The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of newly Developed Resin Cements and Thermocycling on the Strength of Porcelain Laminate Veneers

Citation Information : Effect of newly Developed Resin Cements and Thermocycling on the Strength of Porcelain Laminate Veneers. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (3):209-213.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2018

Published Online: 00-03-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different luting cements and accelerated artificial aging (AAA) in the fracture resistance of porcelain laminate veneers (PLVs).

Materials and methods

A total of 80 disc-shaped specimens were prepared using computer-aided design/computer-aided milling technology from lithium disilicate glass-ceramic blocks. Specimens (0.5 mm thick, 10 mm diameter) were divided into eight groups of 10 specimens per group. The control groups consisted of specimens without cement and not subjected to AAA (CN group) and specimens prepared without cement but subjected to AAA (CW group). The experimental groups were subjected to AAA and cemented with Variolink Veneer, Variolink Esthetic LC, Variolink Esthetic DC, RelyX Unicem, RelyX Veneer, or RelyX Ultimate. Specimens were individually tested for biaxial flexure on a universal testing machine. One-way analysis of variance and the Tukey's post hoc test were used to compare the groups’ significance statistically (α = 0.05).

Results

The loads to fracture (LTF) values in the CN group were higher than those in the CW and experimental groups. The lowest LTF value was in the CW group (31.5 ± 9.5 N) and the highest LTF value in the CN group (56.7 ± 10.6 N). Tukey's post hoc test demonstrated a statistically significant (p < 0.01) difference between the CN group and the other groups.

Conclusion

Artificial aging had a significant effect on the LTF value of the tested specimens compared with the resin cements used. Cohesive failure within the PLVs was the most common mode of failure.

Clinical significance

Fatigue strength of dental ceramics and moisture was shown to affect the mechanical properties of allceramic restorations. All-ceramic material is extremely sensitive to humidity and thermocycling.

How to cite this article

Alqahtani FI. Effect of newly Developed Resin Cements and Thermocycling on the Strength of Porcelain Laminate Veneers. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(3):209-213.


PDF Share
  1. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012 Jan-Feb;25(1):79-85.
  2. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000 Mar;28(3):163-177.
  3. Porcelain laminate veneer restorations bonded with a three-liquid silane bonding agent and a dual-activated luting composite. J Oral Sci 2006 Dec;48(4):261-266.
  4. Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am 2007 Apr;51(2):399-417, ix.
  5. Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012 Aug;24(4):257-265.
  6. Five-year clinical evaluation of 300 teeth restored with porcelain laminate veneers using total-etch and a modified self-etch adhesive system. Oper Dent 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):516-523.
  7. Comparison of marginal integrity of ceramic and composite veneer restorations luted with two different resin agents: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):59-64.
  8. Fracture resistance and deflection of pulpless anterior teeth restored with composite or porcelain veneers. J Endod 2010 Jan;36(1):153-156.
  9. Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging. Dent Mater J 2008 Jan;27(1):99-104.
  10. Degree of conversion of three composite materials employed in the adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: a micro-Raman analysis. J Dent 2009 Aug;37(8):610-615.
  11. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 1983 Jan;62(1):32-36.
  12. Predicting lifetimes of materials and material structures. Dent Mater 1995 Mar;11(2):142-146.
  13. In vitro mechanical tests for modern dental ceramics. J Dent (Tehran) 2006;3(3):143-152.
  14. Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1989 Nov;62(5):536-541.
  15. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999 Jun;81(6):652-661.
  16. Survival rate and fracture strength of maxillary incisors, restored with different kinds of full veneers. J Oral Rehabil 2005 Apr;32(4):266-272.
  17. Effect of thermocycling on the flexural strength of porcelain laminate veneers. J Conserv Dent 2008 Oct;11(4):144-149.
  18. Colour stability and opacity of resin cements and flowable composites for ceramic veneer luting after accelerated ageing. J Dent 2011 Nov;39(11):804-810.
  19. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987 Sep;66(9):1460-1465.
  20. The influence of cement lute, thermocycling and surface preparation on the strength of a porcelain laminate veneering material. Dent Mater 2004 Mar;20(3):286-292.
  21. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):60D-76D.
  22. Colour stability of laminate veneers: an in vitro study. J Dent 2011 Dec;39 (Suppl 3):e57-e64.
  23. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999 Feb;27(2):89-99.
  24. Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater 1995 Jan;11(1):47-51.
  25. Shear bond strength of resin cement to an acid etched and a laser irradiated ceramic surface. J Adv Prosthodont 2013 May;5(2):98-103.
  26. Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems. Braz Oral Res 2011 May-Jun;25(3):261-266.
  27. Marginal discrepancies and leakage of all-ceramic crowns: influence of luting agents and aging conditions. Int J Prosthodont 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):109-116.
  28. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems. J Prosthodont 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):457-464.
  29. The effect of thermocycling on the strength of porcelain laminate veneer (PLV) materials. Dent Mater 2003 Jun;19(4):291-297.
  30. Physiological aging of an all-ceramic restorative material. Dent Mater 1991 Apr;7(2):133-137.
  31. Surface roughness and flexural strength of self-glazed, polished, and reglazed In-Ceram/Vitadur Alpha porcelain laminates. Int J Prosthodont 2000 Jan-Feb;13(1):66-71.
  32. Bond degradation behavior of self-adhesive cement and conventional resin cements bonded to silanized ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2011 Mar;105(3):177-184.
  33. Shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers to enamel, dentine and enamel-dentine complex bonded with different adhesive luting systems. J Dent 2013 Feb;41(2):97-105.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.