The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 9 ( September, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of Apical Vapor Lock Formation and comparative Evaluation of its Elimination using Three different Techniques: An in vitro Study

Anand Agarwal, Zinnie Nanda, Rahul B Deore, Kavitarani Rudagi, Mirza Osman Baig, Md Adil Fareez

Citation Information : Agarwal A, Nanda Z, Deore RB, Rudagi K, Baig MO, Fareez MA. Evaluation of Apical Vapor Lock Formation and comparative Evaluation of its Elimination using Three different Techniques: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (9):790-794.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2128

Published Online: 01-09-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was (i) to evaluate the formation of air bubbles in the apical region of root canal (apical vapor lock) during syringe irrigation, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and (ii) comparative evaluation of the elimination of an established vapor lock by EndoActivator, ultrasonics, and manual dynamic agitation (MDA), using CBCT.

Materials and methods

A total of 60 extracted human singlerooted teeth were equally divided into three groups of 20 teeth each. The samples were decoronated 17 mm from the apex, cleaned, and shaped to size F4 Protaper using 3% sodium hypochlorite. Samples were irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite + cesium chloride radiopaque dye, and preoperative CBCT images were obtained. After formation of apical vapor lock in the scanned teeth, EndoActivator (group I), passive ultrasonic irrigation (group II), and MDA with K-file (group III) were performed and the teeth were again placed in CBCT scanner and results analyzed using the chi-square test.

Results

The apical vapor lock was formed in all the samples. Out of the 20 teeth in each group, the apical vapor lock was eliminated in 18 samples of EndoActivator group (90%), 16 samples of ultrasonic group (80%), while it was eliminated in 10 samples by MDA (50%).

Conclusion

It is concluded that (1) apical vapor lock is consistently formed during endodontic irrigation in closed canal systems and (2) sonic activation performs better than the ultrasonics and MDA in eliminating the apical vapor lock, with statistically significant difference between all the three groups (p < 0.05).

Clinical significance

The results suggest that the apical vapor lock (dead water zone) is consistently formed during endodontic irrigation which impedes irrigant penetration till the working length, thereby leading to inefficient debridement. Hence, to eliminate this vapor lock, techniques, such as sonics or ultrasonics should be used along with the irrigant after shaping and cleaning of the root canal.

How to cite this article

Agarwal A, Deore RB, Rudagi K, Nanda Z, Baig MO, Fareez MA. Evaluation of Apical Vapor Lock Formation and comparative Evaluation of its Elimination using Three different Techniques: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(9):790-794.


PDF Share
  1. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974 Apr;18(2):269-296.
  2. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997 Sep;30(5):297-306.
  3. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004 Nov;15(6):348-381.
  4. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod Top 2005 Mar;10(1):77-102.
  5. E., & Torabinejad, M. (2002). Principles and practice of endodontics. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders
  6. Forces and efficacy in endodontic irrigation systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982 Apr;53(4):425-428.
  7. Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. J Endod 1983 Nov;9(11):475-479.
  8. Influence of irrigant needle depth in removing bioluminescent bacteria inoculated into instrumented root canals using real-time imaging in vitro. Int Endod J 2005 Feb;38(2):97-104.
  9. Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a computational fluid dynamics study. Int Endod J 2009 Feb;42(2):144-155.
  10. Development and validation of a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model of root canal irrigation. J Endod 2009 Sep;35(9):1282-1287.
  11. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration. Int Endod J 2006 Feb;39(2):93-99.
  12. Influence of instrument size on root canal debridement. J Endod 2004 Feb;30(2):110-112.
  13. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod 2005 Mar;31(3):166-170.
  14. The in vivo evaluation of hand/rotary/ultrasound instrumentation in necrotic, human mandibular molars. J Endod 2007 Jul;33(7):782-787.
  15. The complete filling of dead-end conical capillaries with liquid. J Eng Phys 1989 Apr;56(4):395-397.
  16. Filling of one-side-closed capillaries immersed in liquids. J Colloid Interface Sci 1996 Jul;181(1):337-340.
  17. An experimental study of the gas entrapment process in closed-end microchannels. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2005 Dec;48(25-26):5150-5165.
  18. The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on pulp tissue of extracted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971 Jan;31(1):96-103.
  19. Effect of EDTA, sonic, and ultrasonic activation on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simu-lated lateral canals: an in vitro study. J Endod 2009 Jun;35(6):891-895.
  20. Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod 2010 Apr;36(4):745-750.
  21. The fluid mechanics of root canal irrigation. Physiol Meas 2010 Dec;31(12):R49-R84.
  22. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J 2001 Mar;34(2):137-141.
  23. Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. J Endod 2010 Jan;36(1):1-15.
  24. The effectiveness of syringe irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated irregularities within prepared root canal walls. Int Endod J 2004 Oct;37(10):672-678.
  25. An in vitro comparison of the efficacy of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars. J Endod 1985 Jun;11(6):249-256.
  26. In vitro comparisons of debris removal of the EndoActivator system, the F file, ultrasonic irrigation, and NaOCl irrigation alone after hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod 2010 Aug;36(8):1367-1371.
  27. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic streaming and its possible role. J Endod 1987 Oct;13(10):490-499.
  28. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2007 Jun;40(6):415-426.
  29. Root canal debridement using manual dynamic agitation or the EndoVac for final irrigation in a closed system and an open system. Int Endod J 2010 Nov;43(11):1001-1012.
  30. Evaluation of a sonic device designed to activate irrigant in the root canal. J Endod 2010 Jan;36(1):143-146.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.