resin sealers from retreated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73(5):609-612.
  15. In vitro evaluation of macrophage viability after incubation in orange oil, eucalyptol, and chloroform. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102(3):e24-27.
  16. Dissolving efficacy of some organic solvents on gutta-percha. Braz Oral Res 2007;21(4):303-307.
  17. Solubility of root canal sealers with different organic solvents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106(3):e67-69.
  18. New technology in endodontics—the Resilon-Epiphany system for obturation of root canals. Adv Med Sci 2006; 51Suppl 1:154-157.
  19. A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2009;42(9):785-793.
  20. Evaluation of compatibility between different types of adhesives and dualcured resin cement. J Adhes Dent 2002;4(4):271-275.
  21. Bond strength of Epiphany sealer prepared with resinous solvent. J Endod 2009;35(2):251-255.
  22. Solubility of Epiphany endodontic sealer prepared with resinous solvent. J Endod 2009;35(5):715-718.
  23. Retreatability of 2 mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealers: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Endod 2013;39(7):893-896.
  24. Regaining apical patency after obturation with gutta percha and a sealer containing mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2014;40(4):588-590.
  25. Dissolution of root canal sealer cements in volatile solvents. Int Endod J 2000;33(1):19-24.
  26. A comparison of the effectiveness of chloroform and eucalyptus oil in dissolving root canal sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93(5):611-616.
  27. Solvent capacity of different substances on gutta-percha and Resilon. Braz Dent J 2010;21(1):46-49.
  28. Effectiveness of three solvents and two associations of solvents on gutta-percha and resilon. Braz Dent J 2011;22(1):41-44.
  29. Evaluation of solubility, disintegration, and dimensional alterations of a glass ionomer root canal sealer. Braz Dent J 2003;14(2):114-118.
  30. Dissolving efficacy of organic solvents on root canal sealers. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10(1):50-54.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.