The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Long-term Retrospective Study based on Implant Success Rate in Patients with Risk Factor: 15-year Follow-up

Atul Bhardwaj, Baburajan Kandasamy, Navleen Kaur, Gulshan K Tomar, Litto Manual, Meghna Chauhan

Citation Information : Bhardwaj A, Kandasamy B, Kaur N, K Tomar G, Manual L, Chauhan M. Long-term Retrospective Study based on Implant Success Rate in Patients with Risk Factor: 15-year Follow-up. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19 (1):90-93.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2217

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this retrospective study is to assess implant success rates with various risk factors. Materials and methods: Two hundred patients with a total of 650 implants were selected. Risk factors, such as smoking, antidepressants, bruxism, diabetes, and bone augmentation procedures were considered, and patients were followed up for a period of 8 to 15 years. Results: Of 650 implants placed, the success rate was 88%, i.e., a total of 572 implants were successful. A total of 78 implants were considered failure; and out of 78, twenty implants were surgically removed. Conclusion: Based on this study’s results, it is concluded that risk factors, such as smoking, bruxism, diabetes, and bone augmentation play an important role in success rate of dental implants. Clinical significance: Several factors, such as bruxism, diabetes, and supporting bone can play an important role in dental implant success.


PDF Share
  1. Holm-Pedersen P, Loe H. Textbook of geriatric dentistry. 2nd ed. London: Wiley; 1997
  2. Infections in implantology: from prophylaxis to treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007 Aug;12(4):E323-E330
  3. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2005 Oct;94(4):377-381
  4. Dental implants in the medically compromised patient. J Dent 2013 Mar;41(3):195-206
  5. Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc 1979 Mar;98(3):373-377
  6. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconst Surg 1969;3(2):81-100
  7. Long-term dental implant success and survival-a clinical study after an observation period up to 6 years. Swed Dent J 2012;36(1):1-6
  8. Long-term implant survival and success: a 10-16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010 Jul;21(7):772-777
  9. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998 Jun;106(3):721-764
  10. Dental implant management and maintenance: how to improve long-term implant success? Quintessence Int 2016;47(5):417-423
  11. Bruxism and dental implants: a meta-analysis. Implant Dent 2015 Oct;24(5):505-516
  12. The association between the failure of dental implants and cigarette smoking. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(6):609-15
  13. Long-term implant success at the academy for oral implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2014 Jun;44(3):102-108
  14. Effects of diabetes mellitus on periodontal and peri-implant conditions: update on associations and risks. J Clin Periodontol 2008 Sep;35 (Suppl 8):398-409
  15. Complications of dental implants: Identification, frequency, and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003 Nov-Dec;18(6):848-855
  16. Risk factors for dental implant failure: a strategy for the analysis of clustered failure-time observations. J Dent Res 2002 Aug;81(8):572-577
  17. Effect of smoking on the outcome of implant treatment: a literature review. Indian J Dent Res 2007 Oct-Dec;18(4):190-195
  18. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003 Jun;14(3):329-339
  19. Ten-year results of a three-arm prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients. Part 1: implant loss and radiographic bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010 May;21(5):490-496
  20. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):247-259
  21. Systemic conditions and treatments as risks for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 (Suppl):12-27.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.