The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of Different Post Systems for Fracture Resistance: An in vitro Study

Suneel V Vadavadagi, Kiran M Dhananjaya, Rashmi P Yadahalli, M Lahari, Shilpa R Shetty, BL Bhavana

Citation Information : Vadavadagi SV, Dhananjaya KM, Yadahalli RP, Lahari M, Shetty SR, Bhavana B. Comparison of Different Post Systems for Fracture Resistance: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (3):205-208.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2017

Published Online: 00-03-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Endodontic restoration becomes a challenging task for the clinician because of severe loss of coronal tooth structure owing to trauma, caries, restorative, and endodontic procedures. The restoration of these teeth requires the use of a post and core as individual units or as abutment supports for fixed or removable restorations in a predictable long-term manner.

Aim

To compare and assess the compressive bond strength of glass, quartz, and carbon fiber posts restored with porcelainfused- to-metal (PFM) crown.

Materials and methods

A total of 45 upper central incisor teeth having straight root canals, similar anatomically root segments, and fully developed apices were selected. Teeth were divided into three groups of 15 teeth after endodontic treatment. Group I: Teeth inserted with the prefabricated glass fiber post. Group II: Teeth inserted with the quartz fiber post. Group III: Teeth inserted with carbon fiber post. The posts were placed and core was fabricated using composite restoration followed by PFM crown cementation using adhesive resin. Compressive load required to fracture the tooth was measured using a universal loading machine. The difference between the variables was assessed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey's post hoc test.

Results

The compressive strength exhibited by carbon fiber posts was highest with a mean of 668.33 ± 26.397, followed by quartz fiber post (635.80 ± 30.390). Least compressive strength was exhibited by glass fiber post (567.53 ± 26.632). An analysis of variance shows statistically highly significant difference (p < 0.005) among the posts used.

Conclusion

This study concluded that the carbon fiber posts had higher compressive strength than other quartz, glass fiber posts.

Clinical significance

Endodontic treatment results in loss of a significant part of the tooth structure. Posts restore these teeth and provide retention.

How to cite this article

Vadavadagi SV, Dhananjaya KM, Yadahalli RP, Lahari M, Shetty SR, Bhavana BL. Comparison of Different Post Systems for Fracture Resistance: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(3):205-208.


PDF Share
  1. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003 Apr;89(4):368-373.
  2. In vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root-treated teeth. Int Endod J 1990 Nov;23(6):304-312.
  3. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored by different FRC posts: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2009 Jul-Sep;20(3):282-287.
  4. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of various post systems. An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2003 Apr:6(2)56-61.
  5. ; Mueller, KI. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, editors. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 765-796.
  6. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems: an in-vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont 2011 Jun;3(2):90-95.
  7. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002 Apr;87(4):431-437.
  8. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth. Post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 2005 May;136(5):611-619.
  9. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001 Mar;10(1):26-36.
  10. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993 Jul;70(1):11-16.
  11. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts. Quintessence Int 1996 Feb;27(2):93-97.
  12. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004 Jan;20(1):29-36.
  13. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1996 Nov;76(5):487-495.
  14. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon, quartz, and glass fiber-based posts. Saudi Endod J 2014 Sep;4(3):109-114.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.