The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

An in vitro Comparison of Endodontic Medicaments Propolis and Calcium Hydroxide alone and in Combination with Ciprofloxacin and Moxifloxacin against Enterococcus Faecalis

Rahul Shrivastava, Vivek Kumar Rai, Aina Kumar, Sonal Sinha, Prerna Tripathi, Khushboo Gupta

Citation Information : Shrivastava R, Rai VK, Kumar A, Sinha S, Tripathi P, Gupta K. An in vitro Comparison of Endodontic Medicaments Propolis and Calcium Hydroxide alone and in Combination with Ciprofloxacin and Moxifloxacin against Enterococcus Faecalis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (5):394-399.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1696

Published Online: 00-05-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To evaluate and compare the antimicrobial properties of propolis and calcium hydroxide alone and in combination with ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin against Enterococcus faecalis (E. Faecalis).

Materials and methods

The laboratory study was carried out to test the effectiveness of propolis and calcium hydroxidealone as well as in combination with the established endodontic medicaments (moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin). The various combinations were—group 1: propolis, group 2: calcium hydroxide, group 3: moxifloxacin, group 4: ciprofloxacin, group 5: propolis + moxifloxacin, group 6: propolis + Ciprofloxacin, group 7: calcium hydroxide + ciprofloxacin, group 8: calcium hydroxide + moxifloxacin. The efficacy of these medicaments was tested by checking for the zone of inhibition for the specific strain (ATCC 29212) of E. faecalis at different time intervals, i.e. 24, 48 and 72 hours.

Results

Mean zone of inhibition was maximum in group V (21.94 ± 4.26) followed by group VI (18.80 ± 1.93), g roup I (18.71 ± 4.26), group VIII (15.88 ± 2.59), group III (14.91 ± 1.00), group VII (14.57 ± 2.17), group IV (13.91 ± 1.00) and minimum in group II (12.89 ± 2.14). Mean zone of inhibition was found to be maximum at 72 hours and minimum at 24 hours. At all time intervals, the combination of Propalis with Moxiflocacin showed the maximum antimicrobial efficacy.

Conclusion

On the basis of the results of the present study, it can be concluded that propolis and calcium hydroxide show synergistic effect with moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin against E. Faecalis. Propolis in combination with antibiotics and alone is more effective than calcium hydroxide.

Clinical significance

Since propolis alone and in combination with antibiotics was observed to be more effective than calcium hydroxide, propolis can be considered as an intracanal medicament when compared to traditional calcium hydroxide

How to cite this article

Shrivastava R, Rai VK, Kumar A, Sinha S, Tripathi P, Gupta K, Sabharwal S. An in vitro Comparison of Endodontic Medicaments Propolis and Calcium Hydroxide alone and in Combination with Ciprofloxacin and Moxifloxacin against Enterococcus Faecalis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(5):394-399.


PDF Share
  1. Antimicrobial effect of propolis and other substance against selected endodontic pathogens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2007;104(5):709-715.
  2. Novel antibiotic regimens against Enterococcus faecium resistant to ampicillin, vancomycin, and gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37(9):1904-1908.
  3. Antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide-containing endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Int Endod J 1997;30(6):397-402.
  4. Systemic, prophylactic and local applications of antimicrobials in endodontic: an update review. Int Dent J 2009;59(4):175-186.
  5. Time and concentration dependent cytotoxicity of antibiotics used in endodontic therapy. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18(3):259-263.
  6. Minimal inhibitory concentrations and time-kill determination of moxifloxacin against aerobic and anaerobic isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2002;19(2):111-118.
  7. Quinolones: A comprehensive review. Am Fam Physician 2002;65(3):455-464.
  8. Fourth generation fluoroquinolones: new weapons in the arsenal of ophthalmic antibiotics. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133(4):463-466.
  9. The effect of cataract surgery on ocular levels of topical moxifloxacin. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138(4):554-559.
  10. Development of the quinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;51(S1).1-11.
  11. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis from canals of root filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int Endod J 2004;37(11):756-763.
  12. An Overview of Fluoroquinolones. Annu Rev Res Bio 2013;3(3):296-313.
  13. Comparative in vitro activity of moxifloxacin against Gram-positive clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 2000;45(1):31-39.
  14. Propolis: a review. Bee Word 1979;60(2):59-83.
  15. Assessment of ion diffusion from a calcium hydroxide-propolis paste through dentin. Braz Oral Res 2012;26(4):318-322.
  16. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie 1995;26(2):83-99.
  17. Preliminary report on the effects of propolis on wound healing in the dental pulp. Z Naturforsch C 1998;53(11-12):1045-1048.
  18. Antibacterial activity of propolis collected in different regions of Brazil. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis 2006;12(2):276-284.
  19. Propolis as storage media for avulsed teeth: microscopic and morphometric analysis in rats. Dent Traumatol 2010;26(1):80-85.
  20. Properties and applications of calcium hydroxide in endodontics and dental traumatology. Int Endod J 2011;44(8):697-730.
  21. Evaluation of the antibacterial potential of tetracycline or erythromycin mixed with calcium hydroxide as intracanal dressing Against Enterococcus Faecalis in vivo. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96(6):744-750.
  22. Antimicrobial efficacy of octenidine Hydrochloride, MTAD, chlorhexidene gluconate mixed with calcium hydroxide. J Comtemp Dent Pract 2013;14(3);456-460.
  23. Fluoroquinolones: then and now. Compend Contin Educ Vet 2010 Jul;32(7):E1-9; quiz E9.
  24. Antibacterial properties of propolis (bee glue). J R Soc Med 1990;83(3);159-160.
  25. Antibacterial properties of propolis. Ceskoslovenska Stomatologie 1980;80(4):304-307.
  26. Propolis: anti-Staphylococcus aureus activity and synergism with antimicrobial drugs. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2005;100(5):563-566.
  27. Synergistic effect of honey and propolis toward drug multiresistant Staphylococcus Aureus, Escherichia Coli and Candida Albicans isolates in single and polymicrobial Cultures. Int J Med Sci 2012;9(9):793-800.
  28. Role of calcium hydroxide in endodontic: a review. Global J Medical and Public Health 2012;1(1):66-70.
  29. pH changes at the surface of root dentin after intracanal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 2011;27(1):43-45.
  30. In vitro antimicrobial activity of endodontic pastes with propolis extracts and calcium hydroxide: a preliminary study. Braz Dent J 2008;19(4):301-305.
  31. Propolis: anti-Staphylococcus aureus activity and synergism with antimicrobial drugs. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2005;100(5):563-566.
  32. Synergistic effect of ethanolic extract of propolis and antibiotics on the growth of staphylococcus aureus. Arzneimittelforschung 1993;43(5):607-609.
  33. Synergistic effect of propolis and antibiotic on the Salmonella Typhi. Braz J Microbiol 2006;37(2):108-112.
  34. Dexpanthenol and propolis extract in combination with local antibiotics for treatment of Staphylococcal and Pseudomonal Wound infections. Archives of Clinical Microbiology 2011;4(4:3):1-15.
  35. Antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus Faecalis Isolated from Gastrointestinal Tract of Broiler chicken after Propolis and Bee Pollen Addition. J Anim Sci Biotec. 2012;45(1):58-63.
  36. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis and synergism between propolis and antimicrobial drugs. Microbiol Res 2003;158(4): 353-357.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.